Literature DB >> 2745876

Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). I: Effects of click level, rate, and polarity.

R Burkard1, H F Voigt.   

Abstract

Three experiments evaluating the effects of various stimulus manipulations on the click-evoked gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER) are reported. In experiment 1, click polarity and level were covaried. With increasing click level, there is a parallel decrease in the latency of the first five BAER peaks (i-v) and an increase in BAER peak amplitudes. Mean wave i amplitude was greater for rarefaction than condensation clicks at high click levels; mean wave v amplitude was greater for condensation clicks at higher click levels. Experiment 2 covaried click rate and polarity. The latency of the BAER peaks increased with increasing click repetition rate. This rate-dependent latency increase was greater for the later BAER peaks, resulting in an increase in the i-v interval with increasing click rate. As rate increased, the amplitudes of waves i and v decreased monotonically, whereas the amplitudes of waves ii-iv were largely uninfluenced by click rate. As in experiment 1, mean wave i amplitude was greater for rarefaction clicks, whereas mean wave v amplitude was greater for condensation clicks. The magnitude of these polarity dependencies on waves i and v amplitude decreased with increasing click rate. Experiment 3 evaluated the effects of click polarity on BAERs to high-intensity (100 dB pSPL) clicks presented at a rate of 10 Hz. In eight of ten gerbils evaluated, wave i amplitude was greater to rarefaction clicks, and, in all ten animals, wave v amplitude was greater to condensation clicks. The effects of click level and rate on BAER peak amplitudes, latencies, and interwave intervals are reminiscent of stimulus dependencies reported for the human BAER. The effects of click polarity on the amplitudes of waves i and v of the gerbil BAER have also been reported for the human BAER.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2745876     DOI: 10.1121/1.397746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Paired measurements of cochlear function and hair cell count in Dutch-belted rabbits with noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Hariprakash Haragopal; Ryan Dorkoski; Holly M Johnson; Mark A Berryman; Soichi Tanda; Mitchell L Day
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Assessing stimulus and subject influences on auditory evoked potentials and their relation to peripheral physiology in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea).

Authors:  Nathan P Buerkle; Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.320

3.  Auditory brainstem responses in 10 inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zhou; Philip H-S Jen; Kevin L Seburn; Wayne N Frankel; Qing Y Zheng
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Auditory brainstem response latency in forward masking, a marker of sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Andreu Paredes Gallardo; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  A comparison of auditory brainstem responses across diving bird species.

Authors:  Sara E Crowell; Alicia M Wells-Berlin; Catherine E Carr; Glenn H Olsen; Ronald E Therrien; Sally E Yannuzzi; Darlene R Ketten
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Auditory responses in the barn owl's nucleus laminaris to clicks: impulse response and signal analysis of neurophonic potential.

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The effects of click rate on the auditory brainstem response of bottlenose dolphins.

Authors:  Robert F Burkard; James J Finneran; Jason Mulsow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory brainstem responses and auditory thresholds in woodpeckers.

Authors:  Bernard Lohr; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Aging effects on the binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response in the Mongolian gerbil: Effects of interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Geneviève Laumen; Daniel J Tollin; Rainer Beutelmann; Georg M Klump
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Audiologic characterization using clinical physiological measures: Normative data from macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Amy N Stahl; Jane A Mondul; Katy A Alek; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.