| Literature DB >> 27455238 |
Huan Li1,2, Lin-Tong Yang3,4, Yi-Ping Qi5, Peng Guo6,7, Yi-Bin Lu8,9, Li-Song Chen10,11,12.
Abstract
Seedlings of aluminum-tolerant 'Xuegan' (Citrus sinensis) and Al-intolerant 'sour pummelo' (Citrus grandis) were fertigated for 18 weeks with nutrient solution containing 0 and 1.2 mM AlCl₃·6H₂O. Al toxicity-induced inhibition of photosynthesis and the decrease of total soluble protein only occurred in C. grandis leaves, demonstrating that C. sinensis had higher Al tolerance than C. grandis. Using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ), we obtained more Al toxicity-responsive proteins from C. sinensis than from C. grandis leaves, which might be responsible for the higher Al tolerance of C. sinensis. The following aspects might contribute to the Al tolerance of C. sinensis: (a) better maintenance of photosynthesis and energy balance via inducing photosynthesis and energy-related proteins; (b) less increased requirement for the detoxification of reactive oxygen species and other toxic compounds, such as aldehydes, and great improvement of the total ability of detoxification; and (c) upregulation of low-phosphorus-responsive proteins. Al toxicity-responsive proteins related to RNA regulation, protein metabolism, cellular transport and signal transduction might also play key roles in the higher Al tolerance of C. sinensis. We present the global picture of Al toxicity-induced alterations of protein profiles in citrus leaves, and identify some new Al toxicity-responsive proteins related to various biological processes. Our results provide some novel clues about plant Al tolerance.Entities:
Keywords: Citrus grandis; Citrus sinensis; aluminum toxicity; iTRAQ; leaves; proteome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27455238 PMCID: PMC4964550 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17071180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Effects of Al toxicity on leaf CO2 assimilation (A); stomatal conductance (B); intercellular CO2 concentration (C); Al (D) and total soluble protein (E) concentrations. Bars represent the means ± standard error SE (n = 5). DW: dry weight; FW: fresh weight. Differences among four treatment combinations (two species × two Al) were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance. Means were separated by Duncan’s new multiple range test. Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 2Classification of Al toxicity-responsive proteins in C. sinensis (A) and C. grandis (B) leaves; and Venn diagram analysis of Al toxicity-responsive proteins (C).
Figure 3Effects of Al toxicity on the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A); ascorbate peroxidase (APX) (B); catalase (CAT) (C); monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDAR) (D) and lipoxygenase (LOX) (E) in C. sinensis leaves. Bars represent the means ± SE (n = 4). Significance tests for two means (control and Al toxicity) were carried out by the unpaired t-test at the p < 0.05 level. Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05.