Literature DB >> 27454007

Assessing ECG signal quality indices to discriminate ECGs with artefacts from pathologically different arrhythmic ECGs.

C Daluwatte1, L Johannesen, L Galeotti, J Vicente, D G Strauss, C G Scully.   

Abstract

False and non-actionable alarms in critical care can be reduced by developing algorithms which assess the trueness of an arrhythmia alarm from a bedside monitor. Computational approaches that automatically identify artefacts in ECG signals are an important branch of physiological signal processing which tries to address this issue. Signal quality indices (SQIs) derived considering differences between artefacts which occur in ECG signals and normal QRS morphology have the potential to discriminate pathologically different arrhythmic ECG segments as artefacts. Using ECG signals from the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2015 training set, we studied previously reported ECG SQIs in the scientific literature to differentiate ECG segments with artefacts from arrhythmic ECG segments. We found that the ability of SQIs to discriminate between ECG artefacts and arrhythmic ECG varies based on arrhythmia type since the pathology of each arrhythmic ECG waveform is different. Therefore, to reduce the risk of SQIs classifying arrhythmic events as noise it is important to validate and test SQIs with databases that include arrhythmias. Arrhythmia specific SQIs may also minimize the risk of misclassifying arrhythmic events as noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27454007      PMCID: PMC4975422          DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/37/8/1370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  16 in total

1.  Discovering dangerous patterns in long-term ambulatory ECG recordings using a fast QRS detection algorithm and explorative data analysis.

Authors:  Matteo Paoletti; Carlo Marchesi
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Evaluation of an algorithm based on single-condition decision rules for binary classification of 12-lead ambulatory ECG recording quality.

Authors:  Luigi Yuri Di Marco; Wenfeng Duan; Marjan Bojarnejad; Dingchang Zheng; Susan King; Alan Murray; Philip Langley
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  QRS detection based ECG quality assessment.

Authors:  Dieter Hayn; Bernhard Jammerbund; Günter Schreier
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Signal-quality indices for the electrocardiogram and photoplethysmogram: derivation and applications to wireless monitoring.

Authors:  Christina Orphanidou; Timothy Bonnici; Peter Charlton; David Clifton; David Vallance; Lionel Tarassenko
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 5.772

5.  Automatic ECG quality scoring methodology: mimicking human annotators.

Authors:  Lars Johannesen; Loriano Galeotti
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.833

6.  The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2015: Reducing False Arrhythmia Alarms in the ICU.

Authors:  Gari D Clifford; Ikaro Silva; Benjamin Moody; Qiao Li; Danesh Kella; Abdullah Shahin; Tristan Kooistra; Diane Perry; Roger G Mark
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2015-09

7.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.

Authors:  Xavier Robin; Natacha Turck; Alexandre Hainard; Natalia Tiberti; Frédérique Lisacek; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Markus Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Removal of power-line interference from the ECG: a review of the subtraction procedure.

Authors:  Chavdar Levkov; Georgy Mihov; Ratcho Ivanov; Ivan Daskalov; Ivaylo Christov; Ivan Dotsinsky
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Insights into the problem of alarm fatigue with physiologic monitor devices: a comprehensive observational study of consecutive intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Barbara J Drew; Patricia Harris; Jessica K Zègre-Hemsey; Tina Mammone; Daniel Schindler; Rebeca Salas-Boni; Yong Bai; Adelita Tinoco; Quan Ding; Xiao Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Patient monitoring alarms in the ICU and in the operating room.

Authors:  Felix Schmid; Matthias S Goepfert; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  4 in total

1.  False alarm reduction in critical care.

Authors:  Gari D Clifford; Ikaro Silva; Benjamin Moody; Qiao Li; Danesh Kella; Abdullah Chahin; Tristan Kooistra; Diane Perry; Roger G Mark
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.833

2.  Artefact detection and quality assessment of ambulatory ECG signals.

Authors:  Jonathan Moeyersons; Elena Smets; John Morales; Amalia Villa; Walter De Raedt; Dries Testelmans; Bertien Buyse; Chris Van Hoof; Rik Willems; Sabine Van Huffel; Carolina Varon
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 3.  Robustness of electrocardiogram signal quality indices.

Authors:  Saifur Rahman; Chandan Karmakar; Iynkaran Natgunanathan; John Yearwood; Marimuthu Palaniswami
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Identification of Transient Noise to Reduce False Detections in Screening for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Hesam Halvaei; Emma Svennberg; Leif Sörnmo; Martin Stridh
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.