| Literature DB >> 27449744 |
Jie Bai1, Julie Tzu-Wen Wang1, Kuo-Ching Mei1, Wafa T Al-Jamal2, Khuloud T Al-Jamal3.
Abstract
Magnetic drug targeting has been proposed as means of concentrating therapeutic agents at a target site and the success of this approach has been demonstrated in a number of studies. However, the behavior of magnetic carriers in blood vessels and tumor microcirculation still remains unclear. In this work, we utilized polymeric magnetic nanocapsules (m-NCs) for magnetic targeting in tumors and dynamically visualized them within blood vessels and tumor tissues before, during and after magnetic field exposure using fibered confocal fluorescence microscopy (FCFM). Our results suggested that the distribution of m-NCs within tumor vasculature changed dramatically, but in a reversible way, upon application and removal of a magnetic field. The m-NCs were concentrated and stayed as clusters near a blood vessel wall when tumors were exposed to a magnetic field but without rupturing the blood vessel. The obtained FCFM images provided in vivo in situ microvascular observations of m-NCs upon magnetic targeting with high spatial resolution but minimally invasive surgical procedures. This proof-of-concept descriptive study in mice is envisaged to track and quantify nanoparticles in vivo in a non-invasive manner at microscopic resolution.Entities:
Keywords: Cellvizio®; Magnetic drug targeting; Nanomedicine; Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs); Tumor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27449744 PMCID: PMC5176088 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.07.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Control Release ISSN: 0168-3659 Impact factor: 9.776
Physicochemical characterization of PEGylated m-NCs with different SPION loadings prepared by a single emulsification/solvent evaporation method.
| Formulation | Hydrodynamic size (nm) | PDI | Zeta potential (mV) | SPION EE% | Final SPION loading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC 1 | 203 ± 4 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | − 45 ± 2 | — | 0.00 |
| NC 2 | 212 ± 2 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | − 38 ± 1 | 99 ± 3 | 0.08 ± 0.01 |
| NC 3 | 218 ± 4 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | − 39 ± 1 | 99 ± 2 | 0.38 ± 0.01 |
| NC 4 | 205 ± 3 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | − 36 ± 1 | 95 ± 3 | 1.76 ± 0.06 |
| NC 5 | 214 ± 9 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | − 31 ± 1 | 94 ± 9 | 6.60 ± 0.63 |
Size was measured with dynamic light scattering and measured in deionized water
Values were obtained with laser Doppler electrophoresis and measured in deionized water
Iron content was determined by ICP-MS
Weight of NCs includes polymer, lecithin, castor oil, SPION and tween 80®. Initial and final loading refers to SPION content before and after size exclusion chromatography.
Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3)
Physicochemical characterization of PEGylated DiR encapsulated NCs and m-NCs prepared by a single emulsification/solvent evaporation method.
| Formulation | Hydrodynamic size (nm) | PDI | Zeta potential (mV) | DiR EE% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC-DiR | 206 ± 5 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | -39 ± 2 | 99 ± 4 |
| 209 ± 2 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | -32 ± 1 | 95 ± 5 |
Formulations were prepared based on NC 4
Size was measured with dynamic light scattering and measured in deionized water
Values were obtained with laser Doppler electrophoresis and measured in deionized water
Values were determined by fluorescence spectroscopy
Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3)
Fig. 1Biodistribution studies of m-NC-111In in CT26 tumor-bearing BALB/c mice under the influence of a magnetic field. Mice were intravenously injected with NC-111In or m-NC-111In at SPION content of 0-500 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected at specified time points and organs and tumors were excised at 24 h post-injection. (a) Scatter plots of % ID of m-NCs in tumor tissue (24 h) without or with magnetic targeting as a function of natural log of SPION injection dose. The best-fit linear regression line is shown with a correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.9338 in tumor tissue upon magnetic targeting (p = 0.0337). (b) Blood circulation of NC 1-5 with an increasing amount of SPION. (c) Liver and spleen accumulation profiles of NC 1-5 at 24 h post-injection with an increasing amount of SPION. Results are expressed as % ID/g of organ as mean ± SEM (n=3). The linear regression in (a) was performed using Graphpad Prism 5.0. One-way ANOVA was performed using IBM SPSS version 20 followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test (**p < 0.01).
Fig. 2Real time fibered confocal fluorescence microscopic (FCFM) images of magnetic targeting in tumor tissues. Fluorescently labeled non-magnetic NC (NC-DiR) or magnetic NC (m-NC-DiR) (red signals) were injected intravenously into CT26 tumor-bearing BALB/c mice and imaged with FCFM using FITC-Dextran (green) as the vascular contrast agent. (a) Schematic illustration of the live FCFM imaging in tumor blood vessels with an external magnetic field (MF) applied at the external part of tumor without direct contact. (b) Representative single frame of live FCFM imaging of NC-DiR and m-NC-DiR in tumors before, during and after the application of the magnets. Dashed circle shows the magnetized m-NC-DiR, and not NC-DiR is concentrated in the blood vessels upon the application of a magnetic field. All images were acquired using the Cellvizio® dual band imaging system.
Fig. 3Experimental timeline of fibered confocal fluorescence microscopic (FCFM) imaging of m-NCs in tumor vasculature under the influence of a magnetic field (MF). CT26 tumor-bearing BALB/c mice were injected intravenously with m-NC-DiR and a magnet was applied only at one of the bifocal tumors (TU+) for 1 h. FCFM imaging was performed at 1, 4 and 24 h post-injection in both TU+ and TU-. Non-previously injected mouse was used for each time point. FITC-Dextran was injected intravenously at a dose of 500 mg/kg prior to each imaging time point as a macromolecular contrast agent. Inset (top) shows the dynamic FCFM imaging of m-NCs in tumor blood vessels during MF application to demonstrate the interaction of m-NCs and MF on a microscopic scale.
Fig. 4Fibered confocal fluorescence microscopic (FCFM) images of m-NCs in tumor tissues over time after the application of the magnetic field. m-NC-DiR were injected intravenously into CT26 tumor-bearing BALB/c mice and imaged with FCFM using FITC-Dextran as the vascular contrast agent. A magnetic field was taped at one of tumor surface (TU+) for 1 h and removed afterwards. The contralateral tumor (TU-) was used as a control. (a) Representative single frame FCFM images of m-NCs in TU- and TU+ at 1, 4 and 24 h post-injection. (b) Quantification of the fluorescence intensity of m-NC-DiR in TU- and TU+. Values are expressed as the ratio of fluorescence intensity from DiR and FITC as mean ± SD (n=3). Paired student t-test was performed using IBM SPSS version 20 (*p < 0.05).
Fig. 5Real-time fibered confocal fluorescence microscopic (FCFM) images of m-NCs in muscle and liver. m-NC-DiR were injected intravenously into CT26 tumor-bearing BALB/c mice and imaged with FCFM using FITC-Dextran as the vascular contrast agent. Representative single frame FCFM images of m-NC in muscle and liver tissues at 1, 4 and 24 h post-injection with the application of a magnetic field at the tumor. All images were acquired using the Cellvizio® dual band imaging system. Scale bar is 50 um.