Literature DB >> 21763736

Brain tumor targeting of magnetic nanoparticles for potential drug delivery: effect of administration route and magnetic field topography.

Beata Chertok1, Allan E David, Victor C Yang.   

Abstract

Our previous studies demonstrated feasibility of magnetically-mediated retention of iron oxide nanoparticles in brain tumors after intravascular administration. The purpose of this study was to elucidate strategies for further improvement of this promising approach. In particular, we explored administration of the nanoparticles via a non-occluded carotid artery as a way to increase the passive exposure of tumor vasculature to nanoparticles for subsequent magnetic entrapment. However, aggregation of nanoparticles in the afferent vasculature interfered with tumor targeting. The magnetic setup employed in our experiments was found to generate a relatively uniform magnetic flux density over a broad range, exposing the region of the afferent vasculature to high magnetic force. To overcome this problem, the magnetic setup was modified with a 9-mm diameter cylindrical NdFeB magnet to exhibit steeper magnetic field topography. Six-fold reduction of the magnetic force at the injection site, achieved with this modification, alleviated the aggregation problem under the conditions of intact carotid blood flow. Using this setup, carotid administration was found to present 1.8-fold increase in nanoparticle accumulation in glioma compared to the intravenous route at 350mT. This increase was found to be in reasonable agreement with the theoretically estimated 1.9-fold advantage of carotid administration, R(d). The developed approach is expected to present an even greater advantage when applied to drug-loaded nanoparticles exhibiting higher values of R(d).
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21763736      PMCID: PMC3196033          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  25 in total

Review 1.  The blood-brain and blood-tumor barriers: a review of strategies for increasing drug delivery.

Authors:  D R Groothuis
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Clinical developments in nanotechnology for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Jeremy D Heidel; Mark E Davis
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Effects of aging on cardiac output, regional blood flow, and body composition in Fischer-344 rats.

Authors:  M D Delp; M V Evans; C Duan
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1998-11

4.  Contributions of cell kill and posttreatment tumor growth rates to the repopulation of intracerebral 9L tumors after chemotherapy: an MRI study.

Authors:  B D Ross; Y J Zhao; E R Neal; L D Stegman; M Ercolani; O Ben-Yoseph; T L Chenevert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Flow-induced vascular remodeling in the rat carotid artery diminishes with age.

Authors:  J K Miyashiro; V Poppa; B C Berk
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Negative preclinical results with stealth nanospheres-encapsulated Doxorubicin in an orthotopic murine brain tumor model.

Authors:  Irène Brigger; Jackie Morizet; Lysiane Laudani; Geneviève Aubert; Martine Appel; Valérie Velasco; Marie-Josée Terrier-Lacombe; Didier Desmaële; Jean d'Angelo; Patrick Couvreur; Gilles Vassal
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  Magnetic drug targeting--biodistribution of the magnetic carrier and the chemotherapeutic agent mitoxantrone after locoregional cancer treatment.

Authors:  Christoph Alexiou; Roland Jurgons; Roswitha J Schmid; Christian Bergemann; Julia Henke; Wolf Erhardt; Ernst Huenges; Fritz Parak
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.121

8.  Distribution of radiolabeled 1-(4-amino-2-methyl-5-pyrimidinyl)methyl-3-(2-chloroethyl)-3-nitros ourea hydrochloride in rat brain tumor: intraarterial versus intravenous administration.

Authors:  K Yamada; Y Ushio; T Hayakawa; N Arita; T Y Huang; M Nagatani; N Yamada; H Mogami
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Magnetic targeting of microspheres in blood flow.

Authors:  C F Driscoll; R M Morris; A E Senyei; K J Widder; G S Heller
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.514

10.  Substantiating in vivo magnetic brain tumor targeting of cationic iron oxide nanocarriers via adsorptive surface masking.

Authors:  Beata Chertok; Allan E David; Bradford A Moffat; Victor C Yang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Treating metastatic cancer with nanotechnology.

Authors:  Avi Schroeder; Daniel A Heller; Monte M Winslow; James E Dahlman; George W Pratt; Robert Langer; Tyler Jacks; Daniel G Anderson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Polymeric magnetic nanoparticles: a multitargeting approach for brain tumour therapy and imaging.

Authors:  Bhavana Joshi; Abhijeet Joshi
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 4.617

3.  Magnetic targeting of nanoparticles across the intact blood-brain barrier.

Authors:  Seong Deok Kong; Jisook Lee; Srinivasan Ramachandran; Brian P Eliceiri; Veronica I Shubayev; Ratnesh Lal; Sungho Jin
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Trimethyl chitosan-cysteine nanoparticles for systemic delivery of TNF-α siRNA via oral and intraperitoneal routes.

Authors:  Chunbai He; Lichen Yin; Cui Tang; Chunhua Yin
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Pulsed magnetic field improves the transport of iron oxide nanoparticles through cell barriers.

Authors:  Kyoung Ah Min; Meong Cheol Shin; Faquan Yu; Meizhu Yang; Allan E David; Victor C Yang; Gus R Rosania
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 6.  Magnetic nanoparticles for tumor imaging and therapy: a so-called theranostic system.

Authors:  Huining He; Allan David; Beata Chertok; Adam Cole; Kyuri Lee; Jian Zhang; Jianxin Wang; Yongzhuo Huang; Victor C Yang
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 7.  Multifunctional nanoparticles for brain tumor imaging and therapy.

Authors:  Yu Cheng; Ramin A Morshed; Brenda Auffinger; Alex L Tobias; Maciej S Lesniak
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 8.  Bench-to-bedside translation of magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Dhirender Singh; JoEllyn M McMillan; Alexander V Kabanov; Marina Sokolsky-Papkov; Howard E Gendelman
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicology of theranostic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Homan Kang; Shrutika Mintri; Archita Venugopal Menon; Hea Yeon Lee; Hak Soo Choi; Jonghan Kim
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 10.  Nanoparticles for imaging: top or flop?

Authors:  Fabian Kiessling; Marianne E Mertens; Jan Grimm; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.