Literature DB >> 8840985

Clinical experiences with magnetic drug targeting: a phase I study with 4'-epidoxorubicin in 14 patients with advanced solid tumors.

A S Lübbe1, C Bergemann, H Riess, F Schriever, P Reichardt, K Possinger, M Matthias, B Dörken, F Herrmann, R Gürtler, P Hohenberger, N Haas, R Sohr, B Sander, A J Lemke, D Ohlendorf, W Huhnt, D Huhn.   

Abstract

Anticancer drugs reversibly bound to magnetic fluids (ferrofluids) could be concentrated in locally advanced tumors by magnetic fields that are arranged at the tumor surface outside of the organism. If certain requirements are met, systemic toxicity might be minimized, and local tumor efficacy might be increased. We have conducted a Phase I clinical trial using this approach in patients with advanced and unsuccessfully pretreated cancers or sarcomas. Nine such patients received two treatment courses, 3 patients received one course, and 2 patients received three courses of magnetic drug targeting consisting of the infusion of epirubicin in increasing doses (from 5 to 100 mg/m2) that had been chemically bound to a magnetic fluid and the application of magnetic fields to the tumors for 60-120 min. In 2 of 14 patients, the same dose of epirubicin not bound to a magnetic fluid was administered systemically 3 weeks after drug targeting for intraindividual comparisons. Magnetic drug targeting with epirubicin was well tolerated. In one case, a planned second treatment was withdrawn, because of an episode of chills 130 min after infusion of the magnetic drug. Two patients received a third treatment because of good responses after the first two therapies. Based on magnetic resonance tomographic techniques, pharmacokinetics, and the histological detection of magnetites, it was shown that the ferrofluid could be successfully directed to the tumors in about one-half of the patients. Organ toxicity did not increase with the treatment, but epirubicin-associated toxicity appeared at doses greater than 50 mg/m2. Although treatment with magnetic drug targeting seems safe, improvements are necessary to make it more effective and independent of patient- or disease-related problems. A study design to compare conventional treatments with the new treatment form within one patient seems crucial to eliminate interindividual differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8840985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  87 in total

1.  Magnetically-enabled and MR-monitored selective brain tumor protein delivery in rats via magnetic nanocarriers.

Authors:  Beata Chertok; Allan E David; Victor C Yang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  The Behaviors of Ferro-Magnetic Nano-Particles In and Around Blood Vessels under Applied Magnetic Fields.

Authors:  A Nacev; C Beni; O Bruno; B Shapiro
Journal:  J Magn Magn Mater       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.993

3.  Oh the irony: Iron as a cancer cause or cure?

Authors:  Susan P Foy; Vinod Labhasetwar
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Optical imaging and magnetic field targeting of magnetic nanoparticles in tumors.

Authors:  Susan P Foy; Rachel L Manthe; Steven T Foy; Sanja Dimitrijevic; Nishanth Krishnamurthy; Vinod Labhasetwar
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  [Magnetic drug targeting. New paths for the local concentration of drugs for head and neck cancer].

Authors:  C Simon
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Preparation and acute toxicology of nano-magnetic ferrofluid.

Authors:  Zefeng Xia; Guobin Wang; Kaixiong Tao; Jianxing Li; Yuan Tian
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2005

Review 7.  Physical methods of nucleic acid transfer: general concepts and applications.

Authors:  Julien Villemejane; Lluis M Mir
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Nanomagnetic-mediated drug delivery for the treatment of dental disease.

Authors:  Yadong Ji; Seung K Choi; Ahmed S Sultan; Kong Chuncai; Xiaoying Lin; Erfan Dashtimoghadam; Mary Anne Melo; Michael Weir; Huakun Xu; Lobat Tayebi; Zhihong Nie; Didier A Depireux; Radi Masri
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 9.  Magnetic nanoparticles in MR imaging and drug delivery.

Authors:  Conroy Sun; Jerry S H Lee; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 15.470

10.  Nanomedicine: Silence the target.

Authors:  Christian Plank
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 39.213

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.