Amira M Aker1, Deborah J Watkins1, Lauren E Johns1, Kelly K Ferguson1, Offie P Soldin2, Liza V Anzalota Del Toro3, Akram N Alshawabkeh4, José F Cordero3, John D Meeker5. 1. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, 3900 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA. 3. University of Puerto Rico Graduate School of Public Health, UPR Medical Sciences Campus, PO Box 365067, San Juan, PR 00936-5067, USA. 4. College of Engineering, Northeastern University, 110 Forsyth St, Boston, MA 02115, USA. 5. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: meekerj@umich.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Phenols and parabens are ubiquitous environmental contaminants. Evidence from animal studies and limited human data suggest they may be endocrine disruptors. In the current study, we examined associations of phenols and parabens with reproductive and thyroid hormones in 106 pregnant women recruited for the prospective cohort, "Puerto Rico Testsite for Exploring Contamination Threats (PROTECT)". METHODS: Urinary exposure biomarkers (bisphenol A, triclosan, benzophenone-3, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,5-dichlorophenol, butyl, methyl and propyl paraben) and serum hormone levels (estradiol, progesterone, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroid stimulating hormone) were measured at up to two time points during pregnancy (16-20 weeks and 24-28 weeks). We used linear mixed models to assess relationships between exposure biomarkers and hormone levels across pregnancy, controlling for urinary specific gravity, maternal age, BMI and education. In sensitivity analyses, we evaluated cross-sectional relationships between exposure and hormone levels stratified by study visit using linear regression. RESULTS: An IQR increase in methyl paraben was associated with a 7.70% increase (95% CI 1.50, 13.90) in SHBG. Furthermore, an IQR increase in butyl paraben as associated with an 8.46% decrease (95% CI 16.92, 0.00) in estradiol, as well as a 9.34% decrease (95% CI -18.31,-0.38) in estradiol/progesterone. Conversely, an IQR increase in butyl paraben was associated with a 5.64% increase (95% CI 1.26, 10.02) in FT4. Progesterone was consistently negatively associated with phenols, but none reached statistical significance. After stratification, methyl and propyl paraben were suggestively negatively associated with estradiol at the first time point (16-20 weeks), and suggestively positively associated with estradiol at the second time point (24-28 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Within this ongoing birth cohort, certain phenols and parabens were associated with altered reproductive and thyroid hormone levels during pregnancy. These changes may contribute to adverse health effects in mothers or their offspring, but additional research is required.
INTRODUCTION:Phenols and parabens are ubiquitous environmental contaminants. Evidence from animal studies and limited human data suggest they may be endocrine disruptors. In the current study, we examined associations of phenols and parabens with reproductive and thyroid hormones in 106 pregnant women recruited for the prospective cohort, "Puerto Rico Testsite for Exploring Contamination Threats (PROTECT)". METHODS: Urinary exposure biomarkers (bisphenol A, triclosan, benzophenone-3, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,5-dichlorophenol, butyl, methyl and propyl paraben) and serum hormone levels (estradiol, progesterone, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroid stimulating hormone) were measured at up to two time points during pregnancy (16-20 weeks and 24-28 weeks). We used linear mixed models to assess relationships between exposure biomarkers and hormone levels across pregnancy, controlling for urinary specific gravity, maternal age, BMI and education. In sensitivity analyses, we evaluated cross-sectional relationships between exposure and hormone levels stratified by study visit using linear regression. RESULTS: An IQR increase in methyl paraben was associated with a 7.70% increase (95% CI 1.50, 13.90) in SHBG. Furthermore, an IQR increase in butyl paraben as associated with an 8.46% decrease (95% CI 16.92, 0.00) in estradiol, as well as a 9.34% decrease (95% CI -18.31,-0.38) in estradiol/progesterone. Conversely, an IQR increase in butyl paraben was associated with a 5.64% increase (95% CI 1.26, 10.02) in FT4. Progesterone was consistently negatively associated with phenols, but none reached statistical significance. After stratification, methyl and propyl paraben were suggestively negatively associated with estradiol at the first time point (16-20 weeks), and suggestively positively associated with estradiol at the second time point (24-28 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Within this ongoing birth cohort, certain phenols and parabens were associated with altered reproductive and thyroid hormone levels during pregnancy. These changes may contribute to adverse health effects in mothers or their offspring, but additional research is required.
Authors: M Krause; A Klit; M Blomberg Jensen; T Søeborg; H Frederiksen; M Schlumpf; W Lichtensteiger; N E Skakkebaek; K T Drzewiecki Journal: Int J Androl Date: 2012-06
Authors: David E Cantonwine; José F Cordero; Luis O Rivera-González; Liza V Anzalota Del Toro; Kelly K Ferguson; Bhramar Mukherjee; Antonia M Calafat; Noe Crespo; Braulio Jiménez-Vélez; Ingrid Y Padilla; Akram N Alshawabkeh; John D Meeker Journal: Environ Int Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Jonathan Chevrier; Robert B Gunier; Asa Bradman; Nina T Holland; Antonia M Calafat; Brenda Eskenazi; Kim G Harley Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Xiaoyun Ye; Amber M Bishop; John A Reidy; Larry L Needham; Antonia M Calafat Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Kristen J Polinski; Dana Dabelea; Richard F Hamman; John L Adgate; Antonia M Calafat; Xiaoyun Ye; Anne P Starling Journal: Environ Res Date: 2018-02-04 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Anna Z Pollack; Sunni L Mumford; Jenna R Krall; Andrea E Carmichael; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Neil J Perkins; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Enrique F Schisterman Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Deborah J Watkins; Carmen M Vélez-Vega; Zaira Rosario; José F Cordero; Akram N Alshawabkeh; John D Meeker Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Amira M Aker; Lauren Johns; Thomas F McElrath; David E Cantonwine; Bhramar Mukherjee; John D Meeker Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Amira M Aker; Kelly K Ferguson; Zaira Y Rosario; Bhramar Mukherjee; Akram N Alshawabkeh; José F Cordero; John D Meeker Journal: Environ Res Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Mary E Ingle; Deborah Watkins; Zaira Rosario; Carmen M Vélez Vega; Gredia Huerta-Montanez; Antonia M Calafat; Maria Ospina; José F Cordero; Akram Alshawabkeh; John D Meeker Journal: Environ Res Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Kimberly Berger; Robert B Gunier; Jonathan Chevrier; Antonia M Calafat; Xiaoyun Ye; Brenda Eskenazi; Kim G Harley Journal: Environ Res Date: 2018-05-25 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Julianne Skarha; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Paige L Williams; Tim I M Korevaar; Ralph A de Poortere; Maarten A C Broeren; Jennifer B Ford; Melissa Eliot; Russ Hauser; Joseph M Braun Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 9.621