Literature DB >> 27448213

The assessment of non culprit coronary artery lesions in patients with ST segment elevated myocardial infarction and multivessel disease by control angiography with quantitative coronary angiography.

Esra Dönmez1, Mevlüt Koç2, Taner Şeker2, Yahya Kemal İçen2, Murat Çayli2.   

Abstract

Conflicting data is present in the literature about patients who are treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to the exaggeration of the non culprit artery. The precise understanding of the non culprit artery in the setting of ST segment elevated myocardial infarct (STEMI) is important since the time and modality of the treatment is planned accordingly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the lesions in the non culprit coronary artery during primary PCI and control coronary angiography (CAG) using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in multivessel STEMI patients. In this study, multivessel disease STEMI patients whom underwent primary PCI between January 2010 and March 2011 were included. Critical stenosis degree was accepted as ≥70 % in the non culprit artery. All patients were evaluated with control CAG 1 month after primary PCI. Assessment with CAG was performed by two blinded cardiologists. QCA program was used to evaluate reference artery diameter (RAD), minimum luminal diameter (MLD) and degree of stenosis. With regard to the degree of stenosis, significant reduction was accepted as ≥15 % while % 5-15 decrease was accepted as moderate. Of the 81 patients, 61 were males and 20 were females (mean age 58.1 ± 10). In the control CAG, the degree of non culprit artery stenosis was found to be decreased (p < 0.001) while RAD and MLD were increased (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively). Significant decrease in critical non culprit artery lesions was detected in 22 patients (20.9 %) meanwhile moderate reduction was observed in 26 patients (24.7 %). In 14 patients (13.3 %), non culprit artery lesions accepted as critical during primary PCI were found to be non critical during the control CAG. Planned intervention was cancelled and medical treatment was initiated in those 14 patients. Our data indicated using QCA, approximately the half of non culprit lesions were found less critical during control CAG when compared to primary PCI. Therefore, it is concluded that complete revascularization during primary PCI should be avoided in multivessel STEMI patients and critical non culprit artery lesions should be re-evaluated with later control CAG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non culprit artery; Primary PCI; Quantitative coronary angiography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27448213     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-0943-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  25 in total

1.  Non-culprit coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention during acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the APEX-AMI trial.

Authors:  Mustafa Toma; Christopher E Buller; Cynthia M Westerhout; Yuling Fu; William W O'Neill; David R Holmes; Christian W Hamm; Christopher B Granger; Paul W Armstrong
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Exaggeration of nonculprit stenosis severity during acute myocardial infarction: implications for immediate multivessel revascularization.

Authors:  Colm G Hanratty; Yutaka Koyama; Helge H Rasmussen; Greg I C Nelson; Peter S Hansen; Michael R Ward
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-09-04       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease and noninfarct-related artery revascularization on outcome of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the EUROTRANSFER Registry).

Authors:  Artur Dziewierz; Zbigniew Siudak; Tomasz Rakowski; Wojciech Zasada; Jacek S Dubiel; Dariusz Dudek
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Prognostic impact of staged versus "one-time" multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial.

Authors:  Ran Kornowski; Roxana Mehran; George Dangas; Eugenia Nikolsky; Abid Assali; Bimmer E Claessen; Bernard J Gersh; S Chiu Wong; Bernhard Witzenbichler; Giulio Guagliumi; Dariusz Dudek; Martin Fahy; Alexandra J Lansky; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Culprit vessel only versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pairwise and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pieter J Vlaar; Karim D Mahmoud; David R Holmes; Gert van Valkenhoef; Hans L Hillege; Iwan C C van der Horst; Felix Zijlstra; Bart J G L de Smet
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Increased plasma endothelin-1 in the early hours of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D J Stewart; G Kubac; K B Costello; P Cernacek
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  J S Hochman; L A Sleeper; J G Webb; T A Sanborn; H D White; J D Talley; C E Buller; A K Jacobs; J N Slater; J Col; S M McKinlay; T H LeJemtel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Change of multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a study with coronary angiography.

Authors:  Sang-Gon Lee; Cheol Whan Lee; Myeong-Ki Hong; Jae-Joong Kim; Seong-Wook Park; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Outcome of urgent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: comparison of single-vessel versus multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  B E Jaski; J D Cohen; J Trausch; D G Marsh; G R Bail; P A Overlie; E W Skowronski; S C Smith
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Paul Sorajja; Bernard J Gersh; David A Cox; Michael G McLaughlin; Peter Zimetbaum; Costantino Costantini; Thomas Stuckey; James E Tcheng; Roxana Mehran; Alexandra J Lansky; Cindy L Grines; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI: a Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Daniel Y Lu; Ming Zhong; Dmitriy N Feldman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-04-07

2.  Cardiovascular imaging 2016 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Vande Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.357

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.