Literature DB >> 21816305

Prognostic impact of staged versus "one-time" multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial.

Ran Kornowski1, Roxana Mehran, George Dangas, Eugenia Nikolsky, Abid Assali, Bimmer E Claessen, Bernard J Gersh, S Chiu Wong, Bernhard Witzenbichler, Giulio Guagliumi, Dariusz Dudek, Martin Fahy, Alexandra J Lansky, Gregg W Stone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare a one-time primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit and nonculprit lesions with PCI of only the culprit lesion and staged nonculprit PCI at a later date in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease.
BACKGROUND: In patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, it is unknown whether it is safe or even desirable to also treat the nonculprit vessel during the primary PCI procedure.
METHODS: In the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, 668 of the 3,602 STEMI patients enrolled (18.5%) underwent PCI of culprit and nonculprit lesions for multivessel disease. Patients were categorized into a single PCI strategy (n = 275) versus staged PCI (n = 393). The endpoints analyzed included the 1-year rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and its components, death, reinfarction, target-vessel revascularization for ischemia, and stroke.
RESULTS: Single versus staged PCI was associated with higher 1-year mortality (9.2% vs. 2.3%; hazard ratio [HR]: 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.93 to 8.86, p < 0.0001), cardiac mortality (6.2% vs. 2.0%; HR: 3.14, 95% CI: 1.35 to 7.27, p = 0.005), definite/probable stent thrombosis (5.7% vs. 2.3%; HR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.09 to 5.70, p = 0.02), and a trend toward greater major adverse cardiovascular events (18.1% vs. 13.4%; HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.96 to 2.1, p = 0.08). The mortality advantage favoring staged PCI was maintained in a subgroup of patients undergoing truly elective multivessel PCI. Also, the staged PCI strategy was independently associated with lower all-cause mortality at 30 days and at 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: A deferred angioplasty strategy of nonculprit lesions should remain the standard approach in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, as multivessel PCI may be associated with a greater hazard for mortality and stent thrombosis. (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction [HORIZONS-AMI]; NCT00433966).
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21816305     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  56 in total

Review 1.  Multivessel versus culprit-only revascularization: one time versus staged procedures for the ACS population.

Authors:  Pablo Codner; Ran Kornowski
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Controversies in the treatment of patients with STEMI and multivessel disease: is it time for PCI of all lesions?

Authors:  Peter Ong; Udo Sechtem
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Acute coronary syndromes in 2013: Optimizing revascularization strategies in patients with ACS.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Value of gated-SPECT MPI for ischemia-guided PCI of non-culprit vessels in STEMI patients with multivessel disease after primary PCI.

Authors:  Lawrence M Phillips; João V Vitola; Leslee J Shaw; Raffaele Giubbini; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Erick Alexanderson; Maurizio Dondi; Diana Paez; Amalia Peix
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Dennis T L Wong; James D Richardson; Rishi Puri; Adam J Nelson; Angela G Bertaso; Karen S L Teo; Matthew I Worthley; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.

Authors:  Birgit Vogel; Shamir R Mehta; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Network Meta-Analysis of Percutaneous Intervention-Based Revascularization Strategies for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Concomitant Multi-Vessel Disease.

Authors:  Urooj Fatima; Safi U Khan; Olabisi Akanbi; Saket Girotra; Isaac Opoku-Asare
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2018-08-28

8.  Preliminary Report on the Safety and Efficacy of Staged versus Complete Revascularization in Patients with Multivessel Disease at the Time of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Marwan Saad; Ahmed Rashed; Wael El-Kilany; Mohamed El-Haddad; Islam Y Elgendy
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2016-02-18

Review 9.  Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.

Authors:  Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Elisa Filippini; Pier Camillo Pavesi; Gianfranco Tortorici; Gianni Casella; Pietro Sangiorgio
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.397

10.  The assessment of non culprit coronary artery lesions in patients with ST segment elevated myocardial infarction and multivessel disease by control angiography with quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  Esra Dönmez; Mevlüt Koç; Taner Şeker; Yahya Kemal İçen; Murat Çayli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.