Literature DB >> 20530505

Non-culprit coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention during acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the APEX-AMI trial.

Mustafa Toma1, Christopher E Buller, Cynthia M Westerhout, Yuling Fu, William W O'Neill, David R Holmes, Christian W Hamm, Christopher B Granger, Paul W Armstrong.   

Abstract

AIMS: To examine the incidence of and propensity for non-culprit interventions performed at the time of the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and its association with 90-day outcomes. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We examined the incidence, propensity for, and associated 90-day outcomes following non-culprit interventions performed at the time of primary PCI among ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MVD). Of the 5373 patients who underwent primary PCI in the APEX-AMI trial, 2201 had MVD. Of those, 217 (9.9%) underwent non-infarct-related arteries (IRA) PCI, whereas 1984 (90.1%) underwent PCI of the IRA alone. Ninety-day death and death/CHF/shock were higher in the non-IRA group compared with the IRA-only PCI group (12.5 vs. 5.6%, P (log-rank) < 0.001 and 17.4 vs. 12.0%, P (log-rank) = 0.020, respectively). After adjusting for patient and procedural characteristics as well as propensity for performing non-IRA PCI, this procedure remained independently associated with an increased hazard of 90-day mortality [adjusted hazard ratio 2.44, 95% CI (1.55-3.83), P < 0.001].
CONCLUSION: Non-culprit coronary interventions were performed at the time of primary PCI in 10% of MVD patients and were significantly associated with increased mortality. Our data support current guideline recommendations discouraging the performance of such procedures in stable primary PCI patients. Prospective randomized study of this issue may be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20530505     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  53 in total

Review 1.  Ubiquitin-free routes into the proteasome.

Authors:  M A Hoyt; P Coffino
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Multivessel versus culprit-only revascularization: one time versus staged procedures for the ACS population.

Authors:  Pablo Codner; Ran Kornowski
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Controversies in the treatment of patients with STEMI and multivessel disease: is it time for PCI of all lesions?

Authors:  Peter Ong; Udo Sechtem
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Clinical outcomes of complete revascularization using either angiography-guided or fractional flow reserve-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in non-culprit vessels in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients: insights from a study based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexandre Hideo-Kajita; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Kayode O Kuku; Solomon S Beyene; Viana Azizi; Yael F Meirovich; Gebremedhin D Melaku; Aaphtaab Dheendsa; Echo J Brathwaite; Sameer Desale; Mohammad Soud; Kazuhiro Dan; Yuichi Ozaki; Ron Waksman; Michael Lipinski
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Value of gated-SPECT MPI for ischemia-guided PCI of non-culprit vessels in STEMI patients with multivessel disease after primary PCI.

Authors:  Lawrence M Phillips; João V Vitola; Leslee J Shaw; Raffaele Giubbini; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Erick Alexanderson; Maurizio Dondi; Diana Paez; Amalia Peix
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Dennis T L Wong; James D Richardson; Rishi Puri; Adam J Nelson; Angela G Bertaso; Karen S L Teo; Matthew I Worthley; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.

Authors:  Birgit Vogel; Shamir R Mehta; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 8.  Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.

Authors:  Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Elisa Filippini; Pier Camillo Pavesi; Gianfranco Tortorici; Gianni Casella; Pietro Sangiorgio
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.397

9.  Initial culprit-only versus initial multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Ibaraki Cardiovascular Assessment Study registry.

Authors:  Daisuke Abe; Akira Sato; Tomoya Hoshi; Noriyuki Takeyasu; Masako Misaki; Mayu Hayashi; Kazutaka Aonuma
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  The assessment of non culprit coronary artery lesions in patients with ST segment elevated myocardial infarction and multivessel disease by control angiography with quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  Esra Dönmez; Mevlüt Koç; Taner Şeker; Yahya Kemal İçen; Murat Çayli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.