Literature DB >> 27444927

Comparative effectiveness of breast MRI and mammography in screening young women with elevated risk of developing breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Anand K Narayan1, Kala Visvanathan2, Susan C Harvey3.   

Abstract

Screening guidelines recommend that women with 20 % or greater lifetime risk of breast cancer undergo annual breast MRI screening to supplement mammography, irrespective of age. In patients less than 40 years, mammography is often avoided due to concerns about radiation and decreased performance. However, prior studies have been limited by large percentages of women above 40 with decreased breast density. Our purpose was to test whether adding mammography to breast MRI screening compared to breast MRI screening alone in women below 40 increases cancer detection rates. After obtaining IRB approval, chart review identified patients aged 25-40 years undergoing breast MR screening (2005-2014). Demographics, risk factors, BI-RADS assessments, background parenchymal enhancement, and mammographic breast tissue density were recorded. Cancer detection rates, short-term follow-up (BIRADS 3), image-guided biopsy (BIRADS 4,5), and PPV1-3 were calculated. 342 breast MRI exams were identified (average age was 33, 37 % were nulliparous, and 64 % had prior benign biopsy), 226 (66 %) of which underwent concurrent mammography. Risk factors included 64 % with breast cancer in first-degree relative(s), 90 % had heterogeneous or extremely dense breast tissue on mammography, and 16 % were BRCA carriers. Four invasive cancers were detected by MRI (11.7 cancers/1000 examinations, 95 % CI 8.3, 15.1). None of these was detected by mammography, and no cancers were independently identified by mammography. Breast MRI screening in high-risk women under 40 yielded elevated cancer detection rates (11.7/1000). The cancer detection rate for mammography was 0 %, suggesting that MRI alone may be useful in screening high-risk women under 40.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; High-risk women; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27444927     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3912-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  13 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Women: Is MRI Alone Enough?

Authors:  Carolina Rossi Saccarelli; Almir G V Bitencourt; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Multimodal breast cancer imaging using coregistered dynamic diffuse optical tomography and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bernhard B Zimmermann; Bin Deng; Bhawana Singh; Mark Martino; Juliette Selb; Qianqian Fang; Amir Y Sajjadi; Jayne Cormier; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans; David A Boas; Mansi A Saksena; Stefan A Carp
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Breast cancer detection and tumor characteristics in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Julia Krammer; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Mark E Robson; Mithat Gönen; Blanca Bernard-Davila; Elizabeth A Morris; Debra A Mangino; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Breast cancer cases of female patients under 35 years of age in Togo: A series of 158 cases.

Authors:  Tchin Darré; Mazamaesso Tchaou; Koué Folligan; Abdoulatif Amadou; Bidamin N'Timon; Lantam Sonhaye; Abdoul-Samadou Aboubakari; Koffi Amégbor; Koffi Akpadza; Gado Napo Koura
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-18

5.  Breast Cancer Screening Practices for High-Risk Women: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  Anne Blaes; Rachel I Vogel; Rebekah H Nagler; Alicia Allen; Susan Mason; Deanna Teoh; Kristine Talley; Nancy C Raymond; Jean F Wyman
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 6.  Breast cancer screening for women at high risk: review of current guidelines from leading specialty societies.

Authors:  Natsuko Onishi; Masako Kataoka
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 7.  Functions of Breast Cancer Predisposition Genes: Implications for Clinical Management.

Authors:  Akiyo Yoshimura; Issei Imoto; Hiroji Iwata
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.208

8.  Breast Cancer Screening Strategies for Women With ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 Pathogenic Variants: A Comparative Modeling Analysis.

Authors:  Kathryn P Lowry; H Amarens Geuzinge; Natasha K Stout; Oguzhan Alagoz; John Hampton; Karla Kerlikowske; Harry J de Koning; Diana L Miglioretti; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Clyde Schechter; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Donald Weaver; Martin J Yaffe; Jennifer M Yeh; Fergus J Couch; Chunling Hu; Peter Kraft; Eric C Polley; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Allison W Kurian; Mark E Robson
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 33.006

Review 9.  Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Christiane K Kuhl; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI.

Authors:  Suzan Vreemann; Jan C M van Zelst; Margrethe Schlooz-Vries; Peter Bult; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Nico Karssemeijer; Albert Gubern-Mérida; Ritse M Mann
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.