Literature DB >> 35175286

Breast Cancer Screening Strategies for Women With ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 Pathogenic Variants: A Comparative Modeling Analysis.

Kathryn P Lowry1, H Amarens Geuzinge2, Natasha K Stout3, Oguzhan Alagoz4, John Hampton5, Karla Kerlikowske6,7, Harry J de Koning2, Diana L Miglioretti8, Nicolien T van Ravesteyn2, Clyde Schechter9, Brian L Sprague10,11, Anna N A Tosteson12, Amy Trentham-Dietz5, Donald Weaver13, Martin J Yaffe14,15, Jennifer M Yeh16, Fergus J Couch17, Chunling Hu17, Peter Kraft18, Eric C Polley19, Jeanne S Mandelblatt20, Allison W Kurian21,22, Mark E Robson23.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Screening mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are recommended for women with ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 pathogenic variants. However, there are few data to guide screening regimens for these women.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening strategies using mammography and MRI at various start ages for women with ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 pathogenic variants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This comparative modeling analysis used 2 established breast cancer microsimulation models from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) to evaluate different screening strategies. Age-specific breast cancer risks were estimated using aggregated data from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium for 32 247 cases and 32 544 controls in 12 population-based studies. Data on screening performance for mammography and MRI were estimated from published literature. The models simulated US women with ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 pathogenic variants born in 1985.
INTERVENTIONS: Screening strategies with combinations of annual mammography alone and with MRI starting at age 25, 30, 35, or 40 years until age 74 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Estimated lifetime breast cancer mortality reduction, life-years gained, breast cancer deaths averted, total screening examinations, false-positive screenings, and benign biopsies per 1000 women screened. Results are reported as model mean values and ranges.
RESULTS: The mean model-estimated lifetime breast cancer risk was 20.9% (18.1%-23.7%) for women with ATM pathogenic variants, 27.6% (23.4%-31.7%) for women with CHEK2 pathogenic variants, and 39.5% (35.6%-43.3%) for women with PALB2 pathogenic variants. Across pathogenic variants, annual mammography alone from 40 to 74 years was estimated to reduce breast cancer mortality by 36.4% (34.6%-38.2%) to 38.5% (37.8%-39.2%) compared with no screening. Screening with annual MRI starting at 35 years followed by annual mammography and MRI at 40 years was estimated to reduce breast cancer mortality by 54.4% (54.2%-54.7%) to 57.6% (57.2%-58.0%), with 4661 (4635-4688) to 5001 (4979-5023) false-positive screenings and 1280 (1272-1287) to 1368 (1362-1374) benign biopsies per 1000 women. Annual MRI starting at 30 years followed by mammography and MRI at 40 years was estimated to reduce mortality by 55.4% (55.3%-55.4%) to 59.5% (58.5%-60.4%), with 5075 (5057-5093) to 5415 (5393-5437) false-positive screenings and 1439 (1429-1449) to 1528 (1517-1538) benign biopsies per 1000 women. When starting MRI at 30 years, initiating annual mammography starting at 30 vs 40 years did not meaningfully reduce mean mortality rates (0.1% [0.1%-0.2%] to 0.3% [0.2%-0.3%]) but was estimated to add 649 (602-695) to 650 (603-696) false-positive screenings and 58 (41-76) to 59 (41-76) benign biopsies per 1000 women. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This analysis suggests that annual MRI screening starting at 30 to 35 years followed by annual MRI and mammography at 40 years may reduce breast cancer mortality by more than 50% for women with ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 pathogenic variants. In the setting of MRI screening, mammography prior to 40 years may offer little additional benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35175286      PMCID: PMC8855312          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   33.006


  51 in total

1.  Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Natasha K Stout; Clyde B Schechter; Jeroen J van den Broek; Diana L Miglioretti; Martin Krapcho; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Diego Munoz; Sandra J Lee; Donald A Berry; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Oguzhan Alagoz; Karla Kerlikowske; Anna N A Tosteson; Aimee M Near; Amanda Hoeffken; Yaojen Chang; Eveline A Heijnsdijk; Gary Chisholm; Xuelin Huang; Hui Huang; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Ronald Gangnon; Brian L Sprague; Sylvia Plevritis; Eric Feuer; Harry J de Koning; Kathleen A Cronin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States).

Authors:  Leslie Bernstein; Mark Allen; Hoda Anton-Culver; Dennis Deapen; Pamela L Horn-Ross; David Peel; Richard Pinder; Peggy Reynolds; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Dee West; William Wright; Al Ziogas; Ronald K Ross
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Should we screen BRCA1 mutation carriers only with MRI? A multicenter study.

Authors:  Inge-Marie Obdeijn; Gonneke A O Winter-Warnars; Ritse M Mann; Maartje J Hooning; M G Myriam Hunink; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.

Authors:  Marije F Bakker; Stéphanie V de Lange; Ruud M Pijnappel; Ritse M Mann; Petra H M Peeters; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Marleen J Emaus; Claudette E Loo; Robertus H C Bisschops; Marc B I Lobbes; Matthijn D F de Jong; Katya M Duvivier; Jeroen Veltman; Nico Karssemeijer; Harry J de Koning; Paul J van Diest; Willem P T M Mali; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Wouter B Veldhuis; Carla H van Gils
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Differences in natural history between breast cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and effects of MRI screening-MRISC, MARIBS, and Canadian studies combined.

Authors:  Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Ellen Warner; Fiona J Gilbert; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Gareth Evans; Petrina A Causer; Rosalind A Eeles; Reinie Kaas; Gerrit Draisma; Elizabeth A Ramsay; Ruth M L Warren; Kimberly A Hill; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Martin N J M Wasser; Elisabeth Bergers; Jan C Oosterwijk; Maartje J Hooning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn; Don B Plewes; Martin O Leach; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  The MISCAN-Fadia continuous tumor growth model for breast cancer.

Authors:  Sita Y G L Tan; Gerrit J van Oortmarssen; Harry J de Koning; Rob Boer; J Dik F Habbema
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2006

7.  The American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort: rationale, study design, and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Eugenia E Calle; Carmen Rodriguez; Eric J Jacobs; M Lyn Almon; Ann Chao; Marjorie L McCullough; Heather S Feigelson; Michael J Thun
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Optimizing colorectal cancer screening by race and sex: Microsimulation analysis II to inform the American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guideline.

Authors:  Reinier G S Meester; Elisabeth F P Peterse; Amy B Knudsen; Anne C de Weerdt; Jennifer C Chen; Anna P Lietz; Andrea Dwyer; Dennis J Ahnen; Rebecca L Siegel; Robert A Smith; Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Breast Cancer Risk Genes - Association Analysis in More than 113,000 Women.

Authors:  Leila Dorling; Sara Carvalho; Jamie Allen; Anna González-Neira; Craig Luccarini; Cecilia Wahlström; Karen A Pooley; Michael T Parsons; Cristina Fortuno; Qin Wang; Manjeet K Bolla; Joe Dennis; Renske Keeman; M Rosario Alonso; Nuria Álvarez; Belen Herraez; Victoria Fernandez; Rocio Núñez-Torres; Ana Osorio; Jeanette Valcich; Minerva Li; Therese Törngren; Patricia A Harrington; Caroline Baynes; Don M Conroy; Brennan Decker; Laura Fachal; Nasim Mavaddat; Thomas Ahearn; Kristiina Aittomäki; Natalia N Antonenkova; Norbert Arnold; Patrick Arveux; Margreet G E M Ausems; Päivi Auvinen; Heiko Becher; Matthias W Beckmann; Sabine Behrens; Marina Bermisheva; Katarzyna Białkowska; Carl Blomqvist; Natalia V Bogdanova; Nadja Bogdanova-Markov; Stig E Bojesen; Bernardo Bonanni; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Hiltrud Brauch; Michael Bremer; Ignacio Briceno; Thomas Brüning; Barbara Burwinkel; David A Cameron; Nicola J Camp; Archie Campbell; Angel Carracedo; Jose E Castelao; Melissa H Cessna; Stephen J Chanock; Hans Christiansen; J Margriet Collée; Emilie Cordina-Duverger; Sten Cornelissen; Kamila Czene; Thilo Dörk; Arif B Ekici; Christoph Engel; Mikael Eriksson; Peter A Fasching; Jonine Figueroa; Henrik Flyger; Asta Försti; Marike Gabrielson; Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Vassilios Georgoulias; Fabian Gil; Graham G Giles; Gord Glendon; Encarna B Gómez Garcia; Grethe I Grenaker Alnæs; Pascal Guénel; Andreas Hadjisavvas; Lothar Haeberle; Eric Hahnen; Per Hall; Ute Hamann; Elaine F Harkness; Jaana M Hartikainen; Mikael Hartman; Wei He; Bernadette A M Heemskerk-Gerritsen; Peter Hillemanns; Frans B L Hogervorst; Antoinette Hollestelle; Weang Kee Ho; Maartje J Hooning; Anthony Howell; Keith Humphreys; Faiza Idris; Anna Jakubowska; Audrey Jung; Pooja Middha Kapoor; Michael J Kerin; Elza Khusnutdinova; Sung-Won Kim; Yon-Dschun Ko; Veli-Matti Kosma; Vessela N Kristensen; Kyriacos Kyriacou; Inge M M Lakeman; Jong Won Lee; Min Hyuk Lee; Jingmei Li; Annika Lindblom; Wing-Yee Lo; Maria A Loizidou; Artitaya Lophatananon; Jan Lubiński; Robert J MacInnis; Michael J Madsen; Arto Mannermaa; Mehdi Manoochehri; Siranoush Manoukian; Sara Margolin; Maria Elena Martinez; Tabea Maurer; Dimitrios Mavroudis; Catriona McLean; Alfons Meindl; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Kyriaki Michailidou; Nicola Miller; Nur Aishah Mohd Taib; Kenneth Muir; Anna Marie Mulligan; Heli Nevanlinna; William G Newman; Børge G Nordestgaard; Pei-Sze Ng; Jan C Oosterwijk; Sue K Park; Tjoung-Won Park-Simon; Jose I A Perez; Paolo Peterlongo; David J Porteous; Karolina Prajzendanc; Darya Prokofyeva; Paolo Radice; Muhammad U Rashid; Valerie Rhenius; Matti A Rookus; Thomas Rüdiger; Emmanouil Saloustros; Elinor J Sawyer; Rita K Schmutzler; Andreas Schneeweiss; Peter Schürmann; Mitul Shah; Christof Sohn; Melissa C Southey; Harald Surowy; Maija Suvanto; Somchai Thanasitthichai; Ian Tomlinson; Diana Torres; Thérèse Truong; Maria Tzardi; Yana Valova; Christi J van Asperen; Rob M Van Dam; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Lizet E van der Kolk; Elke M van Veen; Camilla Wendt; Justin A Williams; Xiaohong R Yang; Sook-Yee Yoon; M Pilar Zamora; D Gareth Evans; Miguel de la Hoya; Jacques Simard; Antonis C Antoniou; Åke Borg; Irene L Andrulis; Jenny Chang-Claude; Montserrat García-Closas; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Roger L Milne; Paul D P Pharoah; Marjanka K Schmidt; Amanda B Spurdle; Maaike P G Vreeswijk; Javier Benitez; Alison M Dunning; Anders Kvist; Soo H Teo; Peter Devilee; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The supplemental value of mammographic screening over breast MRI alone in BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Inge-Marie Obdeijn; Ritse M Mann; Claudette C E Loo; Marc Lobbes; Eleonora M C Voormolen; Carolien H M van Deurzen; Geertruida de Bock; Maartje J Hooning
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  5 in total

1.  Differences in Cancer Phenotypes Among Frequent CHEK2 Variants and Implications for Clinical Care-Checking CHEK2.

Authors:  Brittany L Bychkovsky; Nihat B Agaoglu; Carolyn Horton; Jing Zhou; Amal Yussuf; Parichehr Hemyari; Marcy E Richardson; Colin Young; Holly LaDuca; Deborah L McGuinness; Rochelle Scheib; Judy E Garber; Huma Q Rana
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 33.006

Review 2.  Functions of Breast Cancer Predisposition Genes: Implications for Clinical Management.

Authors:  Akiyo Yoshimura; Issei Imoto; Hiroji Iwata
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Cost-Effectiveness of Genetic Testing for All Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer in China.

Authors:  Li Sun; Bin Cui; Xia Wei; Zia Sadique; Li Yang; Ranjit Manchanda; Rosa Legood
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Atypical, Composite, or Blended Phenotypes: How Different Molecular Mechanisms Could Associate in Double-Diagnosed Patients.

Authors:  Erica Rosina; Lidia Pezzani; Laura Pezzoli; Daniela Marchetti; Matteo Bellini; Alba Pilotta; Olga Calabrese; Emanuele Nicastro; Francesco Cirillo; Anna Cereda; Agnese Scatigno; Donatella Milani; Maria Iascone
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.141

Review 5.  From Immunohistochemistry to New Digital Ecosystems: A State-of-the-Art Biomarker Review for Precision Breast Cancer Medicine.

Authors:  Sean M Hacking; Evgeny Yakirevich; Yihong Wang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 6.575

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.