Kathryn P Lowry1, H Amarens Geuzinge2, Natasha K Stout3, Oguzhan Alagoz4, John Hampton5, Karla Kerlikowske6,7, Harry J de Koning2, Diana L Miglioretti8, Nicolien T van Ravesteyn2, Clyde Schechter9, Brian L Sprague10,11, Anna N A Tosteson12, Amy Trentham-Dietz5, Donald Weaver13, Martin J Yaffe14,15, Jennifer M Yeh16, Fergus J Couch17, Chunling Hu17, Peter Kraft18, Eric C Polley19, Jeanne S Mandelblatt20, Allison W Kurian21,22, Mark E Robson23. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle. 2. Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison. 5. Carbone Cancer Center, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison. 6. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. 7. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco. 8. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis. 9. Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. 10. Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington. 11. Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington. 12. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire. 13. Department of Pathology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington. 14. Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 15. Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 16. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 17. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, New York. 18. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 19. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 20. Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. 21. Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 22. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 23. Department of Breast Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Screening mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are recommended for women with ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 pathogenic variants. However, there are few data to guide screening regimens for these women. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening strategies using mammography and MRI at various start ages for women with ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 pathogenic variants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This comparative modeling analysis used 2 established breast cancer microsimulation models from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) to evaluate different screening strategies. Age-specific breast cancer risks were estimated using aggregated data from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium for 32 247 cases and 32 544 controls in 12 population-based studies. Data on screening performance for mammography and MRI were estimated from published literature. The models simulated US women with ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 pathogenic variants born in 1985. INTERVENTIONS: Screening strategies with combinations of annual mammography alone and with MRI starting at age 25, 30, 35, or 40 years until age 74 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Estimated lifetime breast cancer mortality reduction, life-years gained, breast cancer deaths averted, total screening examinations, false-positive screenings, and benign biopsies per 1000 women screened. Results are reported as model mean values and ranges. RESULTS: The mean model-estimated lifetime breast cancer risk was 20.9% (18.1%-23.7%) for women with ATM pathogenic variants, 27.6% (23.4%-31.7%) for women with CHEK2 pathogenic variants, and 39.5% (35.6%-43.3%) for women with PALB2 pathogenic variants. Across pathogenic variants, annual mammography alone from 40 to 74 years was estimated to reduce breast cancer mortality by 36.4% (34.6%-38.2%) to 38.5% (37.8%-39.2%) compared with no screening. Screening with annual MRI starting at 35 years followed by annual mammography and MRI at 40 years was estimated to reduce breast cancer mortality by 54.4% (54.2%-54.7%) to 57.6% (57.2%-58.0%), with 4661 (4635-4688) to 5001 (4979-5023) false-positive screenings and 1280 (1272-1287) to 1368 (1362-1374) benign biopsies per 1000 women. Annual MRI starting at 30 years followed by mammography and MRI at 40 years was estimated to reduce mortality by 55.4% (55.3%-55.4%) to 59.5% (58.5%-60.4%), with 5075 (5057-5093) to 5415 (5393-5437) false-positive screenings and 1439 (1429-1449) to 1528 (1517-1538) benign biopsies per 1000 women. When starting MRI at 30 years, initiating annual mammography starting at 30 vs 40 years did not meaningfully reduce mean mortality rates (0.1% [0.1%-0.2%] to 0.3% [0.2%-0.3%]) but was estimated to add 649 (602-695) to 650 (603-696) false-positive screenings and 58 (41-76) to 59 (41-76) benign biopsies per 1000 women. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This analysis suggests that annual MRI screening starting at 30 to 35 years followed by annual MRI and mammography at 40 years may reduce breast cancer mortality by more than 50% for women with ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 pathogenic variants. In the setting of MRI screening, mammography prior to 40 years may offer little additional benefit.
IMPORTANCE: Screening mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are recommended for women with ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 pathogenic variants. However, there are few data to guide screening regimens for these women. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening strategies using mammography and MRI at various start ages for women with ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 pathogenic variants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This comparative modeling analysis used 2 established breast cancer microsimulation models from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) to evaluate different screening strategies. Age-specific breast cancer risks were estimated using aggregated data from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium for 32 247 cases and 32 544 controls in 12 population-based studies. Data on screening performance for mammography and MRI were estimated from published literature. The models simulated US women with ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 pathogenic variants born in 1985. INTERVENTIONS: Screening strategies with combinations of annual mammography alone and with MRI starting at age 25, 30, 35, or 40 years until age 74 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Estimated lifetime breast cancer mortality reduction, life-years gained, breast cancer deaths averted, total screening examinations, false-positive screenings, and benign biopsies per 1000 women screened. Results are reported as model mean values and ranges. RESULTS: The mean model-estimated lifetime breast cancer risk was 20.9% (18.1%-23.7%) for women with ATM pathogenic variants, 27.6% (23.4%-31.7%) for women with CHEK2 pathogenic variants, and 39.5% (35.6%-43.3%) for women with PALB2 pathogenic variants. Across pathogenic variants, annual mammography alone from 40 to 74 years was estimated to reduce breast cancer mortality by 36.4% (34.6%-38.2%) to 38.5% (37.8%-39.2%) compared with no screening. Screening with annual MRI starting at 35 years followed by annual mammography and MRI at 40 years was estimated to reduce breast cancer mortality by 54.4% (54.2%-54.7%) to 57.6% (57.2%-58.0%), with 4661 (4635-4688) to 5001 (4979-5023) false-positive screenings and 1280 (1272-1287) to 1368 (1362-1374) benign biopsies per 1000 women. Annual MRI starting at 30 years followed by mammography and MRI at 40 years was estimated to reduce mortality by 55.4% (55.3%-55.4%) to 59.5% (58.5%-60.4%), with 5075 (5057-5093) to 5415 (5393-5437) false-positive screenings and 1439 (1429-1449) to 1528 (1517-1538) benign biopsies per 1000 women. When starting MRI at 30 years, initiating annual mammography starting at 30 vs 40 years did not meaningfully reduce mean mortality rates (0.1% [0.1%-0.2%] to 0.3% [0.2%-0.3%]) but was estimated to add 649 (602-695) to 650 (603-696) false-positive screenings and 58 (41-76) to 59 (41-76) benign biopsies per 1000 women. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This analysis suggests that annual MRI screening starting at 30 to 35 years followed by annual MRI and mammography at 40 years may reduce breast cancer mortality by more than 50% for women with ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 pathogenic variants. In the setting of MRI screening, mammography prior to 40 years may offer little additional benefit.
Authors: Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Natasha K Stout; Clyde B Schechter; Jeroen J van den Broek; Diana L Miglioretti; Martin Krapcho; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Diego Munoz; Sandra J Lee; Donald A Berry; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Oguzhan Alagoz; Karla Kerlikowske; Anna N A Tosteson; Aimee M Near; Amanda Hoeffken; Yaojen Chang; Eveline A Heijnsdijk; Gary Chisholm; Xuelin Huang; Hui Huang; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Ronald Gangnon; Brian L Sprague; Sylvia Plevritis; Eric Feuer; Harry J de Koning; Kathleen A Cronin Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Leslie Bernstein; Mark Allen; Hoda Anton-Culver; Dennis Deapen; Pamela L Horn-Ross; David Peel; Richard Pinder; Peggy Reynolds; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Dee West; William Wright; Al Ziogas; Ronald K Ross Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Inge-Marie Obdeijn; Gonneke A O Winter-Warnars; Ritse M Mann; Maartje J Hooning; M G Myriam Hunink; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Marije F Bakker; Stéphanie V de Lange; Ruud M Pijnappel; Ritse M Mann; Petra H M Peeters; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Marleen J Emaus; Claudette E Loo; Robertus H C Bisschops; Marc B I Lobbes; Matthijn D F de Jong; Katya M Duvivier; Jeroen Veltman; Nico Karssemeijer; Harry J de Koning; Paul J van Diest; Willem P T M Mali; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Wouter B Veldhuis; Carla H van Gils Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Ellen Warner; Fiona J Gilbert; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Gareth Evans; Petrina A Causer; Rosalind A Eeles; Reinie Kaas; Gerrit Draisma; Elizabeth A Ramsay; Ruth M L Warren; Kimberly A Hill; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Martin N J M Wasser; Elisabeth Bergers; Jan C Oosterwijk; Maartje J Hooning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn; Don B Plewes; Martin O Leach; Harry J de Koning Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Eugenia E Calle; Carmen Rodriguez; Eric J Jacobs; M Lyn Almon; Ann Chao; Marjorie L McCullough; Heather S Feigelson; Michael J Thun Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-05-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Reinier G S Meester; Elisabeth F P Peterse; Amy B Knudsen; Anne C de Weerdt; Jennifer C Chen; Anna P Lietz; Andrea Dwyer; Dennis J Ahnen; Rebecca L Siegel; Robert A Smith; Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Leila Dorling; Sara Carvalho; Jamie Allen; Anna González-Neira; Craig Luccarini; Cecilia Wahlström; Karen A Pooley; Michael T Parsons; Cristina Fortuno; Qin Wang; Manjeet K Bolla; Joe Dennis; Renske Keeman; M Rosario Alonso; Nuria Álvarez; Belen Herraez; Victoria Fernandez; Rocio Núñez-Torres; Ana Osorio; Jeanette Valcich; Minerva Li; Therese Törngren; Patricia A Harrington; Caroline Baynes; Don M Conroy; Brennan Decker; Laura Fachal; Nasim Mavaddat; Thomas Ahearn; Kristiina Aittomäki; Natalia N Antonenkova; Norbert Arnold; Patrick Arveux; Margreet G E M Ausems; Päivi Auvinen; Heiko Becher; Matthias W Beckmann; Sabine Behrens; Marina Bermisheva; Katarzyna Białkowska; Carl Blomqvist; Natalia V Bogdanova; Nadja Bogdanova-Markov; Stig E Bojesen; Bernardo Bonanni; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Hiltrud Brauch; Michael Bremer; Ignacio Briceno; Thomas Brüning; Barbara Burwinkel; David A Cameron; Nicola J Camp; Archie Campbell; Angel Carracedo; Jose E Castelao; Melissa H Cessna; Stephen J Chanock; Hans Christiansen; J Margriet Collée; Emilie Cordina-Duverger; Sten Cornelissen; Kamila Czene; Thilo Dörk; Arif B Ekici; Christoph Engel; Mikael Eriksson; Peter A Fasching; Jonine Figueroa; Henrik Flyger; Asta Försti; Marike Gabrielson; Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Vassilios Georgoulias; Fabian Gil; Graham G Giles; Gord Glendon; Encarna B Gómez Garcia; Grethe I Grenaker Alnæs; Pascal Guénel; Andreas Hadjisavvas; Lothar Haeberle; Eric Hahnen; Per Hall; Ute Hamann; Elaine F Harkness; Jaana M Hartikainen; Mikael Hartman; Wei He; Bernadette A M Heemskerk-Gerritsen; Peter Hillemanns; Frans B L Hogervorst; Antoinette Hollestelle; Weang Kee Ho; Maartje J Hooning; Anthony Howell; Keith Humphreys; Faiza Idris; Anna Jakubowska; Audrey Jung; Pooja Middha Kapoor; Michael J Kerin; Elza Khusnutdinova; Sung-Won Kim; Yon-Dschun Ko; Veli-Matti Kosma; Vessela N Kristensen; Kyriacos Kyriacou; Inge M M Lakeman; Jong Won Lee; Min Hyuk Lee; Jingmei Li; Annika Lindblom; Wing-Yee Lo; Maria A Loizidou; Artitaya Lophatananon; Jan Lubiński; Robert J MacInnis; Michael J Madsen; Arto Mannermaa; Mehdi Manoochehri; Siranoush Manoukian; Sara Margolin; Maria Elena Martinez; Tabea Maurer; Dimitrios Mavroudis; Catriona McLean; Alfons Meindl; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Kyriaki Michailidou; Nicola Miller; Nur Aishah Mohd Taib; Kenneth Muir; Anna Marie Mulligan; Heli Nevanlinna; William G Newman; Børge G Nordestgaard; Pei-Sze Ng; Jan C Oosterwijk; Sue K Park; Tjoung-Won Park-Simon; Jose I A Perez; Paolo Peterlongo; David J Porteous; Karolina Prajzendanc; Darya Prokofyeva; Paolo Radice; Muhammad U Rashid; Valerie Rhenius; Matti A Rookus; Thomas Rüdiger; Emmanouil Saloustros; Elinor J Sawyer; Rita K Schmutzler; Andreas Schneeweiss; Peter Schürmann; Mitul Shah; Christof Sohn; Melissa C Southey; Harald Surowy; Maija Suvanto; Somchai Thanasitthichai; Ian Tomlinson; Diana Torres; Thérèse Truong; Maria Tzardi; Yana Valova; Christi J van Asperen; Rob M Van Dam; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Lizet E van der Kolk; Elke M van Veen; Camilla Wendt; Justin A Williams; Xiaohong R Yang; Sook-Yee Yoon; M Pilar Zamora; D Gareth Evans; Miguel de la Hoya; Jacques Simard; Antonis C Antoniou; Åke Borg; Irene L Andrulis; Jenny Chang-Claude; Montserrat García-Closas; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Roger L Milne; Paul D P Pharoah; Marjanka K Schmidt; Amanda B Spurdle; Maaike P G Vreeswijk; Javier Benitez; Alison M Dunning; Anders Kvist; Soo H Teo; Peter Devilee; Douglas F Easton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Inge-Marie Obdeijn; Ritse M Mann; Claudette C E Loo; Marc Lobbes; Eleonora M C Voormolen; Carolien H M van Deurzen; Geertruida de Bock; Maartje J Hooning Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 4.872