Literature DB >> 27441894

Staphylococcus aureus SrrAB Affects Susceptibility to Hydrogen Peroxide and Co-Existence with Streptococcus sanguinis.

Yuichi Oogai1, Miki Kawada-Matsuo1, Hitoshi Komatsuzawa1.   

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogen and a commensal bacterial species that is found in humans. Bacterial two-component systems (TCSs) sense and respond to environmental stresses, which include antimicrobial agents produced by other bacteria. In this study, we analyzed the relation between the TCS SrrAB and susceptibility to the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) that is produced by Streptococcus sanguinis, which is a commensal oral streptococcus. An srrA-inactivated S. aureus mutant demonstrated low susceptibility to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis. We investigated the expression of anti-oxidant factors in the mutant. The expression of katA in the mutant was significantly higher than in the wild-type (WT) in the presence or absence of 0.4 mM H2O2. The expression of dps in the mutant was significantly increased compared with the WT in the presence of H2O2 but not in the absence of H2O2. A katA or a dps-inactivated mutant had high susceptibility to H2O2 compared with WT. In addition, we found that the nitric oxide detoxification protein (flavohemoglobin: Hmp), which is regulated by SrrAB, was related to H2O2 susceptibility. The hmp-inactivated mutant had slightly lower susceptibility to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis than did WT. When a srrA-inactivated mutant or the WT were co-cultured with S. sanguinis, the population percentage of the mutant was significantly higher than the WT. In conclusion, SrrAB regulates katA, dps and hmp expression and affects H2O2 susceptibility. Our findings suggest that SrrAB is related in vivo to the co-existence of S. aureus with S. sanguinis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27441894      PMCID: PMC4956065          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a human pathogen that causes several diseases such as suppurative diseases, food poisoning and toxic shock syndrome [1, 2]. Recently, methicillin-resistant S. aureus epidemics in hospitals have become a worldwide health problem [3-5]. S. aureus is a commensal bacterium found in humans that has been isolated from the skin and nasal mucosa of healthy subjects with a frequency of 20 to 60% [6, 7]. Additionally, S. aureus is known to inhabit the oral cavity, including the oral mucosa, gingiva and dental plaque [8-10]. In a commensal bacterial flora, many bacteria produce anti-bacterial agents such as bacteriocins [11, 12] and hydrogen peroxide compete with other bacterium [13-15]. It was demonstrated in virginal flora that H2O2-producing lactobacilli inhibited the growth of pathogens [16, 17]. In oral flora, viridans group streptococci produced H2O2 and had an antagonistic effect on pathogens [13-15]. Streptococcus sanguinis is an oral bacterium that is found primarily in dental plaques and has been reported to be an H2O2-producing species. Several reports have demonstrated that the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis can kill other oral bacterial species [18, 19]. Uehara et al. reported that viridans group streptococci containing S. sanguinis inhibit colonization with S. aureus in newborns, which has been attributed to H2O2 [20, 21]. On the other hand, S. aureus was reported to possess several factors that confer resistance to H2O2, such as catalase (KatA), alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AhpC) and DNA-binding proteins from starved cells (Dps) [22-24]. KatA and AhpC are enzymes that decompose H2O2. Dps is an inhibitor of hydroxyl radical (·OH) production from H2O2 in the presence of iron via the Fenton chemistry. Therefore, the biological relevance of interactions between S. sanguinis, a resident of the oral cavity, and S. aureus is uncertain. Two-component systems (TCSs) are composed of a sensor kinase and a response regulator and are bacterial-specific gene regulation systems. When a sensor kinase senses a stimulant in the extracellular environment, the response regulator is phosphorylated and regulates several genes to facilitate adaptation to the environment [25]. Recently, several TCSs have been reported to be important for adaptation to H2O2 stress. In Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Haemophilus influenzae, ArcAB has an oxygen sensing function and is essential for resisting reactive oxygen species, including H2O2 [26-28]. In S. aureus, Sun et al. demonstrated that two TCSs (AgrCA and AirSR) affected the susceptibility to H2O2 [29, 30]. The TCS SrrAB is a known oxygen sensor in S. aureus and regulates several virulence genes under low oxygen conditions [31-33], as well as anaerobic metabolism genes and a flavohemoglobin hmp under low oxygen conditions or upon exposure to nitric oxide (NO) [34, 35]. However, the relation between susceptibility to H2O2 and SrrAB is unknown. In this study, we investigated the effects of SrrAB on susceptibility to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. S. aureus was grown in 5 ml of tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, MD, USA) in test tubes (18 mm diameter × 150 mm tall) at 37°C under aerobic conditions with shaking (120 rpm). S. sanguinis was aerobically grown in 5 ml of TSB in test tubes (18 mm diameter × 150 mm tall) at 37°C under 5% CO2 without shaking. Tetracycline (Tc; 5 μg / ml) and chloramphenicol (Cp; 3 μg / ml) were added for the maintenance of S. aureus mutant strains. Ampicillin (100 μg / ml) and spectinomycin (50 μg / ml) were added for the maintenance of E. coli mutant strains.
Table 1

Strains and plasmids used in this study.

Strains or plasmidsDescriptionReferences or source
Staphylococcus aureus
 MW2Clinical strain, sepsis, methicillin resistant (mecA+)[59]
 TY34Clinical strain, impetigo, methicillin resistant (mecA+)[37]
 RN4220Restriction-deficient transformation recipient[40]
 MW2 ΔsrrAsrrA::pCL52.1 in MW2, Tcr[36]
 MW2 srrAB compl.srrAB complemented in MW2 ΔsrrA by pYO10, Tcr CprThis study
 TY34 ΔsrrAsrrA::pCL52.1 in TY34, Tcr[37]
 TY34 srrAB compl.srrAB complemented in TY34 ΔsrrA by pYO10, Tcr CprThis study
 MW2 Δhmphmp::pCL52.1 in MW2, TcrThis study
 MW2 Δdpsdps::pCL52.1 in MW2, TcrThis study
 MW2 ΔkatAkatA::pCL52.1 in MW2, TcrThis study
 MW2 ΔperRperR::pCL52.1 in MW2, TcrThis study
 MW2::pCL8MW2 harbouring pCL8, CprThis study
Streptococcus sanguinis
 GTC217Ofloxacin resistanceGTC
Escherichia coli
 XLII-BlueendA1 supE44 thi-1 hsdR17 recA1 gyrA96 relA1 lac [F’ proAB lacIqZΔM15 Tn10 (Tetr) Amy Camr]Stratagene
Plasmids
 pCL52.1E. coliS. aureus shuttle vector, thermosensitive replicon of pE194, Tcr (S. aureus), Spcr (E. coli)[39]
 pCL8E. coliS. aureus shuttle vector, Cpr (S. aureus), Ampr (E. coli)[39]
 pYO10pCL8 containing a PCR fragment of srrAB for complementationThis study

Tcr, resistant to tetracycline; Cpr, resistant to chloramphenicol; Spcr, resistant to spectinomycin; Ampr, resistant to ampicillin; GTC, gifu type culture.

Tcr, resistant to tetracycline; Cpr, resistant to chloramphenicol; Spcr, resistant to spectinomycin; Ampr, resistant to ampicillin; GTC, gifu type culture.

Construction of S. aureus mutants

The srrA-inactivated mutants were previously constructed [36, 37]. The genes dps, katA, hmp and perR were inactivated in S. aureus strain MW2 using the thermosensitive plasmid pCL52.1 by a previously described method [38]. Gene complementation was performed in the srrA-inactivated mutants using pCL8, which is an E. coli-S. aureus shuttle vector [39]. Entire sequences of srrAB with their own promoters were amplified by PCR. The amplified DNA was cloned into the pCL8 vector using E. coli XLII-Blue cells. The constructs were purified and electroporated into S. aureus RN4220, which was the recipient for the foreign plasmid [40]. Then, the plasmid was transduced into the mutant strains using the phage 80 alpha [41]. As a control strain for co-culture assays, strain MW2 harbouring the empty pCL8 was constructed. The primers used are listed in Table 2.
Table 2

Primers used in this study.

Gene nameForward primerReverse primer
For gene inactivation
hmp5’- TTCAAGCTTGGGCAAAAGCATATGGCG5’- GCGGGATCCTGATGGCTTGCGATACTG
dps5’- GTTAAGCTTGAATTGAATCAACAAGTAGC5’- TTAGGATCCTCTACTGATGTTTGCATACC
katA5’- AAAAAGCTTCTGAAATAGGTAAGCAAACC5’- AATGGATCCTCTTTATGGTTTTTAGCTTG
perR5’- ACAAAGCTTAGACAAGCAATATTACG5’- AAAGGATCCCATATGCTGAGCTAATC
For complementation
srrAB5’- TTAGGATCCGTATGCGCTTTCCTGTG5’- AGTGGATCCTCAATAACATGCGTTCTG
For quantitative PCR
 16s rRNA5’- CCTTATGATTTGGGCTAC5’- TACAATCCGAACTGAGAACA
katA5’- AAAGGTTCTGGTGCATTTGG5’- AACGCAAATCCTCGAATGTC
ahpC5’- TTATCGACCCAGACGGTGTT5’- TAGCGCCTTCTTCCCATTTA
dps5’- CGGTAGGAGGAA ACCCTGTA5’- TGATACATCATCGCCAGCAT
hmp5’- AAGGCTATATTGGCGCTGAA5’- TGCAACGCTTAGTCTTGGAA
cidA5’—TAGCCGGCAGTATTGTTGGT5’—AATTTCGGAAGCAACATCCA
perR5’—ACAAGCAGGCGTAAGAAT5’—GTCGCAACACTTATATTTGG

Restriction sites are underlined.

Restriction sites are underlined.

Direct assay for evaluating susceptibility to H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis

The direct assay method was modified from a previously described method [42]. A total of 5 μl of S. sanguinis (108 cells / ml) was dropped onto a tryptic soy agar (TSA) plate. After 16 h of aerobic incubation at 37°C under 5% CO2, the mid-log phase (cell density 660 nm = 0.8) of S. aureus strains (107 cells) mixed with 6 ml of pre-warmed tryptic soy soft agar (0.5% agar) was poured over the plates. The plates were incubated overnight at 37°C under aerobic conditions. To analyze the effects of anaerobic conditions on the production of an antibacterial agent, S. sanguinis was grown on TSA plates anaerobically using a GasPak system (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Then, after pouring tryptic soy soft agar containing S. aureus, the plate was incubated overnight at 37°C under anaerobic conditions. To neutralize the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis, 20 μl of bovine liver catalase (100 μg / ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dropped onto the area surrounding the S. sanguinis colony, and the direct assay was performed under aerobic conditions. The diameter of the S. aureus inhibition zone was measured in three directions to evaluate the inhibitory size. Three independent experiments were performed and are expressed as the mean ± SD.

H2O2 susceptibility test

Mid-log phase (cell density at 660 nm = 0.8) S. aureus strains were washed with PBS and re-suspended in TSB. Then, 0.5 × 108 cells were inoculated into 10 ml of TSB or TSB containing 0.4 mM H2O2 in a test tube (18 mm diameter × 150 mm tall) and grown aerobically at 37°C with shaking at 120 rpm. Bacterial growth was monitored to measure the bacterial density (OD 660 nm) for 2 to 10 h using the spectraphotometer miniphoto 518R (Taitec Corporation, Saitama, Japan).

Quantitative PCR

A small amount of the S. aureus strains (108 cells) was inoculated in 10 ml of TSB and grown aerobically to mid-log phase (cell density at 660 nm = 0.8) at 37°C with shaking at 120 rpm. The cultures were transferred to a centrifuge tube and treated with or without 0.4 mM H2O2 for 10 min at 37°C with shaking (120 rpm). RNA extraction was performed using a FastRNA Pro Blue Kit (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. One microgram of total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). Using cDNA as the template, quantitative PCR was performed using a LightCycler Nano (Roche Diagnostics). The primers used are listed in Table 2. Transcriptional levels were determined using 2-ΔΔCt methods [43]. The Ct value of 16S rRNA in 1000-fold diluted cDNA was used as a reference. The means of Ct values in WT untreated with H2O2 (N = 5) were used as the calibrator. All test and calibrator samples were normalized to the ΔCt value (ΔCt(test) = Ct(target test)-(reference test), ΔCt(calibrator) = Ct(target calibrator)-(reference calibrator). Then, the ΔΔCt value was determined (ΔΔCt = ΔCt(test)-ΔCt(calibrator)). The relative expression level was calculated using the formula F = 2-ΔΔCt. Individual experiments were performed three or five times, and the results expressed as the mean ± SD.

Co-culture assay

Co-culture assays were performed using a previously described method [42]. Mid-log phase cells (cell density at 660 nm = 0.8) of the S. sanguinis and S. aureus strains were adjusted to 2 × 108 cells / ml using PBS. The same volume of S. aureus and S. sanguinis was mixed and 20 μl of the mixture was dropped onto a TSA plate. The plate was incubated for 2 h at 37°C under 5% CO2. The agar in the spotted area was excised and incorporated into 500 μl of PBS. Then, the agar was vigorously mixed to detach the bacterial cells from the agar. Appropriate dilutions were plated on TSA plates containing Cp (3 μg / ml), Tc (5 μg / ml), or ofloxacin (Oflx) (1 μg / ml) because of different susceptibilities to antibiotics. WT S. aureus (MW2::pCL8) were selected with Cp. S. aureus mutants, and complemented strains were selected with Tc. S. sanguinis was selected with Oflx. After an overnight incubation at 37°C under 5% CO2, CFUs were determined, and the population percentage for each S. aureus strain was calculated. To analyze the effects of pre-culturing S. sanguinis, ten microliters of S. sanguinis (108 cells / ml) was dropped onto a TSA plate and the plate was incubated for 1 h at 37°C under 5% CO2. Then, ten microliters of S. aureus (108 cells / ml) was dropped onto a S. sanguinis colony and the plate was incubated for 2 h at 37°C under 5% CO2. The population percentage of S. aureus was determined by the method described above. Three independent experiments were performed and the results are expressed as the mean ± SD.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with statistical software EZR version 1.32 (http://www.jichi.ac.jp/saitama-sct/SaitamaHP.files/statmedEN.html).

Results

Susceptibility of the srrA-inactivated mutants to H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis

A direct assay demonstrated that the srrA-inactivated MW2 mutant showed a small inhibition zone surrounding S. sanguinis compared with the WT and that the small zone of the mutant was restored by complementation with srrAB (Fig 1A and 1C). Additionally, we investigated the susceptibility of an srrA-inactivated TY34 mutant to S. sanguinis and found that the mutant had a small inhibition zone compared with the WT (Fig 1C). Under anaerobic conditions, S. aureus WT showed no inhibition zone, and no inhibition zone was observed after catalase treatment (Fig 1B). In the growth curve experiment, the growth of the srrA-inactivated mutant was higher than the WT in the presence of 0.4 mM H2O2. Statistical significance was observed between WT and the mutant in the presence of 0.4 mM H2O2 at 10 h incubation. This phenotype in the mutant was restored by complementation with srrAB (Fig 2).
Fig 1

Susceptibility of the S. aureus srrA-inactivated mutant to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis.

(A) The susceptibilities of the S. aureus MW2 WT, MW2 srrA-inactivated mutant and the complemented strain to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis were analyzed by direct assay, as described in the Materials and Methods section. (B) The susceptibility of MW2 WT to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis was determined by direct assay under anaerobic conditions or with catalase treatment. (C) The inhibition zone diameters of S. aureus strains were measured. The data are the mean ± SD of three biological independent experiments. Significant differences compared with WT were determined by Dunnett’s test (**, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).

Fig 2

Susceptibility of the srrA-inactivated mutant to H2O2.

The bacterial density (OD 660 nm) of S. aureus MW2 WT, ΔsrrA and srrAB compl. grown in TSB or TSB containing 0.4 mM H2O2 was measured as described in the Materials and Methods. The data shown represent the means ± SD of three biological independent experiments. Significant differences between the WT and the srrA-inactivated mutant grown in TSB containing 0.4 mM H2O2 were calculated by student’s t-test.

Susceptibility of the S. aureus srrA-inactivated mutant to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis.

(A) The susceptibilities of the S. aureus MW2 WT, MW2 srrA-inactivated mutant and the complemented strain to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis were analyzed by direct assay, as described in the Materials and Methods section. (B) The susceptibility of MW2 WT to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis was determined by direct assay under anaerobic conditions or with catalase treatment. (C) The inhibition zone diameters of S. aureus strains were measured. The data are the mean ± SD of three biological independent experiments. Significant differences compared with WT were determined by Dunnett’s test (**, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).

Susceptibility of the srrA-inactivated mutant to H2O2.

The bacterial density (OD 660 nm) of S. aureus MW2 WT, ΔsrrA and srrAB compl. grown in TSB or TSB containing 0.4 mM H2O2 was measured as described in the Materials and Methods. The data shown represent the means ± SD of three biological independent experiments. Significant differences between the WT and the srrA-inactivated mutant grown in TSB containing 0.4 mM H2O2 were calculated by student’s t-test.

Expression of anti-oxidant factors and hmp in the srrA-inactivated mutant

We used quantitative PCR to investigate the expression of three anti-oxidant factors (katA, dps and ahpC) in the srrA-inactivated mutant exposed to 0.4 mM H2O2 for 10 min. The expression of these three factors in the WT, the srrA-inactivated mutant and the complemented strain was increased by H2O2 treatment. Compared with WT, the expression of katA was significantly higher in the mutant in the presence or absence of H2O2 treatment. The high level was restored in the srrAB-complemented strain. The expression of dps in the mutant did not increase in the absence of H2O2, but the expression was significantly higher in the mutant treated with H2O2. The increased expression in the mutant was restored by complementation. The expression of ahpC in the mutant was slightly increased, but the expression was decreased in the mutant compared to the WT when treated with H2O2 (Fig 3).
Fig 3

Expression of genes involved in the resistance to oxidative stress and hmp.

The expression of katA, dps, ahpC and hmp in S. aureus MW2 WT, srrA-inactivated mutant and the complemented strain incubated with or without 0.4 mM H2O2 was determined by quantitative PCR as described in the Materials and Methods section. The data are the mean ± SD of five biological independent experiments. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; N.S., not significant by Tukey's honestly significant difference test.

Expression of genes involved in the resistance to oxidative stress and hmp.

The expression of katA, dps, ahpC and hmp in S. aureus MW2 WT, srrA-inactivated mutant and the complemented strain incubated with or without 0.4 mM H2O2 was determined by quantitative PCR as described in the Materials and Methods section. The data are the mean ± SD of five biological independent experiments. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; N.S., not significant by Tukey's honestly significant difference test. Next, we focused on the expression of hmp because hmp expression is regulated by SrrAB in S. aureus [34, 35] and is related to oxidative stress in S. enterica Serovar Typhimurium [44, 45]. The expression of hmp in the srrA-inactivated mutant was significantly less than in WT treated or untreated with H2O2. The expression pattern in the complemented strain was similar to that of WT. The expression of hmp in the WT was increased 2.4-fold by H2O2 treatment (Fig 3).

Susceptibility of H2O2 and expression of anti-oxidant factors in the perR-inactivated mutant

PerR is related to the regulation of anti-oxidant factors in S. aureus [46]. We analyzed the susceptibility of the perR-inactivated mutant to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis. As shown in Fig 4A, a perR-inactivated mutant strain had significantly lower susceptibility to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis than the srrA-inactivated mutant. The expression of katA, dps and ahpC was significantly increased in the perR-inactivated mutant in the absence of H2O2 (Fig 4B).
Fig 4

Susceptibility to H2O2 and expression of katA, dps and ahpC in the perR-inactive mutant.

(A) The susceptibilities of S. aureus MW2, the srrA-inactivated mutant and the perR-inactivated mutant to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis were determined by direct assay under aerobic conditions (5% CO2). (B) The expression of katA, dps and ahpC in S. aureus MW2 WT and in the perR-inactivated mutant grown in TSB to mid-log phase was determined by quantitative PCR as described in the Materials and Methods section. The data shown represent the mean ± SD of three biological independent experiments. Significant differences compared with WT were determined by Student’s t-test (***, P < 0.001).

Susceptibility to H2O2 and expression of katA, dps and ahpC in the perR-inactive mutant.

(A) The susceptibilities of S. aureus MW2, the srrA-inactivated mutant and the perR-inactivated mutant to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis were determined by direct assay under aerobic conditions (5% CO2). (B) The expression of katA, dps and ahpC in S. aureus MW2 WT and in the perR-inactivated mutant grown in TSB to mid-log phase was determined by quantitative PCR as described in the Materials and Methods section. The data shown represent the mean ± SD of three biological independent experiments. Significant differences compared with WT were determined by Student’s t-test (***, P < 0.001).

Susceptibility of the katA, dps or hmp-inactivated mutant to H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis

Because the expression of the two factors (katA and dps) was increased in the srrA-inactivated mutant treated with H2O2, we constructed a mutant at each locus and performed a direct assay to identify the factor(s) that affected susceptibility to H2O2. The katA and dps-inactivated mutants had a large inhibition zone compared with the WT (Fig 5). Additionally, we analyzed the susceptibility of the hmp-inactivated mutant to H2O2, and found that the mutant had a small inhibition zone compared with the WT (Fig 5).
Fig 5

Susceptibility of the katA, dps or hmp-inactivated mutant to H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis.

(A) The susceptibilities of the S. aureus MW2 WT, MW2 katA, dps or hmp-inactivated mutants to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis were analyzed by direct assay, as described in the Materials and Methods section. (B) The diameter of the inhibition zone of S. aureus strains were measured. The data are the mean ± SD of three biological independent experiments. Significant differences compared with WT were determined by Dunnett’s test (***, P < 0.001).

Susceptibility of the katA, dps or hmp-inactivated mutant to H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis.

(A) The susceptibilities of the S. aureus MW2 WT, MW2 katA, dps or hmp-inactivated mutants to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis were analyzed by direct assay, as described in the Materials and Methods section. (B) The diameter of the inhibition zone of S. aureus strains were measured. The data are the mean ± SD of three biological independent experiments. Significant differences compared with WT were determined by Dunnett’s test (***, P < 0.001).

Co-culture of the S. aureus srrA-inactivated mutant with S. sanguinis

In a preliminary experiment, we demonstrated that the strain MW2 harbouring an empty pCL8 vector (MW2::pCL8) showed an inhibition zone similar to that of strain MW2 with no vector (S1 Fig). Therefore, we used this strain as a WT control for the co-culture assays. Additionally, we analyzed the growth of each S. aureus strain and S. sanguinis on TSA plates for 2 h and found that the growth was approximately the same among the S. aureus strains but that S. sanguinis grew approximately 2-fold more rapidly compared to the S. aureus strains (S1 Table). Fig 6A shows the population percentages for the S. aureus strains co-cultured with S. sanguinis for 2 h. The mutant population was approximately 2-fold larger than the WT. Fig 6B shows the population percentages of the S. aureus strains when S. sanguinis was pre-cultured on a TSA plate for a 1 h. Before the co-culture assay, we demonstrated in a preliminary experiment that the number of S. sanguinis cells increased 4-fold after 1 h incubation when S. sanguinis cells alone were spotted on a TSA plate (S1 Table). The mutant population was 18-fold larger than that of the WT.
Fig 6

Co-culture of the srrA-inactivated mutant with S. sanguinis.

(A) The population percentages of S. aureus MW2 WT harbouring an empty pCL8 vector (MW2::pCL8), the srrA-inactivated mutant and the complemented strain when co-cultured with S. sanguinis were measured by co-culture assay as described in the Materials and Methods section. (B) The population percentage of MW2 strains co-cultured with pre-cultured (37°C under 5% CO2 for 1 h) S. sanguinis. The data are the mean ± SD of three biological independent experiments. Significant differences compared with WT were determined by Dunnett’s test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.001).

Co-culture of the srrA-inactivated mutant with S. sanguinis.

(A) The population percentages of S. aureus MW2 WT harbouring an empty pCL8 vector (MW2::pCL8), the srrA-inactivated mutant and the complemented strain when co-cultured with S. sanguinis were measured by co-culture assay as described in the Materials and Methods section. (B) The population percentage of MW2 strains co-cultured with pre-cultured (37°C under 5% CO2 for 1 h) S. sanguinis. The data are the mean ± SD of three biological independent experiments. Significant differences compared with WT were determined by Dunnett’s test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.001).

Discussion

We demonstrated in this study that an srrA-inactivated mutant has a smaller inhibition zone surrounding S. sanguinis than does the WT by a direct assay and that this inhibition was completely relieved by anaerobic incubation or catalase treatment (Fig 1). In addition, the mutant had a low susceptibility to H2O2 (Fig 2). Therefore, the small inhibition zone of the srrA mutant was caused by the low susceptibility to the H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis. Additionally, we demonstrated that the expression of both katA and dps was increased in the mutant exposed to H2O2 (Fig 3). Based on these findings, we concluded that the low susceptibility of the srrA mutant to H2O2 was primarily due to the increased expression of katA and dps. SrrAB acts as a sensor for low oxygen tension and NO and regulates several factors that facilitate adaptation to these conditions. SrrAB regulates several virulence genes (tst, spa and icaA) under anaerobic or low oxygen conditions [31-33]. The expression of genes involved in anaerobic respiratory pathways (pflAB, adhE and nrdDG), cytochrome assembly and biosynthesis (qoxABCD, cydAB and hemABCX), iron-sulfur cluster repair (scdA) and NO detoxification protein (hmp) were altered in the srrAB mutant under low oxygen or NO stress conditions [34, 35]. Furthermore, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (plc) was regulated via SrrAB by hypochlorous acid or polymorphonuclear leukocytes [47]. However, the regulation of katA and dps by SrrAB has not been demonstrated. Recently, Windham et al. reported that SrrAB modulates S. aureus (strain UAMS-1) cell death in high glucose conditions and that an srrAB mutant had increased susceptibility to H2O2. They attributed the increased susceptibility to H2O2 in the srrAB mutant to the production of endogenous reactive oxygen species by the expression of cidABC via SrrAB [48]. This report contains results conflicting with our results using S. aureus strain MW2 and TY34 (Figs 1 and 2). We investigated the expression of cidA in the srrA mutant of MW2 and found that the expression of cidA was significantly repressed by SrrAB (S2 Fig). Therefore, we think that the effect of cidA in the srrA mutant is not much below the background of MW2 and TY34. Previously, Horsburgh et al. reported that katA and dps expression in S. aureus was repressed by PerR, which is a Fur family protein [46]. As shown in Fig 4A, a perR-inactivated mutant showed lower susceptibility to H2O2 than the srrA-inactivated mutant. Therefore, we analyzed the relation between SrrAB and PerR. First, we investigated perR gene expression in the srrA-inactivated mutant and found that perR gene expression was unaltered (S3 Fig). Then, we investigated the expression of anti-oxidant factors, and found a higher expression of katA, dps and ahpC in the perR-inactivated mutant in the absence of H2O2 treatment (Fig 4B). Conversely, the increased expression of dps was not observed in the srrA-inactivated mutant untreated with H2O2 (Fig 3). These results suggest that the increased expression of dps in the srrA mutant is not directly related to PerR. PerR is a repressor for several anti-oxidant factors, and this repression was alleviated by H2O2 [49]. The increased expression of katA, dps and ahpC in the WT and the mutant treated with H2O2 (Fig 3) indicates that PerR is also involved in the expression of these factors. Compared with the WT, a higher level of katA and dps transcripts was observed in the srrA-inactivated mutant treated with H2O2 (Fig 3). These results indicate that SrrAB together with PerR is independently involved in katA and dps regulation. The increased expression of these genes might be an indirect effect of a change in the redox-potential in the srrA-inactivated mutant because the mutant showed a decreased expression of the genes responsible for cytochrome assembly and heme biosynthesis in the electron transport chain [35]. However, because the expression pattern of katA and dps in the mutant was different (Fig 3), further studies will be required to clarify the link between SrrAB and katA or dps. In addition, we demonstrated for the first time that Hmp was associated with H2O2 susceptibility in S. aureus. A relationship between Hmp and susceptibility to oxidative stress has been reported in E. coli and S. typhimurium [50, 44]. In the presence of NO, Hmp converts NO to nitrate (NO3-) by the reaction NO + O2 + e- → NO3- utilizing an electron from the reduction of flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) [51]. In the absence of NO, Hmp has the potential to generate superoxide anion radicals (O2-) by the reaction O2 + e- → O2- utilizing an electron from the reduction of FAD [52]. In addition, Hmp is associated with the production of ·OH from H2O2 via the Fenton chemistry in the absence of NO [44]. Based on these reports, it is thought that hmp inactivation in S. aureus suppresses the generation of intracellular oxidative stress, and the mutant showed lower susceptibility to H2O2 than the WT. NsrR, which is a Rrf2 family transcription repressor, was demonstrated to repress the generation of oxidative stress in the absence of NO by repressing the expression of hmp in several bacterial species, including E. coli, S. typhimurium and B. subtilis [53]. The inactivation of nsrR results in high susceptibility to H2O2 in S. typhimurium [45]. However, we could not find the gene nsrR or an nsrR homologue in the S. aureus genome database. TCS, SrrAB and/or ResDE have been reported to regulate Hmp in the presence of NO in S. aureus and Bacillus subtilis [34, 35, 54]. In B. subtilis, ResDE regulates Hmp expression in an NsrR-dependent manner [55], whereas in S. aureus, Hmp was dependent on SrrAB regulation. We suggest that the expression of hmp is regulated by SrrAB and affects the susceptibility to H2O2. In a co-culture assay, the percentage of the srrA-inactivated mutant was high in a mixed culture with S. sanguinis. Because several oral streptococci, such as S. sanguinis, S. parasanguinis, S. gordonii and S. oralis, can produce H2O2 [56-58], S. aureus requires H2O2 resistance to survive in the oral cavity. In the oral cavity, S. aureus can colonize under anaerobic (dental plaque and gingival sulcus) and aerobic conditions (oral mucosa) [8-10]. Therefore, S. aureus can modulate its susceptibility to H2O2 by SrrAB activity and coexist with H2O2-producing oral streptococci, including S. sanguinis. Further studies will be required to analyze the functions of SrrAB involved in the co-existence with H2O2-producing bacteria in vivo, particularly in the oral cavity.

Susceptibility of MW2 harbouring the empty pCL8 to H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis.

The susceptibilities of S. aureus MW2 and MW2 harbouring an empty pCL8 vector (MW2::pCL8) to H2O2 produced by S. sanguinis were determined by direct assay under aerobic conditions (5% CO2). (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Expression of cidA in srrA-inactivated mutant.

The expression of cidA in mid-log phase (cell density at 660 nm = 0.8) cells of S. aureus MW2 WT, srrA-inactivated mutant and the complemented strain grown in TSB was determined by quantitative PCR as described in the Materials and Methods section. The data are the mean ± SD of five biological independent experiments. Significant differences compared with WT were determined by Dunnett’s test (***, P < 0.001; N.S., not significant). (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Expression of perR in srrA-inactivated mutant.

The expression of perR in mid-log phase (cell density at 660 nm = 0.8) cells of S. aureus MW2 WT, srrA-inactivated mutant and the complemented strain grown in TSB was determined by quantitative PCR as described in the Materials and Methods section. The data are the mean ± SD of five biological independent experiments. Significant differences compared with WT were determined by Dunnett’s test (N.S., not significant). (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Bacterial growth of S. sanguinis and S. aureus strains on TSA plates.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  59 in total

Review 1.  Two-component and phosphorelay signal transduction.

Authors:  J A Hoch
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.934

2.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  H(2)O(2) produced by viridans group streptococci may contribute to inhibition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization of oral cavities in newborns.

Authors:  Y Uehara; K Kikuchi; T Nakamura; H Nakama; K Agematsu; Y Kawakami; N Maruchi; K Totsuka
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Inhibition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization of oral cavities in newborns by viridans group streptococci.

Authors:  Y Uehara; K Kikuchi; T Nakamura; H Nakama; K Agematsu; Y Kawakami; N Maruchi; K Totsuka
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 5.  What determines nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus?

Authors:  S J Peacock; I de Silva; F D Lowy
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 6.  The ecology of Staphylococcus species in the oral cavity.

Authors:  A J Smith; M S Jackson; J Bagg
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Nasal carriage as a source of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Study Group.

Authors:  C von Eiff; K Becker; K Machka; H Stammer; G Peters
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-01-04       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Influence of environmental conditions on hydrogen peroxide formation by Streptococcus gordonii.

Authors:  J P Barnard; M W Stinson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  PerR controls oxidative stress resistance and iron storage proteins and is required for virulence in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M J Horsburgh; M O Clements; H Crossley; E Ingham; S J Foster
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Catalase, superoxide dismutase, and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. In vitro and in vivo studies with emphasis on staphylococcal--leukocyte interaction.

Authors:  G L Mandell
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  7 in total

1.  Metabolic Cross-talk Between Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells and Internalized Staphylococcus aureus as a Driver for Infection.

Authors:  Laura M Palma Medina; Ann-Kristin Becker; Stephan Michalik; Harita Yedavally; Elisa J M Raineri; Petra Hildebrandt; Manuela Gesell Salazar; Kristin Surmann; Henrike Pförtner; Solomon A Mekonnen; Anna Salvati; Lars Kaderali; Jan Maarten van Dijl; Uwe Völker
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Influence of subinhibitory concentrations of NH125 on biofilm formation & virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Qingzhong Liu; Zhaojun Zheng; Wooseong Kim; Beth Burgwyn Fuchs; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.808

3.  Antibiofilm and staphyloxanthin inhibitory potential of terbinafine against Staphylococcus aureus: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Momen Askoura; Nehal Yousef; Basem Mansour; Fatma Al-Zahraa A Yehia
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.781

4.  The Staphylococcus aureus SrrAB Regulatory System Modulates Hydrogen Peroxide Resistance Factors, Which Imparts Protection to Aconitase during Aerobic Growth.

Authors:  Ameya A Mashruwala; Jeffrey M Boyd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Dialogue between Staphylococcus aureus SA15 and Lactococcus garvieae strains experiencing oxidative stress.

Authors:  Clothilde Queiroux; Muriel Bonnet; Taous Saraoui; Pierre Delpech; Philippe Veisseire; Etienne Rifa; Cécile Moussard; Geneviève Gagne; Céline Delbès; Stéphanie Bornes
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Celastrol mitigates staphyloxanthin biosynthesis and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus via targeting key regulators of virulence; in vitro and in vivo approach.

Authors:  Fatma Al-Zahraa A Yehia; Nehal Yousef; Momen Askoura
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.465

Review 7.  Reduced Susceptibility and Increased Resistance of Bacteria against Disinfectants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Urška Rozman; Marko Pušnik; Sergej Kmetec; Darja Duh; Sonja Šostar Turk
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-12-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.