| Literature DB >> 27441834 |
Ivana Rešetnik1, Dea Baričevič2, Diana Batîr Rusu3, Klaudija Carović-Stanko4, Paschalina Chatzopoulou5, Zora Dajić-Stevanović6, Maria Gonceariuc7, Martina Grdiša4, Danijela Greguraš1, Alban Ibraliu8, Marija Jug-Dujaković9, Elez Krasniqi10, Zlatko Liber1, Senad Murtić11, Dragana Pećanac12, Ivan Radosavljević1, Gjoshe Stefkov13, Danijela Stešević14, Ivan Šoštarić6, Zlatko Šatović4.
Abstract
Dalmatian sage (Salvia officinalis L., Lamiaceae) is a well-known aromatic and medicinal Mediterranean plant that is native in coastal regions of the western Balkan and southern Apennine Peninsulas and is commonly cultivated worldwide. It is widely used in the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries. Knowledge of its genetic diversity and spatiotemporal patterns is important for plant breeding programmes and conservation. We used eight microsatellite markers to investigate evolutionary history of indigenous populations as well as genetic diversity and structure within and among indigenous and cultivated/naturalised populations distributed across the Balkan Peninsula. The results showed a clear separation between the indigenous and cultivated/naturalised groups, with the cultivated material originating from one restricted geographical area. Most of the genetic diversity in both groups was attributable to differences among individuals within populations, although spatial genetic analysis of indigenous populations indicated the existence of isolation by distance. Geographical structuring of indigenous populations was found using clustering analysis, with three sub-clusters of indigenous populations. The highest level of gene diversity and the greatest number of private alleles were found in the central part of the eastern Adriatic coast, while decreases in gene diversity and number of private alleles were evident towards the northwestern Adriatic coast and southern and eastern regions of the Balkan Peninsula. The results of Ecological Niche Modelling during Last Glacial Maximum and Approximate Bayesian Computation suggested two plausible evolutionary trajectories: 1) the species survived in the glacial refugium in southern Adriatic coastal region with subsequent colonization events towards northern, eastern and southern Balkan Peninsula; 2) species survived in several refugia exhibiting concurrent divergence into three genetic groups. The insight into genetic diversity and structure also provide the baseline data for conservation of S. officinalis genetic resources valuable for future breeding programmes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27441834 PMCID: PMC4956250 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159545
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Within-population microsatellite diversity and genetic relationships of 30 Dalmatian sage populations.
Populations are numbered as for Table 1. (A) Distribution of sampled populations: circles indicate indigenous populations; triangles indicate cultivated/naturalised populations. Symbol colours correspond to allelic richness (N): white < 5, yellow 5–7, orange 7–9 and red >9. (B) Unrooted Fitch-Margoliash tree based on Cavalli-Sforza's chord distance. Bootstrap support values greater than 50% of 1,000 replicates are given near the branches.
Fig 2Genetic structure of 30 Dalmatian sage populations as estimated by the software STRUCTURE.
The population numbering corresponds to Table 1. (A) Population structure assuming K = 4. (B) Proportions of membership for K = 2 to 4 clusters are given. Each individual plant is represented by a single vertical line divided into colours. Each colour represents one cluster, and the length of the coloured segment shows the individual’s estimated proportion of membership in that cluster. White lines separate populations that are labelled below the figure.
Sampling sites, genetic diversity and genetic bottlenecks assessed from eight microsatellite markers in 30 Dalmatian sage populations.
| No. | Locality | Country | Latitude (N) | Longitude (E) | Status | M-ratio | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P01 | Petrinjski Kras, Soligrad | SVN | 23 | 45.57 | 13.91 | Indigenous | 8.750 | 7.930 | 0 | 0.745 | 0.795 | 0.806 | 0.063 | ns | 0.422 | 0.730 |
| P02 | Petrinje | SVN | 24 | 45.57 | 13.90 | Indigenous | 9.125 | 8.258 | 0 | 0.854 | 0.795 | 0.797 | -0.075 | ns | 0.273 | 0.785 |
| P03 | Krk | HRV | 25 | 45.23 | 14.57 | Indigenous | 8.500 | 7.708 | 0 | 0.717 | 0.734 | 0.748 | 0.024 | ns | 0.973 | 0.797 |
| P04 | Pag | HRV | 25 | 44.43 | 15.04 | Indigenous | 8.750 | 7.948 | 1 | 0.754 | 0.759 | 0.766 | 0.008 | ns | 0.875 | 0.745 |
| P05 | Pirovac | HRV | 24 | 43.83 | 15.72 | Indigenous | 8.000 | 7.107 | 0 | 0.707 | 0.708 | 0.709 | 0.002 | ns | 0.875 | |
| P06 | Šparadići | HRV | 24 | 43.63 | 15.96 | Indigenous | 9.875 | 9.071 | 1 | 0.698 | 0.743 | 0.757 | 0.060 | ns | 0.980 | 0.754 |
| P07 | Unešić | HRV | 25 | 43.73 | 16.16 | Indigenous | 10.000 | 8.990 | 1 | 0.736 | 0.771 | 0.787 | 0.045 | ns | 0.809 | 0.756 |
| P08 | Vis | HRV | 24 | 43.03 | 16.14 | Indigenous | 7.125 | 6.655 | 0 | 0.717 | 0.712 | 0.727 | -0.007 | ns | 0.809 | |
| P09 | Pelješac | HRV | 25 | 42.98 | 17.27 | Indigenous | 11.250 | 9.949 | 2 | 0.754 | 0.768 | 0.770 | 0.018 | ns | 0.770 | 0.820 |
| P10 | Konavle | HRV | 25 | 42.60 | 18.25 | Indigenous | 11.375 | 10.300 | 0 | 0.825 | 0.846 | 0.849 | 0.025 | ns | 0.473 | 0.847 |
| P11 | Hutovo blato | BiH | 24 | 43.04 | 17.71 | Indigenous | 8.000 | 7.372 | 2 | 0.817 | 0.758 | 0.764 | -0.078 | ns | 0.578 | |
| P12 | Mostar | BiH | 25 | 43.33 | 17.75 | Indigenous | 10.625 | 9.709 | 1 | 0.762 | 0.796 | 0.806 | 0.043 | ns | 0.963 | 0.866 |
| P13 | Međugorje | BiH | 25 | 43.18 | 17.69 | Indigenous | 10.500 | 9.471 | 1 | 0.818 | 0.815 | 0.819 | -0.004 | ns | 0.473 | 0.805 |
| P14 | Trebinje | BiH | 22 | 42.71 | 18.40 | Indigenous | 10.625 | 9.847 | 2 | 0.777 | 0.833 | 0.844 | 0.067 | ns | 0.320 | 0.766 |
| P15 | Pješivci, Nikšić | MNE | 24 | 42.36 | 19.23 | Indigenous | 7.375 | 6.721 | 0 | 0.693 | 0.745 | 0.759 | 0.070 | ns | 0.422 | 0.704 |
| P16 | Sutorman, Bar | MNE | 22 | 42.15 | 19.12 | Indigenous | 8.375 | 7.651 | 1 | 0.699 | 0.718 | 0.725 | 0.026 | ns | 0.973 | 0.800 |
| P17 | Llogora | ALB | 24 | 40.20 | 19.59 | Indigenous | 9.375 | 8.633 | 4 | 0.744 | 0.764 | 0.765 | 0.027 | ns | 0.994 | 0.681 |
| P18 | Mt. Rrenci | ALB | 23 | 41.83 | 19.58 | Indigenous | 9.625 | 8.694 | 0 | 0.743 | 0.802 | 0.813 | 0.073 | ns | 0.727 | 0.724 |
| P19 | Mt. Jablanica | MKD | 24 | 41.32 | 20.58 | Indigenous | 7.250 | 6.458 | 2 | 0.683 | 0.699 | 0.709 | 0.024 | ns | 0.680 | |
| P20 | Mt. Karaormar | MKD | 22 | 41.39 | 20.62 | Indigenous | 6.625 | 6.210 | 1 | 0.720 | 0.725 | 0.738 | 0.007 | ns | 0.273 | |
| P21 | Lygeri | GRC | 24 | 40.33 | 21.71 | Indigenous | 6.375 | 5.752 | 0 | 0.679 | 0.673 | 0.682 | -0.009 | ns | 0.527 | |
| P22 | Skiti | GRC | 22 | 40.32 | 21.65 | Indigenous | 7.000 | 6.600 | 1 | 0.672 | 0.702 | 0.710 | 0.042 | ns | 0.191 | 0.757 |
| P23 | Vermicë | KOS | 23 | 42.17 | 20.58 | Naturalised | 4.250 | 4.089 | 0 | 0.598 | 0.561 | 0.577 | -0.067 | ns | 0.578 | |
| P24 | Mirusha | KOS | 24 | 42.52 | 20.57 | Naturalised | 4.375 | 4.076 | 0 | 0.505 | 0.561 | 0.598 | 0.100 | ns | 0.527 | |
| P25 | Pančevo | SRB | 20 | 44.85 | 20.72 | Cultivated | 2.750 | 2.707 | 0 | 0.313 | 0.377 | 0.422 | 0.171 | ns | 0.527 | |
| P26 | Gradište | SRB | 24 | 43.33 | 22.17 | Indigenous | 5.500 | 5.134 | 0 | 0.537 | 0.608 | 0.646 | 0.118 | ns | 0.986 | 0.725 |
| P27 | Bacau, Motoc | ROM | 24 | 46.36 | 27.10 | Cultivated | 4.250 | 4.189 | 0 | 0.783 | 0.610 | 0.623 | -0.283 | *** | ||
| P28 | Bihor, Avram Iancu | ROM | 22 | 46.67 | 21.53 | Cultivated | 3.750 | 3.639 | 0 | 0.793 | 0.612 | 0.633 | -0.296 | *** | ||
| P29 | Chishinau | MDA | 23 | 47.36 | 28.85 | Naturalised | 4.125 | 3.886 | 0 | 0.592 | 0.595 | 0.610 | 0.004 | ns | 0.230 | |
| P30 | Lopatica, Cahul | MDA | 24 | 45.95 | 28.41 | Cultivated | 3.250 | 3.121 | 0 | 0.545 | 0.497 | 0.504 | -0.096 | ns | 0.125 | |
| Indigenous | 7.920 | 115 | 0.733 | 0.751 | 0.761 | 0.025 | ||||||||||
| Cultivated/Naturalised | 3.672 | 0 | 0.590 | 0.545 | 0.567 | -0.067 | ||||||||||
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.008 |
SVN—Slovenia, HRV—Croatia, BiH—Bosnia and Herzegovina, MNE—Montenegro, ALB—Albania, MKD—Macedonia, GRC—Greece, KOS—Kosovo, SRB—Serbia, ROM—Romania, MDA—Moldova; n—sample size; N—average number of alleles; N—allelic richness; N—total number of private alleles; H—observed heterozygosity; H—expected heterozygosity;; H—expected heterozygosity calculated on allele frequencies corrected for null-alleles; F—inbreeding coefficient (ns–non-significant value; * significant at P < 0.05; ** significant at P < 0.01; *** significant at P < 0.001); P—probability results of a Wilcoxon signed-ranks test used to assess population bottleneck (P-values lower than 0.05 are indicated in bold type-face); M-ratio—Garza—Williamson's M-ratio (values below the critical value, M < 0.68, are indicated in bold type-face); *P—the significance level of differences in the average values of N, H, H and F between groups (indigenous vs. cultivated/naturalised populations)
Analysis of molecular variance for the partitioning of microsatellite diversity.
| Analysis | Source of variation | df | Variance components | % Total variance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Among populations | 29 | 0.494 | 15.25 | 0.152 | < 0.0001 |
| Within populations | 1388 | 2.744 | 84.75 | |||
| B | Among groups | 1 | 0.419 | 11.94 | 0.119 | < 0.0001 |
| Among population within groups | 28 | 0.342 | 9.77 | 0.111 | < 0.0001 | |
| Within populations | 1388 | 2.744 | 78.29 | 0.217 | < 0.0001 | |
| C | Among populations | 22 | 0.355 | 10.80 | 0.108 | < 0.0001 |
| Within populations | 1075 | 2.931 | 89.20 | |||
| D | Among populations | 6 | 0.293 | 12.25 | 0.122 | < 0.0001 |
| Within populations | 313 | 2.101 | 87.75 |
(A) Among and within 30 Dalmatian sage populations, (B) between groups (indigenous vs. cultivated/naturalised), among populations within groups and within populations, (C) among and within 23 indigenous populations and (D) among and within seven cultivated/naturalised populations. P(ϕ) - ϕ-statistics probability level after 10,000 permutations.
Fig 3Isolation by distance analysis among 23 indigenous Dalmatian sage populations.
Fig 4Ecological Niche Modelling of Salvia officinalis under (a) present, (b) Last Glacial Maximum CCSM conditions and (c) Last Glacial Maximum MIROC conditions.
The colour codes indicate habitat suitability, from light blue (low suitability) to dark blue (high suitability) as calculated by the model.