Literature DB >> 27441180

Clinical values of control over pain and pain coping strategies in surgical treatment for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Daisuke Higuchi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Control over pain and pain coping strategies are associated with pain intensity as well as psychological status and subjective disability in patients experiencing pain. The present study assessed the clinical values of control over pain and pain coping strategies in surgical treatment for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis using mediation analysis.
METHODS: Sixty-two patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (median age, 70 years; 34 men, 28 women) were evaluated before surgery. The pain intensity and area, psychological status/subjective disability (Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire), and control over pain/pain coping strategies (Coping Strategies Questionnaire) were assessed. Mediation analysis, which consisted of serial regression analyses, mainly tested whether (1) control over pain/pain coping strategies were predicted by pain characteristics and (2) control over pain/pain coping strategies predicted psychological status/subjective disability after controlling for pain characteristics.
RESULTS: Control over pain was predicted by pain intensity (regression coefficient, -0.33; p = 0.01); moreover, it predicted walking ability (standardized partial regression coefficient, 0.31; p = 0.01) and social function (0.38; p = 0.00) after controlling for pain intensity. Although increasing activity level, one pain coping strategy, was predicted by pain intensity (regression coefficient, -0.30; p = 0.02), it did not predict walking ability (standardized partial regression coefficient, 0.07; p = 0.53) or social function (0.13; p = 0.33) when considering pain intensity.
CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, mediation analysis demonstrated that pain intensity did not directly affect perceived walking ability or social function, but did affect control over pain; moreover, control over pain affected walking ability and social function. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings are useful for a deep understanding of the relationships between pain and subjective disability in preoperative patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. More attention should be given to patients' thoughts about pain such as control over pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  control over pain; lumbar spinal stenosis; mediation; pain coping strategies

Year:  2016        PMID: 27441180      PMCID: PMC4943172          DOI: 10.14444/3022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  21 in total

1.  The roles of beliefs, catastrophizing, and coping in the functioning of patients with temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  J A Turner; S F Dworkin; L Mancl; K H Huggins; E L Truelove
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)/JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ). The report on the development of revised versions. April 16, 2007. The Subcommittee of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation.

Authors:  Mitsuru Fukui; Kazuhiro Chiba; Mamoru Kawakami; Shinichi Kikuchi; Shinichi Konno; Masabumi Miyamoto; Atsushi Seichi; Tadashi Shimamura; Osamu Shirado; Toshihiko Taguchi; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Katsushi Takeshita; Toshikazu Tani; Yoshiaki Toyama; Kazuo Yonenobu; Eiji Wada; Takashi Tanaka; Yoshio Hirota
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.601

3.  The significance of pain catastrophizing in clinical manifestations of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: mediation analysis with bootstrapping.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Chan-Hee Cho; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Psychosocial factors associated with pain intensity, pain-related interference, and psychological functioning in persons with multiple sclerosis and pain.

Authors:  Travis L Osborne; Mark P Jensen; Dawn M Ehde; Marisol A Hanley; George Kraft
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Quantified pain drawing in subacute low back pain. Validation in a nonselected outpatient industrial sample.

Authors:  C Ohlund; C Eek; S Palmbald; B Areskoug; A Nachemson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Correlation of low back pain caused by lumbar spinal stenosis and depression in women: a clinical study.

Authors:  Hulagu Kaptan; Esra Süer Yalçın; Omür Kasımcan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Clinical factors of importance for outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Katarina Silverplats; B Lind; B Zoëga; K Halldin; L Rutberg; M Gellerstedt; H Brisby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The impact of psychological factors on outcomes for spinal cord stimulation: an analysis with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Tilman Wolter; Ingrid Fauler; Kristin Kieselbach
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment.

Authors:  Anne K Rosenstiel; Francis J Keefe
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability : The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

Authors:  Mitsuru Fukui; Kazuhiro Chiba; Mamoru Kawakami; Shinichi Kikuchi; Shinichi Konno; Masabumi Miyamoto; Atsushi Seichi; Tadashi Shimamura; Osamu Shirado; Toshihiko Taguchi; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Katsushi Takeshita; Toshikazu Tani; Yoshiaki Toyama; Kazuo Yonenobu; Eiji Wada; Takashi Tanaka; Yoshio Hirota
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 1.601

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.