Literature DB >> 8724085

Quantified pain drawing in subacute low back pain. Validation in a nonselected outpatient industrial sample.

C Ohlund1, C Eek, S Palmbald, B Areskoug, A Nachemson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The criterion and construct validities of pain drawing, quantified by a simple total body area score of pain extent (area raw extent assessment score), were analyzed prospectively on consecutive patients (n = 103), drawn from a predefined blue collar worker population, all sick listed for 6 weeks as a result of low back pain.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity of pain drawing as a screening tool in the secondary prevention of subacute low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pain drawings have been used clinically for more than 40 years as a complement to a patient's verbal pain descriptions. The main objectives have been to differentiate functional pain from organic pain and to identify meaningful features in spatial-anatomic pain distribution. The ability of the pain drawing to delineate concurrent psychopathology correctly has been questioned. There is no consensus on which scoring method should be used.
METHODS: The area raw extent assessment score was analyzed concurrently against the penalty point system and predictively against return to work and absenteeism over a period of 2 years. Content and construct validity assessed the relative influence of medical, psychologic, and subjective disability as well as psychosocial factors.
RESULTS: Criterion validation of the area raw extent assessment score showed significant correlations, both concurrently against the penalty point score (r = 0.86, P < 0.001, with explained variance R2 = 0.75, P < 0.001) and predictively against occupational handicap (r = 0.48, P < 0.001). In construct validation, the highest explained variance was shown for medical (R2 = 0.46, P < 0.001) and psychologic factors (R2 = 0.46, P < 0.001) and psychologic factors (R2 = 0.34, P < 0.001) and for subjective disability (R2 = 0.32, P < 0.001). Variance in the area raw extent assessment score also was explained by psychosocial factors (R2 = 0.19, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Pain drawing quantification of the extent of pain shows high criterion and construct validity for the area raw extent assessment score. Content validity could be shown for significant clinical aspects of the disability experience--assets preferred for a screening tool in secondary prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8724085     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199605010-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  25 in total

1.  Pain patterns and descriptions in patients with radicular pain: does the pain necessarily follow a specific dermatome?

Authors:  Donald R Murphy; Eric L Hurwitz; Jonathan K Gerrard; Ronald Clary
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2009-09-21

2.  Prevalence of shoulder pain in the community: the influence of case definition.

Authors:  D P Pope; P R Croft; C M Pritchard; A J Silman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 3.  Prediction of sickness absence in patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wietske Kuijer; Johan W Groothoff; Sandra Brouwer; Jan H B Geertzen; Pieter U Dijkstra
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-09

4.  Colored Pain Drawing as a Clinical Tool in Differentiating Neuropathic Pain from Non-Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Nalini Sehgal; Debra B Gordon; Scott Hetzel; Miroslav Misha Backonja
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Effects of psychosocial and individual psychological factors on the onset of musculoskeletal pain: common and site-specific effects.

Authors:  E S Nahit; I M Hunt; M Lunt; G Dunn; A J Silman; G J Macfarlane
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Are MRI high-signal changes of alar and transverse ligaments in acute whiplash injury related to outcome?

Authors:  Nils Vetti; Jostein Kråkenes; Geir E Eide; Jarle Rørvik; Nils E Gilhus; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Clinical values of control over pain and pain coping strategies in surgical treatment for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Daisuke Higuchi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-05-20

8.  A prospective, masked 18-month minimum follow-up on neurophysiologic changes in persons with spinal stenosis, low back pain, and no symptoms.

Authors:  Andrew J Haig; Karen S J Yamakawa; Christopher Parres; Anthony Chiodo; Henry Tong
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Pain 5 years after instrumented and non-instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Finn B Christensen; Ebbe S Hansen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Computerized assessment of pain drawing area: A pilot study.

Authors:  Anna Wenngren; Britt-Marie Stålnacke
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.