Literature DB >> 25239153

The significance of pain catastrophizing in clinical manifestations of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: mediation analysis with bootstrapping.

Ho-Joong Kim1, Chan-Hee Cho1, Kyoung-Tak Kang2, Bong-Soon Chang3, Choon-Ki Lee3, Jin S Yeom4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Pain intensity in various chronic pain disorders has been associated with catastrophizing. Considering the pathomechanism and clinical symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), pain catastrophizing could be associated with pain intensity and disability in patients with LSS.
PURPOSE: Firstly, to determine whether catastrophizing is associated with an increased intensity of pain and disability, and secondly, to determine whether it is linked to the relationship of gender to pain and disability in patients with degenerative LSS by using mediation analyses with bootstrapping. STUDY
DESIGN: Medical records review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with degenerative LSS were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: They included visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain, VAS for leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and pain catastrophizing scale (PCS).
METHODS: Ninety-five patients who were diagnosed with degenerative LSS were included in this study. Detailed demographic data including age, sex, and body mass index and series of questionnaires were collected, including PCS, ODI, and VAS for back and leg pain. Radiologic analysis including the grade of canal stenosis and disc/facet joint degeneration was performed using magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography findings. After adjustment of covariates, multivariate regression analysis was used to assess each component of the proposed mediation models among VAS for back/leg pain, ODI, gender, and PCS. Mediation was also assessed by the bootstrapping technique.
RESULTS: Pain catastrophizing demonstrated a significant positive association with pain intensity and disability represented by VAS for back and leg pain and ODI scores. The mediation analysis confirmed the mediating role of VAS for back pain in the relationship between PCS and ODI. Furthermore, multivariate regression analysis with bootstrapping demonstrated that the PCS significantly mediated the gender differences in VAS for back pain and ODI.
CONCLUSIONS: Pain catastrophizing was a mediator of gender differences for back pain and disability in patients with LSS. In addition, pain catastrophizing was associated with disability in LSS, which was partially mediated by increased back pain intensity.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bootstrapping; Gender difference; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Oswestry disability index; Pain catastrophizing; Pain catastrophizing scale

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25239153     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  11 in total

1.  Biopsychosocial factors predict quality of life in thoracolumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Dean A Tripp; Edward Abraham; Maude Lambert; Kate Wagg; Erin Bigney; Eden Daly; Phylicia Verreault; Neil Manson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Increased and decreased pelvic incidence, sagittal facet joint orientations are associated with lumbar spine osteoarthritis in a large cadaveric collection.

Authors:  Douglas S Weinberg; Raymond W Liu; Katherine K Xie; William Z Morris; Jeremy J Gebhart; Zachary L Gordon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Influence of catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression on in-hospital opioid consumption, pain, and quality of recovery after adult spine surgery.

Authors:  Lauren K Dunn; Marcel E Durieux; Lucas G Fernández; Siny Tsang; Emily E Smith-Straesser; Hasan F Jhaveri; Shauna P Spanos; Matthew R Thames; Christopher D Spencer; Aaron Lloyd; Russell Stuart; Fan Ye; Jacob P Bray; Edward C Nemergut; Bhiken I Naik
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2017-11-10

4.  Pain Sensitivity and Pain Catastrophizing Are Associated With Persistent Pain and Disability After Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Steven Z George; Clinton J Devin; Stephen T Wegener; Kristin R Archer
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Gender differences in patients scheduled for lumbar disc herniation surgery: a National Register Study including 15,631 operations.

Authors:  Fredrik Strömqvist; Björn Strömqvist; Bo Jönsson; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Clinical values of control over pain and pain coping strategies in surgical treatment for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Daisuke Higuchi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-05-20

7.  Women Do Not Have Poorer Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Winston Shang Rong Lim; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Graham S. Goh; William Yeo; Zhixing Marcus Ling; Wai-Mun Yue; Chang Ming Guo; Seang Beng Tan
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-12

8.  Gender differences in the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation in elderly.

Authors:  Fredrik Strömqvist; Björn Strömqvist; Bo Jönsson; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Associated With Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery?

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Annette B Jespersen; Christian C Støttrup; Karen H Hansen; Mikkel O Andersen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-05-01

10.  Relationship between sarcopenia and pain catastrophizing in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Takashi Wada; Shinji Tanishima; Mari Osaki; Hideki Nagashima; Hiroshi Hagino
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2019-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.