Literature DB >> 20512513

Clinical factors of importance for outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery: long-term follow-up.

Katarina Silverplats1, B Lind, B Zoëga, K Halldin, L Rutberg, M Gellerstedt, H Brisby.   

Abstract

Factors as age, sex, smoking, duration of leg pain, working status, type/level of disc herniation and psychosocial factors have been demonstrated to be of importance for short-term results after lumbar discectomy. There are few studies with long-term follow-up. In this prospective study of lumbar disc herniation patients undergoing surgery, the result was evaluated at 2 and 5-10 (mean 7.3) years after surgery. Predictive factors for satisfaction with treatment and objective outcome were investigated. Out of the included 171 patients undergoing lumbar discectomy, 154 (90%) patients completed the 2-year follow-up and 140 (81%) completed the long-term follow-up. Baseline data and questionnaires about leg- and back pain intensity (VAS), duration of leg pain, disability (Oswestry Disability Index), depression (Zung Depression Scale), sick leave and employment status were obtained preoperatively, at 2-year- and long-term follow-up. Primary outcome included patient satisfaction with treatment (at both time points) and assessment of an independent observer at the 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes at 2-year follow-up were improvement of leg and back pain, working capacity and the need for analgesics or sleeping pills. In about 70% of the patients excellent or good overall result was reported at both follow-ups, with subjective outcome measurements. The objective evaluation after 2 years was in agreement with this result. Time on sick leave was found to be a clinically important predictor of the primary outcomes, with a potential of changing the probability of a satisfactory outcome (both objective and subjective) from around 50% (sick leave >3 months) to 80% (sick leave <2 months). Time on sick leave was also an important predictor for several of the secondary outcomes; e.g. working capacity and the need for analgesics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20512513      PMCID: PMC2989281          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1433-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

1.  Preoperative predictors for the return to work of herniated disc patients.

Authors:  K Kitze; D Winkler; L Günther; M C Angermeyer
Journal:  Zentralbl Neurochir       Date:  2008-02

2.  Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar spine surgery. A prospective clinical study with 2 years' follow up.

Authors:  A Junge; M Fröhlich; S Ahrens; M Hasenbring; A Sandler; D Grob; J Dvorák
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Chapter 14. Pain and disability in degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  I Macnab
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1973

4.  Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation.

Authors:  H Weber
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; J Couper; J B Davies; J P O'Brien
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.358

6.  Prognosis of multifactorial outcome in lumbar discectomy: a prospective longitudinal study investigating patients with disc prolapse.

Authors:  Gabriele Kohlboeck; Karoline Verena Greimel; Wolfgang Peter Piotrowski; Max Leibetseder; Martin Krombholz-Reindl; Reinhold Neuhofer; Alois Schmid; Regine Klinger
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level.

Authors:  Christopher B Dewing; Matthew T Provencher; Robert H Riffenburgh; Stewart Kerr; Richard E Manos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Authors:  M Hurme; H Alaranta
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Duration of symptoms as a predictor of outcome after lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  O P Nygaard; B Romner; J H Trumpy
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Influence of gender and other prognostic factors on outcome of sciatica.

Authors:  Wilco C Peul; Ronald Brand; Ralph T W M Thomeer; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  41 in total

1.  Driving reaction time before and after surgery for lumbar disc herniation in patients with radiculopathy.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Ricarda Lechner; Bernhard Foedinger; Christian Haid; Pujan Kavakebi; Klaus Galiano; Alois Obwegeser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cohort study of lumbar percutaneous chemonucleolysis using ethanol gel in sciatica refractory to conservative treatment.

Authors:  Sébastien Touraine; Joël Damiano; Olivia Tran; Jean-Denis Laredo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2010.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2010.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Predictors of clinical outcome following lumbar disc surgery: the value of historical, physical examination, and muscle function variables.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Hebert; Julie M Fritz; Shane L Koppenhaver; Anne Thackeray; Per Kjaer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Recovery of muscle strength after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Greger Lønne; Tore K Solberg; Kristin Sjaavik; Øystein P Nygaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Lumbar disc herniation treated by microendoscopic discectomy : Prognostic predictors of long-term postoperative outcome.

Authors:  Xin Hong; Rui Shi; Yun-Tao Wang; Lei Liu; Jun-Ping Bao; Xiao-Tao Wu
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  Incidence of Low Back Pain After Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Disc and Its Effect on Patient-reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Stephen K Mendenhall; Saniya S Godil; Priya Sivasubramanian; Kevin Cahill; John Ziewacz; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Clinical values of control over pain and pain coping strategies in surgical treatment for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Daisuke Higuchi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-05-20

Review 10.  The association between pain scores and disc height change following discectomy surgery in lumbar disc herniation patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaolong Chen; Harvinder S Sandhu; Jose Vargas Castillo; Ashish D Diwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.