| Literature DB >> 27438841 |
Yage Xing1, Qinglian Xu2, Simon X Yang3, Cunkun Chen4, Yong Tang5, Shumin Sun6, Liang Zhang7, Zhenming Che8, Xihong Li9.
Abstract
The chitosan-based coating with antimicrobial agent has been developed recently to control the decay of fruits. However, its fresh keeping and antimicrobial mechanism is still not very clear. The preservation mechanism of chitosan coating with cinnamon oil for fruits storage is investigated in this paper. Results in the atomic force microscopy sensor images show that many micropores exist in the chitosan coating film. The roughness of coating film is affected by the concentration of chitosan. The antifungal activity of cinnamon oil should be mainly due to its main consistent trans-cinnamaldehyde, which is proportional to the trans-cinnamaldehyde concentration and improves with increasing the attachment time of oil. The exosmosis ratios of Penicillium citrinum and Aspergillus flavus could be enhanced by increasing the concentration of cinnamon oil. Morphological observation indicates that, compared to the normal cell, the wizened mycelium of A. flavus is observed around the inhibition zone, and the growth of spores is also inhibited. Moreover, the analysis of gas sensors indicate that the chitosan-oil coating could decrease the level of O₂ and increase the level of CO₂ in the package of cherry fruits, which also control the fruit decay. These results indicate that its preservation mechanism might be partly due to the micropores structure of coating film as a barrier for gas and a carrier for oil, and partly due to the activity of cinnamon oil on the cell disruption.Entities:
Keywords: chitosan coating; cinnamon oil; preservation mechanism; sensor data
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27438841 PMCID: PMC4970155 DOI: 10.3390/s16071111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Morphological observation of chitosan coating (1.0%) by SEM: (a) 1000×; and (b) 5000×.
Figure 2AFM analysis images for the morphology of chitosan coating (15 μm × 15 μm): (A) film with chitosan at 0.25%; (B) film with chitosan at 0.50%; and (C) film with chitosan at 1.0%, (a) AFM plane profile of chitosan film and (b) AFM three-dimensional profile of chitosan film.
The arithmetic average roughness (Ra) and the root mean square roughness (Rq) of chitosan coating films analyzed by AFM. CC: Chitosan Concentration; MPCF: Micropore profile in chitosan film; IICF: Image information of chitosan film; CCFT: chitosan coating film thickness; Mean data with different letters (a–d) differ significantly at p < 0.05.
| CC | Samples | CCFT (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.25% | MPCF | 0.244 ab ± 0.042 | 0.289 b ± 0.034 | 0.056 a ± 0.004 |
| IICF | 0.131a ± 0.018 | 0.159 a ± 0.019 | ||
| 0.50% | MPCF | 0.295 b ± 0.051 | 0.334 b ± 0.050 | 0.061 a ± 0.004 |
| IICF | 0.181ab ± 0.029 | 0.228 ab ± 0.029 | ||
| 1.0% | MPCF | 0.399 c ± 0.093 | 0.449 c ± 0.106 | 0.068 b ± 0.006 |
| IICF | 0.247 ab ± 0.050 | 0.303 b ± 0.017 |
Figure 3The sample images for the roughness of chitosan coating films analyzed by AFM: (a) AFM profile information of chitosan at 1.0%; and (b) AFM image information of chitosan at 1.0%.
The relative contents of chemical consistent in cinnamon oil analyzed by GC-MS.
| Compounds | Retention Time (min) | Relative Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Cinnamaldehyde | 6.489 | 1.37 |
| Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3-phenylpropyl ester | 6.700 | 0.47 |
| Benzenepropanol, a-methyl- | 7.051 | 11.43 |
| trans-Cinnamaldehyde | 7.322 | 85.64 |
| Cyclobutanone | 8.767 | 0.02 |
| 1-Hexadecyl-2,3-dihydro-1 | 8.833 | 0.03 |
| 1-Chloropropane | 8.992 | 0.02 |
| Aziridine, 1-methyl- | 9.025 | 0.01 |
| 2-Penten-1-ol,5-[(1 | 9.258 | 0.24 |
| zingiberene | 9.477 | 0.05 |
| 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid dimethyl ester | 10.052 | 0.18 |
| Propargyl propionate | 11.849 | 0.01 |
| Methyl pentanoate | 22.292 | 0.04 |
| 1-(Aminooxy)-2-propene | 22.892 | 0.03 |
| Arachidic Acid Ethyl Ester | 24.333 | 0.12 |
| 2-Cyclohexylethanol | 29.375 | 0.05 |
| 9-Octadecenoic acid(9 | 29.582 | 0.29 |
Figure 4The total ion current for GC-MS analysis on the components of cinnamon oil.
Figure 5The antimicrobial activity of trans-cinnamaldehydes and cinnamon oil against: P. citrinum (a); and A. flavus (b). □: trans-cinnamaldehydes; ■: cinnamon oil; mean bars with different letters (a–d) differ significantly at p < 0.05.
Figure 6Antifungal activity of different attachment time of cinnamon oil with different concentrations against: P. citrinum (a); and A. flavus (b). Mean bars with different letters (a–d) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 for the different concentration of cinnamon oil at the same attachment time. Mean bars with different letters (p–t) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 for the different attachment time at the same concentration of cinnamon oil.
Figure 7Effect of the concentration of cinnamon oil on the exosmosis ratio of: P. citrinum (a); and A. flavus (b). Mean bars with different letters (a–d) differ significantly at p < 0.05.
Figure 8SEM images of normal cells ((a) 500×; and (b) 5000×)) and cells on the edge of inhibition zone ((c) 500×; and (d) 5000×) of A. flavus.
Figure 9Effect of coating treatments on: the concentrations of O2 and CO2 in the packages (a); fruit decay (b); and PPO (Polyphenylene Oxide) activity of fruits (c). □: Control; △: Chitosan coating; ◇: 0.25% Cinnamon oil; ○: Chitosan coating containing cinnamon oil; CC: Chitosan Coating; CO: Cinnamon Oil, CCCO: Chitosan Coating containing Cinnamon oil. Mean bars with different letters (a–e) differ significantly among different storage days for the same treatment at p < 0.05. Mean bars with different letters (p–r) differ significantly among different treatments for the same storage days at p < 0.05.