J Palma-Guerrero1, H-B Jansson, J Salinas, L V Lopez-Llorca. 1. Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Multidisciplinary Institute for Environmental Studies (MIES) Ramón Margalef, Department of Marine Sciences and Applied Biology, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Abstract
AIMS: To investigate the toxic effect of chitosan on important root pathogenic and biocontrol fungi (nematophagous, entomopathogenic and mycoparasitic). METHODS AND RESULTS: We have used standard bioassays to investigate the effect of chitosan on colony growth and developed bioassays to test spore germination. The results showed that the root pathogenic and mycoparasitic fungi tested were more sensitive to chitosan than nematophagous and entomopathogenic fungi. Chitosanases (and perhaps related enzymes) are involved in the resistance to chitosan. Two fungi, one sensitive to chitosan, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici, and one less sensitive, Pochonia chlamydosporia, were selected for ultrastructural investigations. Transmission electron microscopy revealed differences in the ultrastructural alterations caused by chitosan in the spores of the plant pathogenic fungus and in those of the nematophagous fungus. Confocal laser microscopy showed that Rhodamine-labelled chitosan enters rapidly into conidia of both fungi, in an energy-dependent process. CONCLUSIONS: Nematophagous and entomopathogenic fungi are rather resistant to the toxic effect of chitosan. Resistance of nematophagous and entomopathogenic fungi to chitosan could be associated with their high extracellular chitosanolytic activity. Furthermore, ultrastructural damage is much more severe in the chitosan sensitive fungus. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results of this paper suggest that biocontrol fungi tested could be combined with chitosan for biological control of plant pathogens and pests.
AIMS: To investigate the toxic effect of chitosan on important root pathogenic and biocontrol fungi (nematophagous, entomopathogenic and mycoparasitic). METHODS AND RESULTS: We have used standard bioassays to investigate the effect of chitosan on colony growth and developed bioassays to test spore germination. The results showed that the root pathogenic and mycoparasitic fungi tested were more sensitive to chitosan than nematophagous and entomopathogenic fungi. Chitosanases (and perhaps related enzymes) are involved in the resistance to chitosan. Two fungi, one sensitive to chitosan, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici, and one less sensitive, Pochonia chlamydosporia, were selected for ultrastructural investigations. Transmission electron microscopy revealed differences in the ultrastructural alterations caused by chitosan in the spores of the plant pathogenic fungus and in those of the nematophagous fungus. Confocal laser microscopy showed that Rhodamine-labelled chitosan enters rapidly into conidia of both fungi, in an energy-dependent process. CONCLUSIONS: Nematophagous and entomopathogenic fungi are rather resistant to the toxic effect of chitosan. Resistance of nematophagous and entomopathogenic fungi to chitosan could be associated with their high extracellular chitosanolytic activity. Furthermore, ultrastructural damage is much more severe in the chitosan sensitive fungus. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results of this paper suggest that biocontrol fungi tested could be combined with chitosan for biological control of plant pathogens and pests.
Authors: Federico Lopez-Moya; David Kowbel; Maria José Nueda; Javier Palma-Guerrero; N Louise Glass; Luis Vicente Lopez-Llorca Journal: Mol Biosyst Date: 2016-02
Authors: Jeannine M Refos; Alieke G Vonk; Marian T Ten Kate; Henri A Verbrugh; Irma A J M Bakker-Woudenberg; Wendy W J van de Sande Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Rebeca Cobos; Rosa María Mateos; José Manuel Álvarez-Pérez; Miguel Angel Olego; Silvia Sevillano; Sandra González-García; Enrique Garzón-Jimeno; Juan José R Coque Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Maria D L A Jaime; Luis Vicente Lopez-Llorca; Ana Conesa; Anna Y Lee; Michael Proctor; Lawrence E Heisler; Marinella Gebbia; Guri Giaever; J Timothy Westwood; Corey Nislow Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Md Hafizur Rahman; Latifur Rahman Shovan; Linda Gordon Hjeljord; Berit Bjugan Aam; Vincent G H Eijsink; Morten Sørlie; Arne Tronsmo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-25 Impact factor: 3.240