| Literature DB >> 22163886 |
Dionysis D Bochtis1, Claus G Sørensen, Ole Green, Thomas Bartzanas.
Abstract
Losses during storage of biomass are the main parameter that defines the profitability of using preserved biomass as feed for animal husbandry. In order to minimize storage losses, potential changes in specific physicochemical properties must be identified to subsequently act as indicators of silage decomposition and form the basis for preventive measures. This study presents a framework for a diagnostic system capable of detecting potential changes in specific physicochemical properties, i.e., temperature and the oxygen content, during the biomass storage process. The diagnostic system comprises a monitoring tool based on a wireless sensors network and a prediction tool based on a validated computation fluid dynamics model. It is shown that the system can provide the manager (end-user) with continuously updated information about specific biomass quality parameters. The system encompasses graphical visualization of the information to the end-user as a first step and, as a second step, the system identifies alerts depicting real differences between actual and predicted values of the monitored properties. The perspective is that this diagnostic system will provide managers with a solid basis for necessary preventive measures.Entities:
Keywords: biomass; computational fluid dynamics; decision support system
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22163886 PMCID: PMC3231403 DOI: 10.3390/s110504990
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.The basic physical components of the diagnostic system.
Figure 2.The sensor unit for temperature and oxygen consecration measurements within the protective housing.
Figure 3.The correlation between measured (sensors network) and predicted (CFD model) values of the mean air temperature (a) and oxygen concentration (b).
Figure 4.The sensor network within the prepared storage stack.
Figure 5.The configuration of the sensors network within the storage stack.
Figure 6.The predicted temporal distribution of the air temperature (at the stack center) by the CFD model (left) and the actual distribution according to the sensor data.
Figure 7.The predicted temporal distribution of the oxygen concentration (at the stack center) by the CFD model (left) and the actual according to the sensor data.
Figure 8.The course of the actual and predicted (with the maximum error incorporated) values of the oxygen concentration (a) and temperature (b), and the deviations from the maximum error ranges (c).