Literature DB >> 10073897

Informed consent to serum screening for Down syndrome: are women given adequate information?

J Gekas1, J Gondry, S Mazur, P Cesbron, F Thepot.   

Abstract

To assess the information given to women during a maternal serum screening (MSS) programme, we prospectively applied a questionnaire to 504 pregnant women attending for amniocentesis after a screen-positive result. The survey based on 200 usable questionnaires (39.7 per cent of our study population) showed that MSS was imposed as mandatory by 41.5 per cent of providers and done without their patients' agreement by 16 per cent. After release of the test results, 6.5 per cent of women believed that they were carrying a Down syndrome-affected fetus and 21.5 per cent thought the risk was about 50-50. A total of 38.5 per cent of the pregnant women were not informed of the risk of miscarriage after amniocentesis and 67.5 per cent believed that there was no possibility of a false-negative result with MSS. Information given over the telephone was particularly poorly understood compared with information provided during an outcome visit, since women who learned of their test result during such a visit scored significantly higher (69 per cent) when questioned about the risk of carrying a Down syndrome-affected fetus, compared with women informed of their test results by telephone (38.7 per cent) or by letter (47 per cent). We therefore suggest routine consultation with an antenatal care professional before testing to enable pregnant women to give their informed consent to MSS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10073897     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199901)19:1<1::aid-pd456>3.0.co;2-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  10 in total

1.  Informed choice of pregnant women in prenatal screening tests for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  H-H Chiang; Y-M Yu Chao; Y-S Yuh
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Why do pregnant women accept or decline prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome?

Authors:  Ellen Ternby; Ove Axelsson; Göran Annerén; Peter Lindgren; Charlotta Ingvoldstad
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-07-20

3.  To Use or Not to Use: The Prenatal Genetic Technology/Worry Conundrum.

Authors:  R Kenen; A C Smith; C Watkins; C Zuber-Pittore
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Assessment of the Effectiveness of Genetic Counseling by Telephone Compared to a Clinic Visit.

Authors:  Karan K Sangha; Anita Dircks; Sylvie Langlois
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Going the distance: the influence of practice location on the Ontario Maternal Serum Screening Program.

Authors:  J A Permaul-Woods; J C Carroll; A J Reid; C A Woodward; G Ryan; S Domb; S Arbitman; B Fallis; J Kilthei
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-08-24       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Women's experience of maternal serum screening.

Authors:  J C Carroll; J B Brown; A J Reid; P Pugh
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions.

Authors:  Cath Jackson; Francine M Cheater; Innes Reid
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Does labeling prenatal screening test results as negative or positive affect a woman's responses?

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin; Kristie Keeton; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Comparison of different strategies in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: cost effectiveness analysis of computer simulation.

Authors:  Jean Gekas; Geneviève Gagné; Emmanuel Bujold; Daniel Douillard; Jean-Claude Forest; Daniel Reinharz; François Rousseau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-02-13

10.  Exploring general practitioners' experience of informing women about prenatal screening tests for foetal abnormalities: a qualitative focus group study.

Authors:  Cate Nagle; Sharon Lewis; Bettina Meiser; Jane Gunn; Jane Halliday; Robin Bell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.