Literature DB >> 25582972

Information and knowledge about Down syndrome among women and partners after first trimester combined testing.

Ellen Ternby1, Charlotta Ingvoldstad, Göran Annerén, Peter Lindgren, Ove Axelsson.   

Abstract

We assessed reasons among women and partners for choosing combined ultrasound-biochemistry testing, information and knowledge about Down syndrome and decisions concerning invasive procedures and termination of pregnancy in a prospective cohort study in Uppsala County. In all 105 pregnant women and 104 partners coming for a combined ultrasound-biochemistry test answered a questionnaire. The most common reason for a combined ultrasound-biochemistry test was "to perform all tests possible to make sure the baby is healthy". Internet and midwives were the most common sources of information. Seventy-two percent had not received information on what it means to live with a child with Down syndrome. Many expectant parents perceived information as insufficient. Both women and partners had varying or low levels of knowledge about medical, cognitive and social consequences of Down syndrome. Twenty-five percent had not decided on an invasive test if indicated and only 42% would consider termination of pregnancy with a Down syndrome diagnosis.
© 2014 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Down syndrome; Prenatal screening; antenatal care and diagnosis; combined ultrasound and biochemistry test; education; informed decision

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25582972     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  7 in total

1.  Why do pregnant women accept or decline prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome?

Authors:  Ellen Ternby; Ove Axelsson; Göran Annerén; Peter Lindgren; Charlotta Ingvoldstad
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-07-20

2.  Prenatal tests for chromosomal abnormalities detection (PTCAD): pregnant women's knowledge in an Italian Population.

Authors:  Paola Quaresima; Federica Visconti; Elena Greco; Roberta Venturella; Costantino Di Carlo
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) and Preferences for Risk Information among High School Students in Sweden.

Authors:  Susanne Georgsson; Ellika Sahlin; Moa Iwarsson; Magnus Nordenskjöld; Peter Gustavsson; Erik Iwarsson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Decision-making factors in prenatal testing: A systematic review.

Authors:  Valentina Di Mattei; Federica Ferrari; Gaia Perego; Valentina Tobia; Fabio Mauro; Massimo Candiani
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2021-01-13

5.  Prenatal Ultrasound Screening and Women's Expectations: an Original Study.

Authors:  Anna Glynou; Dionysios Galatis; Kalliopi Christakakou-Fotiadi; Vassilis Yalelis; Ioannis E Varvarigos; Kondylios Antonios; Sarella Angeliki; Eleftheriades Makarios; Chasalevri Eirini; Koukaki Maria; Salakos Nicolaos
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2022-06

6.  What Do Parents of Children with Down Syndrome Think about Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)?

Authors:  Rachèl V van Schendel; Adriana Kater-Kuipers; Elsbeth H van Vliet-Lachotzki; Wybo J Dondorp; Martina C Cornel; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Facilitating autonomous, confident and satisfying choices: a mixed-method study of women's choice-making in prenatal screening for common aneuploidies.

Authors:  An Chen; Henni Tenhunen; Paulus Torkki; Antti Peltokorpi; Seppo Heinonen; Paul Lillrank; Vedran Stefanovic
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.