Literature DB >> 27435701

Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Anup Kumar1, Srinivas Samavedi2, Anthony S Bates2, Vladimir Mouraviev2, Rafael F Coelho2, Bernardo Rocco2, Vipul R Patel2.   

Abstract

D'Amico high risk prostate cancer is associated with higher incidence of extra prostatic disease. It is recommended to avoid nerve sparing in high risk patients to avoid residual cancer. We report our intermediate term oncologic and functional outcomes in patients with preoperative D'Amico high risk prostate cancer, who underwent selective nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Between Jan 2008 till June 2013, 557 patients underwent RARP for D'Amico high risk prostate cancer. The criteria for nerve sparing were as follows-complete: non palpable disease with <3 cores involvement on prostate biopsy; partial: non palpable disease with <4 cores involvement on prostate biopsy; none: clinically palpable disease with ≥4 cores involvement on prostate biopsy and intraoperative visual cues of locally advanced disease (loss of dissection planes, focal bulge of prostatic capsule). Degree of nerve sparing (NS) was graded intraoperatively by the surgeon independently at either side as side specific margins were assessed to predict subjectivity of the intraoperative judgment. Various data were collected and analyzed. Of 557 patients who underwent RARP 140 underwent complete (group 1), 358 patients underwent partial (group 2), and 59 patients underwent non-nerve-sparing procedure (group 3). There were no difference in preoperative characteristic between the groups (p = 0.678), but group 3 had higher Gleason score sum (p = 0.001), positive cores on biopsy (p = 0.001) and higher t stage (p = 0.001). Postoperatively Extra prostatic extension (p = 0.001), seminal vesicle invasion (p = 0.001), and tumor volume (p < 0.001) were higher in Group 3. Side specific positive surgical margins (PSMs) rates were higher for non-nerve-sparing compared to partial and complete nerve sparing RARP (p < 0.001; overall PSMs = 25.2 %). On univariate and multivariate analysis, nerve sparing did not affect PSMs (p > 0.05). The overall biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate at mean follow-up of 24.3 months was 19.21 %. The continence rate at 3 month was significantly higher in complete NS group in comparison to non-NS group (p = 0.020), however, this difference was not statistically significant at 1 year. Similarly, mean time to continence was significantly lower in complete NS group in comparison to non-NS group (p = 0.030). The potency rate was significantly higher and mean time to potency was significantly lower in complete NS group in comparison to non-NS group (p = 0.010 and 0.020, respectively). In high risk prostate cancer patients, selective nerve sparing during RARP, using the preoperative clinical variables (clinical stage and positive cores on biopsy) and surgeon's intraoperative perception, could provide reasonable intermediate term oncologic, functional outcomes (continence and potency) with acceptable perioperative morbidity and positive surgical margins rate. Use of these preoperative factors and surgeon's intraoperative judgment can appropriately evaluate high risk prostate cancer patients for nerve sparing RARP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High risk prostate cancer; Nerve sparing; Prostatectomy; Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27435701     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  33 in total

1.  Deaths: preliminary data for 2000.

Authors:  A M Minino; B L Smith
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2001-10-09

Review 2.  Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Stefano Cavalleri; Giacomo Novara; Maurizio Aragona; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Andrea Cestari; Antonio Galfano; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Bertrand Guillonneau; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul Patel; Jens Rassweiler; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; J Fondurulia; M H Chen; I Kaplan; C J Beard; J E Tomaszewski; A A Renshaw; A Wein; C N Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rafael F Coelho; Sanket Chauhan; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Kenneth J Palmer; Geoff Coughlin; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery?

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko; Rafael F Coelho; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Oscar Schatloff; Sanket Chauhan; Haidar M Abdul-Muhsin; Rair Jose Valero Carrion; Kenneth J Palmer; Jun Cheon; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Secondary therapy, metastatic progression, and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; Scott E Eggener; Angel M Serio; Brett S Carver; Fernando J Bianco; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer.

Authors:  Brenda K Edwards; Anne-Michelle Noone; Angela B Mariotto; Edgar P Simard; Francis P Boscoe; S Jane Henley; Ahmedin Jemal; Hyunsoon Cho; Robert N Anderson; Betsy A Kohler; Christie R Eheman; Elizabeth M Ward
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Epidemiology of prostate cancer.

Authors:  E David Crawford
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 10.  The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bertram Yuh; Walter Artibani; Axel Heidenreich; Simon Kimm; Mani Menon; Giacomo Novara; Ashutosh Tewari; Karim Touijer; Timothy Wilson; Kevin C Zorn; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  7 in total

1.  Clinical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with nerve sparing vs. non-nerve sparing for high-risk prostate cancer cases.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Takahara; Makoto Sumitomo; Kosuke Fukaya; Takahito Jyoudai; Masashi Nishino; Masaru Hikichi; Kenji Zennami; Takuhisa Nukaya; Manabu Ichino; Naohiko Fukami; Hitomi Sasaki; Mamoru Kusaka; Ryoichi Shiroki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 2.  Selection of patients for nerve sparing surgery in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  André N Vis; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Henk G van der Poel; Alexander Mottrie; Philip D Stricker; Marcus Graefen; Vipul Patel; Bernardo Rocco; Birgit Lissenberg-Witte; Pim J van Leeuwen
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-11-09

3.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the treatment of patients with clinically high-risk localized and locally advanced prostate cancer: single surgeons functional and oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Tae Young Shin; Yong Seong Lee
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Results from a Large Single-institution Series.

Authors:  Paolo Dell'Oglio; Stefano Tappero; Mattia Longoni; Carlo Buratto; Pietro Scilipoti; Silvia Secco; Alberto Olivero; Michele Barbieri; Erika Palagonia; Giancarlo Napoli; Elena Strada; Giovanni Petralia; Dario Di Trapani; Angelo Vanzulli; Aldo Massimo Bocciardi; Antonio Galfano
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-03-04

5.  Concordance between Preoperative mpMRI and Pathological Stage and Its Influence on Nerve-Sparing Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Clara Humke; Benedikt Hoeh; Felix Preisser; Mike Wenzel; Maria N Welte; Lena Theissen; Boris Bodelle; Jens Koellermann; Thomas Steuber; Alexander Haese; Frederik Roos; Luis Alex Kluth; Andreas Becker; Felix K H Chun; Philipp Mandel
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Contemporary seminal vesicle invasion rates in NCCN high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Rocco S Flammia; Benedikt Hoeh; Gabriele Sorce; Francesco Chierigo; Lukas Hohenhorst; Zhen Tian; Jordan A Goyal; Costantino Leonardo; Alberto Briganti; Markus Graefen; Carlo Terrone; Fred Saad; Shahrokh F Shariat; Francesco Montorsi; Felix K H Chun; Michele Gallucci; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.012

7.  Practice Patterns of Korean Urologists Regarding Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy: a Survey and Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Ryu; Yun Beom Kim; Tae Young Jung; Woo Jin Ko; Sun Il Kim; Dongdeuk Kwon; Duk Yoon Kim; Tae Hee Oh; Tag Keun Yoo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.153

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.