| Literature DB >> 27429708 |
Mbaki Muzila1, Kimmo Rumpunen2, Helen Wright3, Helen Roberts3, Melissa Grant3, Hilde Nybom2, Jasna Sehic2, Anders Ekholm2, Cecilia Widén4.
Abstract
Harpagophytum, Devil's Claw, is a genus of tuberiferous xerophytic plants native to southern Africa. Some of the taxa are appreciated for their medicinal effects and have been traditionally used to relieve symptoms of inflammation. The objectives of this pilot study were to investigate the antioxidant capacity and the content of total phenols, verbascoside, isoverbascoside, and selected iridoids, as well as to investigate the capacity of various Harpagophytum taxa in suppressing respiratory burst in terms of reactive oxygen species produced by human neutrophils challenged with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), opsonised Staphylococcus aureus, and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Harpagophytum plants were classified into different taxa according to morphology, and DNA analysis was used to confirm the classification. A putative new variety of H. procumbens showed the highest degree of antioxidative capacity. Using PMA, three Harpagophytum taxa showed anti-inflammatory effects with regard to the PBS control. A putative hybrid between H. procumbens and H. zeyheri in contrast showed proinflammatory effect on the response of neutrophils to F. nucleatum in comparison with treatment with vehicle control. Harpagophytum taxa were biochemically very variable and the response in suppressing respiratory burst differed. Further studies with larger number of subjects are needed to corroborate anti-inflammatory effects of different taxa of Harpagophytum.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27429708 PMCID: PMC4939354 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3841803
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Accessions of Harpagophytum subjected to DNA analysis.
| Accession | Taxon | Location |
|---|---|---|
| (1) B1AZZ |
| Bela-Bela (24°30.7′S, 26°2.27′E) introgression zone |
| (2) B1APH | Putative hybrid (between | Bela-Bela (24°30.7′S, 26°2.27′E) introgression zone |
| (3) K1APN | Putative new variety of | Kumakwane (24°37.9′S, 25°41.1′E) introgression zone |
| (4) K1APH | Putative hybrid (between | Kumakwane (24°37.9′S, 25°41.1′E) introgression zone |
| (5) K1AZZ |
| Kumakwane (24°37.9′S, 25°41.1′E) introgression zone |
| (6) L1APT |
| Leshibitse (24°16.9′S, 26°9.41′E) introgression zone |
| (7) ML1APN | Putative new variety of | Malotwana (24°17.5′S, 26°09.27′E) introgression zone |
| (8) ML1BPN | Putative new variety of | Malotwana (24°17.5′S, 26°09.27′E) introgression zone |
| (9) ML2APN | Putative new variety of | Malotwana (24°17.5′S, 26°09.27′E) introgression zone |
| (10) ML3APN | Putative new variety of | Malotwana (24°17.5′S, 26°09.27′E) introgression zone |
| (11) MP1APH | Putative hybrid (between | Matlapaneng (19°55.4′S, 23°32.9′E) |
| (12) MP1AZS |
| Matlapaneng (19°55.4′S, 23°32.9′E) |
| (13) MP2AZS |
| Matlapaneng (19°55.4′S, 23°32.9′E) |
| (14) MP3AZS |
| Matlapaneng (19°55.4′S, 23°32.9′E) |
| (15) MT1APT |
| Mmathethe |
| (16) O1APH | Putative hybrid (between | Oodi (24°28.1′S, 26°2.83′E) introgression zone |
| (17) O1APT |
| Oodi (24°28.1′S, 26°2.83′E) introgression zone |
| (18) O2APT |
| Oodi (24°28.1′S, 26°2.83′E) introgression zone |
| (19) S1APP |
| Sekoma (24°24.8′S, 23°47.8′E) |
| (20) S2APP |
| Sekoma (24°24.8′S, 23°47.8′E) |
| (21) T1APT |
| Tlokweng (24°37.8′S, 25°59.1′E) introgression zone |
| (22) T1BPT |
| Tlokweng (24°37.8′S, 25°59.1′E) introgression zone |
| (23) T2APT |
| Tlokweng (24°37.8′S, 25°59.1′E) introgression zone |
| (24) T1AZZ |
| Tlokweng (24°37.8′S, 25°59.1′E) introgression zone |
Accessions used in the neutrophil and biochemical study.
Figure 1Sampling sites in Botswana for accessions used in the DNA marker, biochemical and neutrophil studies.
Figure 2Principal component analysis showing ISSR and RAPD marker-based similarity between 24 Harpagophytum accessions used in the DNA and neutrophil study (the 6 accessions within circles). Samples are plotted on the first two components, explaining 29 and 13% of the total variation, respectively. The numbers indicate accession codes, whereas the symbols for the taxa are abbreviated as follows: PP: H. procumbens ssp. procumbens; PT: H. procumbens ssp. transvaalense; PN: putative new variety of H. procumbens ssp. transvaalense; ZS: H. zeyheri ssp. sublobatum; ZZ: H. zeyheri ssp. zeyheri; HH: putative interspecific hybrids (between H. procumbens and H. zeyheri).
Content of total phenols (TP) and antioxidant capacity (FRAP) of Harpagophytum extracts, presented as mean with standard deviation per dry weight (dw) of the plant material (GAE: gallic acid equivalents).
| Accession | Total phenols (mg GAE/g dw) | FRAP ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| 3 | 28.9 | 0.4 | 596.7 | 25.2 |
| 11 | 13.5 | 0.6 | 204.8 | 0.1 |
| 14 | 25.1 | 1.3 | 444.3 | 13.0 |
| 16 | 5.1 | 0.3 | 80.8 | 13.2 |
| 17 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 33.8 | 0.2 |
| 24 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 54.5 | 5.6 |
|
| ||||
| Standard: harpagide | 16.7 | 1.1 | 149.2 | 0.0 |
| Standard: harpagoside | 0.0 | 0.0 | 612.3 | 3.2 |
| Standard: verbascoside | 359.9 | 9.8 | 5854.2 | 52.7 |
Composition of verbascosides and iridoids in each Harpagophytum tuber extract presented as mean value with standard deviation (SD) as mg per g dry weight of the plant material.
| Accession | Verbascoside | Isoverbascoside | Acetylacteoside | Pagoside | Harpagoside | 8- | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| 3 | 3.04 | 0.11 | 21.75 | 1.16 | 4.49 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 4.09 | 0.34 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
| 11 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 6.02 | 0.50 | 3.30 | 0.45 | 0.68 | 0.08 | 9.08 | 0.97 | 4.04 | 0.41 |
| 14 | 4.22 | 0.33 | 15.62 | 1.32 | 1.29 | 0.15 | 0.48 | 0.05 | 7.07 | 0.60 | 3.29 | 0.35 |
| 16 | 0.64 | 0.09 | 2.47 | 0.27 | 0.84 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.96 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.01 |
| 17 | 0.33 | 0.05 | 0.62 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 1.71 | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.01 |
| 24 | 0.39 | 0.08 | 0.64 | 0.14 | 0.41 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
Figure 3Luminol-detected total ROS production by neutrophils stimulated with (a) PBS (no stimulus), (b) opsonised Staphylococcus aureus, (c) Fusobacterium nucleatum, and (d) PMA (25 nM) in the presence of PBS, ethanol, and Accessions 3, 11, 14, 16, 17, and 24 (n = 10). Error bars: 95% CI. All sample results were compared by Wilcoxon two related samples tests.
Figure 4Luminol-detected total ROS production by neutrophils stimulated with (a) PBS or (b) PMA (25 nM) in the presence of PBS, ethanol, harpagoside (0.5 μg/mL), and verbascoside (0.5 μg/mL) (n = 5). Error bars: 95% CI. All sample results were compared by Wilcoxon two related samples tests.