Literature DB >> 12867981

Sustained division of the attentional spotlight.

M M Müller1, P Malinowski, T Gruber, S A Hillyard.   

Abstract

By voluntarily directing attention to a specific region of a visual scene, we can improve our perception of stimuli at that location. This ability to focus attention upon specific zones of the visual field has been described metaphorically as a moveable spotlight or zoom lens that facilitates the processing of stimuli within its 'beam'. A long-standing controversy has centred on the question of whether the spotlight of spatial attention has a unitary beam or whether it can be divided flexibly to disparate locations. Evidence supporting the unitary spotlight view has come from numerous behavioural and electrophysiological studies. Recent experiments, however, indicate that the spotlight of spatial attention may be divided between non-contiguous zones of the visual field for very brief stimulus exposures (&<100 ms). Here we use an electrophysiological measure of attentional allocation (the steady-state visual evoked potential) to show that the spotlight may be divided between spatially separated locations (excluding interposed locations) over more extended time periods. This spotlight division appears to be accomplished at an early stage of visual-cortical processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12867981     DOI: 10.1038/nature01812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  121 in total

1.  Perceiving the tree in the woods: segregating brain responses to stimuli constituting natural scenes.

Authors:  Ulla Martens; Nelson Trujillo-Barreto; Thomas Gruber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The contribution of working memory to divided attention.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Competitive effects on steady-state visual evoked potentials with frequencies in- and outside the α band.

Authors:  Christian Keitel; Søren K Andersen; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Tagging cortical networks in emotion: a topographical analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Keil; Vincent Costa; J Carson Smith; Dean Sabatinelli; E Menton McGinnis; Margaret M Bradley; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Attentional modulation of SSVEP power depends on the network tagged by the flicker frequency.

Authors:  Jian Ding; George Sperling; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  The neural correlates of feature-based selective attention when viewing spatially and temporally overlapping images.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Brett A Clementz; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Different activation patterns for working memory load and visual attention load.

Authors:  D Tomasi; L Chang; E C Caparelli; T Ernst
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Objects do not aid inhibition of return in crossing the vertical meridian.

Authors:  Ulrich W Weger; Naseem Al-Aidroos; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-11-18

9.  Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Keisuke Fukuda; Lisa M May; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  A frequency-tagging electrophysiological method to identify central and peripheral visual field deficits.

Authors:  Noémie Hébert-Lalonde; Lionel Carmant; Dima Safi; Marie-Sylvie Roy; Maryse Lassonde; Dave Saint-Amour
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.