| Literature DB >> 27423703 |
Teresa Madeira1,2,3, Catarina Peixoto-Plácido1,2,3, Beatriz Goulão1,4, Nuno Mendonça1,5, Violeta Alarcão1,2,3, Nuno Santos1,2,3, Rita Machado de Oliveira1,2,3, Agneta Yngve6, Asta Bye7,8, Astrid Bergland7, Carla Lopes9,10, Paulo Nicola1,2, Osvaldo Santos11,12,13, João Gorjão Clara1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Worldwide we are facing a serious demographic challenge due to the dramatic growth of the population over 60 years. It is expected that the proportion of this population will nearly double from 12 to 22 %, between 2015 and 2050. This demographic shift comes with major health and socio-economic concerns. Nutrition is a fundamental determinant of both health and disease and its role in extending a healthy lifespan is the object of considerable research. Notably, malnutrition is one of the main threats to health and quality of life among the elderly. Therefore, knowledge about nutritional status among the elderly is essential for the promotion and maintenance of healthy ageing and to support the development of health protection policies and equity in elderly health care.Entities:
Keywords: Ageing; Elderly; Epidemiological study; Malnutrition; National survey; Nutritional assessment; Nutritional status; Undernutrition
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27423703 PMCID: PMC4947358 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-016-0299-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Fig. 1Map illustrating the seven official territorial division NUTS II regions where data will be collected
Fig. 2Phases of random sampling
Fig. 3Exclusion and Inclusion Criteria
Instruments used in the survey (computer-assisted face-to-face data collection)
| Assessed Constructs | Questionnaire/measure scale | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Health status self-perception | General self-rated health status | Single-item scale, with a five-point scale of answer, from 1 “Poor” to 5 “Excellent” health. This question is extensively used, and is a key predictor of severe morbidity and even mortality [ |
| Physical activity | IPAQ: International Physical Activity Questionnaire, short form | This is a 9-items scale, providing information on the time spent walking, in vigorous and moderate intensity activities and in sedentary activities. It is validated for the Portuguese population [ |
| Food consumption and food patterns | 24 h recall | Dietary assessment will be performed by using a 24 h recall interview. In this interview, respondents are inquired about the food consumed in the previous 24 h, in two random non-consecutive days, without prior notification, within a timeframe between 8 and 15 days. |
| Food Propensity Questionnaire | ||
| Food insecurity | Food insecurity as a measure of hunger due to income limitations represents the condition of the household members as a group. This is a continuous, linear scale [ | |
| Anthropometric measurements | Weight | Individuals wearing minimal clothing without shoes will be measured to the nearest 0.1 kg with a portable calibrated scale (SECA Robusta 813®). |
| Nutritional status | MNA®: | This is the most widely used and validated screening method for identification of frail elderly and geriatric population at nutritional risk. It is recommended by different national and international clinical and scientific organizations as a community useful clinical tool. It is composed by 18-items, giving a maximum score of 30 points. The cut-off of below 24 points is used to identify individuals at-risk and to predict poor outcomes in the elderly [ |
| Cognitive function | MMSE: | This is one of the most widely used instruments in epidemiological studies, as a screening of cognitive impairment. It includes 30 items, assessing temporal and spacial orientation, working memory, recall, attention, arithmetic capacity, linguistic, and visual-motor skills. The maximum score is 30 points (one point per correct item). The minimum cut-off for adequate cognitive functioning is set accordingly to the level of education of the participant [ |
| Emotional status | GDS: Geriatric Depression Scale, Short Form | This is a 15-items instrument to screen for clinical depression among elderly. It excludes somatic symptoms that might be due to medical illness, and makes use of a simple response format: yes/no. The sum of scores allows the categorization of respondents in terms of depressed or non-depressed. The development, validation and factor structure of the shorter GDS-15 was described and evaluated in nursing home populations [ |
| Loneliness | UCLA Loneliness Scale | This is a 16-items scale, with a 4-points Likert-type answer of format (from 1 “never” to 4 “frequently”) which measures loneliness. Scores range from 16 to 64 points (the highest the value the highest the subjective feeling of loneliness or social isolation) [ |
| Functionality | Lawton Scale | This scale measures the instrumental daily living activities of the elderly. It is an 8-itens scale, with a polycotomic format of response, allowing the evaluation of the elderly autonomy to conduct daily life activities. Scores range from 0 to 8 [ |