Literature DB >> 27415450

Capturing a Dynamic Chaperone-Substrate Interaction Using NMR-Informed Molecular Modeling.

Loïc Salmon1, Logan S Ahlstrom1,2, Scott Horowitz1, Alex Dickson2, Charles L Brooks2,3, James C A Bardwell1.   

Abstract

Chaperones maintain a healthy proteome by preventing aggregation and by aiding in protein folding. Precisely how chaperones influence the conformational properties of their substrates, however, remains unclear. To achieve a detailed description of dynamic chaperone-substrate interactions, we fused site-specific NMR information with coarse-grained simulations. Our model system is the binding and folding of a chaperone substrate, immunity protein 7 (Im7), with the chaperone Spy. We first used an automated procedure in which NMR chemical shifts inform the construction of system-specific force fields that describe each partner individually. The models of the two binding partners are then combined to perform simulations on the chaperone-substrate complex. The binding simulations show excellent agreement with experimental data from multiple biophysical measurements. Upon binding, Im7 interacts with a mixture of hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues on Spy's surface, causing conformational exchange within Im7 to slow down as Im7 folds. Meanwhile, the motion of Spy's flexible loop region increases, allowing for better interaction with different substrate conformations, and helping offset losses in Im7 conformational dynamics that occur upon binding and folding. Spy then preferentially releases Im7 into a well-folded state. Our strategy has enabled a residue-level description of a dynamic chaperone-substrate interaction, improving our understanding of how chaperones facilitate substrate folding. More broadly, we validate our approach using two other binding partners, showing that this approach provides a general platform from which to investigate other flexible biomolecular complexes through the integration of NMR data with efficient computational models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27415450      PMCID: PMC5242313          DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b02382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  72 in total

1.  Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with the stringent substrate rhodanese bound to the single-ring variant SR1 of the E. coli chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  Eda Koculi; Reto Horst; Arthur L Horwich; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Quantitative molecular ensemble interpretation of NMR dipolar couplings without restraints.

Authors:  Scott A Showalter; Rafael Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 3.  Mechanisms of protein assembly: lessons from minimalist models.

Authors:  Yaakov Levy; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 22.384

4.  Solution structure of the KIX domain of CBP bound to the transactivation domain of CREB: a model for activator:coactivator interactions.

Authors:  I Radhakrishnan; G C Pérez-Alvarado; D Parker; H J Dyson; M R Montminy; P E Wright
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-12-12       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Characterization of the free-energy landscapes of proteins by NMR-guided metadynamics.

Authors:  Daniele Granata; Carlo Camilloni; Michele Vendruscolo; Alessandro Laio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Structural mapping of a chaperone-substrate interaction surface.

Authors:  Morgane Callon; Björn M Burmann; Sebastian Hiller
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes.

Authors:  F Delaglio; S Grzesiek; G W Vuister; G Zhu; J Pfeifer; A Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Modulation of an IDP binding mechanism and rates by helix propensity and non-native interactions: association of HIF1α with CBP.

Authors:  David De Sancho; Robert B Best
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2011-09-02

9.  Backbone dynamics of a free and phosphopeptide-complexed Src homology 2 domain studied by 15N NMR relaxation.

Authors:  N A Farrow; R Muhandiram; A U Singer; S M Pascal; C M Kay; G Gish; S E Shoelson; T Pawson; J D Forman-Kay; L E Kay
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-05-17       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Super Spy variants implicate flexibility in chaperone action.

Authors:  Shu Quan; Lili Wang; Evgeniy V Petrotchenko; Karl At Makepeace; Scott Horowitz; Jianyi Yang; Yang Zhang; Christoph H Borchers; James Ca Bardwell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Folding while bound to chaperones.

Authors:  Scott Horowitz; Philipp Koldewey; Frederick Stull; James Ca Bardwell
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 2.  Chaperone-client interactions: Non-specificity engenders multifunctionality.

Authors:  Philipp Koldewey; Scott Horowitz; James C A Bardwell
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The Anti-Aggregation Holdase Hsp33 Promotes the Formation of Folded Protein Structures.

Authors:  Fatemeh Moayed; Sergey Bezrukavnikov; Mohsin M Naqvi; Bastian Groitl; Claudia M Cremers; Guenter Kramer; Kingshuk Ghosh; Ursula Jakob; Sander J Tans
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Selecting Conformational Ensembles Using Residual Electron and Anomalous Density (READ).

Authors:  Loïc Salmon; Logan S Ahlstrom; James C A Bardwell; Scott Horowitz
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

5.  The chloroplast-localized small heat shock protein Hsp21 associates with the thylakoid membranes in heat-stressed plants.

Authors:  Katja Bernfur; Gudrun Rutsdottir; Cecilia Emanuelsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  The molecular basis of chaperone-mediated interleukin 23 assembly control.

Authors:  Susanne Meier; Sina Bohnacker; Carolin J Klose; Abraham Lopez; Christian A Choe; Philipp W N Schmid; Nicolas Bloemeke; Florian Rührnößl; Martin Haslbeck; Julia Esser-von Bieren; Michael Sattler; Po-Ssu Huang; Matthias J Feige
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Protein folding while chaperone bound is dependent on weak interactions.

Authors:  Kevin Wu; Frederick Stull; Changhan Lee; James C A Bardwell
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Visualizing chaperone-assisted protein folding.

Authors:  Scott Horowitz; Loïc Salmon; Philipp Koldewey; Logan S Ahlstrom; Raoul Martin; Shu Quan; Pavel V Afonine; Henry van den Bedem; Lili Wang; Qingping Xu; Raymond C Trievel; Charles L Brooks; James C A Bardwell
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 9.  Directed evolution to improve protein folding in vivo.

Authors:  Veronika Sachsenhauser; James Ca Bardwell
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Identifying dynamic, partially occupied residues using anomalous scattering.

Authors:  Serena Rocchio; Ramona Duman; Kamel El Omari; Vitaliy Mykhaylyk; Christian Orr; Zhen Yan; Loïc Salmon; Armin Wagner; James C A Bardwell; Scott Horowitz
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 7.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.