Literature DB >> 21892446

Modulation of an IDP binding mechanism and rates by helix propensity and non-native interactions: association of HIF1α with CBP.

David De Sancho1, Robert B Best.   

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins that acquire their three dimensional structures only upon binding to their targets are very important in cellular signal regulation. While experimental studies have been made on the structures of both bound (structured) and unbound (disordered) states, less is known about the actual folding-binding transition. Coarse grained simulations using native-centric (i.e. Gō) potentials have been particularly useful in addressing this problem, given the large search space for IDP binding, but have well-known deficiencies in reproducing the unfolded state structure and dynamics. Here, we investigate the interaction of HIF1α with CBP using a hierarchy of coarse-grained models, in each case matching the binding affinity at 300 K to the experimental value. Starting from a pure Gō-like model based on the native structure of the complex we go on to consider a more realistic model of helix propensity in the HIF1α, and finally the effect of non-native interactions between binding partners. We find structural disorder (i.e."fuzziness") in the bound state of HIF1α in all models which is supported by the results of atomistic simulations. Correcting the over-stabilized helices in the unbound state gives rise to a more cooperative folding-binding transition (destabilizing partially bound intermediates). Adding non-native contacts lowers the free energy barrier for binding to an almost barrierless scenario, leading to higher binding/unbinding rates relative to the other models, in better agreement with the near diffusion-limited binding rates measured experimentally. Transition state structures for the three models are highly disordered, supporting a fly-casting mechanism for binding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21892446     DOI: 10.1039/c1mb05252g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biosyst        ISSN: 1742-2051


  39 in total

1.  Electrostatically accelerated coupled binding and folding of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Debabani Ganguly; Steve Otieno; Brett Waddell; Luigi Iconaru; Richard W Kriwacki; Jianhan Chen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Peptide Binding to a PDZ Domain by Electrostatic Steering via Nonnative Salt Bridges.

Authors:  Nicolas Blöchliger; Min Xu; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Modeling protein association mechanisms and kinetics.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou; Paul A Bates
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Native contacts determine protein folding mechanisms in atomistic simulations.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Gerhard Hummer; William A Eaton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multiscaled exploration of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered molecular recognition element in measles virus nucleoprotein.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Xiakun Chu; Sonia Longhi; Philippe Roche; Wei Han; Erkang Wang; Jin Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Effects of interactions with the GroEL cavity on protein folding rates.

Authors:  Anshul Sirur; Robert B Best
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Discriminating binding mechanisms of an intrinsically disordered protein via a multi-state coarse-grained model.

Authors:  Michael Knott; Robert B Best
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Multiscale modeling of a conditionally disordered pH-sensing chaperone.

Authors:  Logan S Ahlstrom; Sean M Law; Alex Dickson; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  Describing sequence-ensemble relationships for intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Albert H Mao; Nicholas Lyle; Rohit V Pappu
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Coupled folding and binding with 2D Window-Exchange Umbrella Sampling.

Authors:  Alex Dickson; Logan S Ahlstrom; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.376

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.