David B Matchar1, Choy-Lye Chei2, Zhao-Xue Yin3, Victoria Koh4, Bibhas Chakraborty5, Xiao-Ming Shi3, Yi Zeng6. 1. Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore. Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. david.matchar@duke-nus.edu.sg. 2. Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore. Department of Public Health Medicines, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan. 3. Division of Non-Communicable Disease Control and Community Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China. 4. Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore. 5. Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore. 6. Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development and the Geriatric Division of School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Center for Healthy Aging and Development Studies, National School of Development, Raissun Institute for Advanced Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vitamin D has a neuroprotective function, potentially important for the prevention of cognitive decline. Prospective studies from Western countries support an association between lower vitamin D level and future cognitive decline in elderly people. No prospective study has examined this association in Asia. METHODS: This community-based cohort study of elderly people in China follows 1,202 cognitively intact adults aged ≥60 years for a mean duration of 2 years. Plasma vitamin D level was measured at the baseline. Cognitive state of participants was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Cognitive impairment was defined as an MMSE score <18. Cognitive decline was defined as ≥3 points decline from baseline. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between quartiles of vitamin D levels with cognitive decline and incidence of cognitive impairment. RESULTS: Participants with low vitamin D level had an increased risk of cognitive decline. Compared with the highest quartile of vitamin D levels, the multivariable odds ratios (ORs; 95% confidence interval) for cognitive decline were 2.1 (1.3-3.4) for the second highest quartile, 2.2 (1.4-3.6) for the third highest quartile, and 2.0 (1.2-3.3) for the lowest quartile. The multivariable ORs of incident cognitive impairment for the second highest, third highest, and lowest versus highest quartiles of vitamin D levels were 1.9 (0.9-4.1), 2.6 (1.2-5.6), and 3.2 (1.5-6.6), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This first follow-up study of elderly people, including the oldest-old, in Asia shows that low vitamin D levels were associated with increased risk of subsequent cognitive decline and impairment.
BACKGROUND:Vitamin D has a neuroprotective function, potentially important for the prevention of cognitive decline. Prospective studies from Western countries support an association between lower vitamin D level and future cognitive decline in elderly people. No prospective study has examined this association in Asia. METHODS: This community-based cohort study of elderly people in China follows 1,202 cognitively intact adults aged ≥60 years for a mean duration of 2 years. Plasma vitamin D level was measured at the baseline. Cognitive state of participants was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Cognitive impairment was defined as an MMSE score <18. Cognitive decline was defined as ≥3 points decline from baseline. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between quartiles of vitamin D levels with cognitive decline and incidence of cognitive impairment. RESULTS:Participants with low vitamin D level had an increased risk of cognitive decline. Compared with the highest quartile of vitamin D levels, the multivariable odds ratios (ORs; 95% confidence interval) for cognitive decline were 2.1 (1.3-3.4) for the second highest quartile, 2.2 (1.4-3.6) for the third highest quartile, and 2.0 (1.2-3.3) for the lowest quartile. The multivariable ORs of incident cognitive impairment for the second highest, third highest, and lowest versus highest quartiles of vitamin D levels were 1.9 (0.9-4.1), 2.6 (1.2-5.6), and 3.2 (1.5-6.6), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This first follow-up study of elderly people, including the oldest-old, in Asia shows that low vitamin D levels were associated with increased risk of subsequent cognitive decline and impairment.
Authors: Lu Wang; Yiqing Song; Joann E Manson; Stefan Pilz; Winfried März; Karl Michaëlsson; Annamari Lundqvist; Simerjot K Jassal; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Cuilin Zhang; Charles B Eaton; Heidi T May; Jeffrey L Anderson; Howard D Sesso Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2012-11-13
Authors: Cynthia Balion; Lauren E Griffith; Lisa Strifler; Matthew Henderson; Christopher Patterson; George Heckman; David J Llewellyn; Parminder Raina Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Joshua W Miller; Danielle J Harvey; Laurel A Beckett; Ralph Green; Sarah Tomaszewski Farias; Bruce R Reed; John M Olichney; Dan M Mungas; Charles DeCarli Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Rebecca C Rossom; Mark A Espeland; Joann E Manson; Maurice W Dysken; Karen C Johnson; Dorothy S Lane; Erin S LeBlanc; Frank A Lederle; Kamal H Masaki; Karen L Margolis Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-11-23 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: A Granic; T R Hill; T B L Kirkwood; K Davies; J Collerton; C Martin-Ruiz; T von Zglinicki; B K Saxby; K A Wesnes; D Collerton; J C Mathers; C Jagger Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Andrea L C Schneider; Di Zhao; Pamela L Lutsey; Rebecca F Gottesman; A Richey Sharrett; Andreea M Rawlings; Alvaro Alonso; David Knopman; Thomas H Mosley; Elizabeth Selvin; Erin D Michos Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Mamun Al-Amin; DanaKai Bradford; Robert K P Sullivan; Nyoman D Kurniawan; Yeonsil Moon; Seol-Heui Han; Andrew Zalesky; Thomas H J Burne Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 5.038