| Literature DB >> 30200421 |
Abdur Rahman1, Abdullah Al-Taiar2, Lemia Shaban3, Reem Al-Sabah4, Anwar Al-Harbi5, Olusegun Mojiminiyi6.
Abstract
Several observational studies have reported an association between low levels of vitamin D (VD) and poor cognition in adults, but there is a paucity of data on such an association in adolescents. We investigated the association between VD and cognitive function or academic achievement among 1370 adolescents, who were selected from public middle schools in Kuwait, using stratified multistage cluster random sampling with probability proportional to size. Plasma 25-hydroxy VD (25-OH-D) was measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). An age-adjusted standard score (ASC), calculated from Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices test, was used to evaluate cognitive function; academic achievements were extracted from the schools' records. Data on various covariates were collected from the parents through a self-administered questionnaire and from the adolescents using face-to-face interviews. 25-OH-D was weakly correlated positively with ASC (ρ = 0.06; p = 0.04). Univariable linear regression analysis showed an association between 25-OH-D categories and ASC after adjusting for gender, but adjusting for parental education was sufficient to explain this association. Multivariable analysis showed no association between 25-OH-D and ASC after adjusting for potential confounders whether 25-OH-D was fitted as a continuous variable (p = 0.73), a variable that is categorized by acceptable cutoff points (p = 0.48), or categorized into quartiles (p = 0.88). Similarly, 25-OH-D was not associated with academic performance. We conclude that 25-OH-D is associated with neither cognitive function nor academic performance in adolescents.Entities:
Keywords: 25-hydroxyvitamin D; Raven’s Stranded Progressive Matrices; adolescents; cognitive function; school performance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30200421 PMCID: PMC6165454 DOI: 10.3390/nu10091197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Association between plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D and age-adjusted standard score (Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices test) as well as Students’ Academic Performance.
Figure 2Association between plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D or parathyroid hormone and age-adjusted standard score (Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices test).
Figure 3Association between plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D level and age-adjusted standard score (Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices test) at different level of cognitive function.
Socio-demographic characteristics of 1370 adolescents in public middle schools in Kuwait.
| Characteristics | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12.4 | (0.9) | |
| (%) | ||
| Male | 674 | (49.2) |
| Kuwaiti | 1047 | (76.4) |
| Non-Kuwait | 323 | (23.6) |
| No formal education | 15 | (1.11) |
| Primary/Intermediate | 215 | (16.1) |
| Secondary (high school) | 330 | (24.7) |
| Diploma | 251 | (18.8) |
| University & above | 526 | (39.3) |
| No formal education | 31 | (2.3) |
| Primary/Intermediate | 145 | (10.7) |
| Secondary (high school) | 294 | (21.9) |
| Diploma | 293 | (21.7) |
| University & above | 587 | (43.5) |
| Less than 500 | 89 | (6.7) |
| 500 to 1000 | 291 | (22.0) |
| 1001 to 1500 | 414 | (31.3) |
| 1501 to 2000 | 213 | (16.1) |
| More than 2000 | 164 | (12.4) |
| Do not wish to tell | 153 | (11.6) |
| Housewife | 466 | (34.7) |
| Paid employment | 664 | (49.5) |
| Others | 212 | (15.8) |
| Rented flat | 499 | (36.9) |
| Rented house | 159 | (11.8) |
| Owned flat | 55 | (4.1) |
| Owned house | 638 | (47.2) |
1 Missing for 33 participants; 2 Missing for 20 participants; 3 Missing for 46 participants; 4 Missing for 28 participants; 5 Missing for 19 participants.
Association between plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D and the age-adjusted standard score (Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices test) before and after adjusting for potential confounders.
| Vitamin D Status | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β [95%CI] | β [95%CI] | β [95%CI] | β [95%CI] | β [95%CI] | |
| 25-OH-D levels nmol/L | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.01 |
| [−0.02, 0.08] | [−0.04, 0.07] | [−0.05, 0.06] | [−0.05, 0.06] | [−0.07, 0.05] | |
| 0.23 | 0.70 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.73 | |
| [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | |
| 0.86 | 1.12 | −0.39 | 1.15 | 0.82 | |
| [−2.65, 4.38] | [−2.32, 4.58] | [−4.28, 3.49] | [−2.29, 4.59] | [−2.82, 4.46] | |
| 2.67 | 2.29 | −0.26 | 2.69 | 0.84 | |
| [−0.86, 6.19] | [−1.43, 6.02] | [−6.25−5.72] | [−1.03, 6.41] | [−3.24, 4.92] | |
| 2.91 | 0.95 | −0.70 | 0.50 | −0.42 | |
| [−0.62, 6.43] | [−3.00, 4.90] | [−7.92, 6.53] | [−3.47, 4.47] | [−4.82, 4.01] | |
| 0.30 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.88 | |
| [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | |
| 2.28 | 2.52 | 2.70 | 2.71 | 1.36 | |
| [−0.46, 5.04] | [−0.39, 5.44] | [0.22, 5.63] | [−0.22, 5.63] | [−1.86, 4.59] | |
| 1.40 | −0.66 | −0.93 | −0.94 | −1.53 | |
| [−2.36, 5.16] | [−4.66, 3.34] | [−4.94, 3.09] | [−4.97, 3.08] | [−6.01, 2.94] | |
| 5.46 | 4.98 | 2.79 | 3.02 | 1.47 | |
| [−1.39, 12.31] | [−1.96, 11.92] | [−4.16, 9.74] | [−3.93, 9.98] | [−5.96, 8.91] | |
| 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.48 |
Q1 to Q4: quartile one to quartile four; Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for socio-demographic factors (gender, nationality, governorate, education of the father, education of the mother, type of housing, season of birth, and passive smoking at home); Model 3: adjusted for variables in Model 2 in addition to grade level, sleeping hours during weekends, having nap during weekend, time spent outside during the last 3 months during weekdays and weekends, reporting medical condition, and frequency of consumption of sugary drinks; Model 4: adjusted for variables in Model 3 in addition to BMI categories; Model 5: adjusted for variables in Model 4 in addition to parathyroid hormone, vitamin B12, and transferrin saturation all as quartiles.
Association between plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D and school performance before and after adjusting for potential confounders (Median Regression).
| Vitamin D Status | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β [95%CI] | β [95%CI] | β [95%CI] | β [95%CI] | β [95%CI] | |
| 25-OH-D levels nmol/L | 0.02 | −0.00 | −0.00 | −0.01 | −0.01 |
| [−0.01, 0.06] | [−0.03, 0.03] | [−0.04, 0.03] | [−0.04, 0.03] | [−0.04, 0.03] | |
| 0.22 | 0.94 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.69 | |
| [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | |
| 1.10 | 1.61 | 2.01 | 1.66 | 1.74 | |
| [−1.54, 3.74] | [−0.34, 3.57] | [0.01, 4.01] | [−0.42, 3.75] | [−0.33, 3.80] | |
| 0.40 | 0.70 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 0.94 | |
| [−2.15, 2.95] | [−1.58, 2.99] | [−1.26, 3.21] | [−1.39, 3.20] | [−1.41, 3.30] | |
| 2.60 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 1.40 | 1.67 | |
| [0.06, 5.25] | [−1.51, 3.14] | [−1.38, 3.38] | [−1.03, 3.83] | [−0.86, 4.19] | |
| 0.17 | 0.43 | 0.27 | 0.45 | 0.36 | |
| [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | |
| −0.30 | −1.36 | −0.84 | −0.99 | −0.94 | |
| [−2.35, 1.75] | [−3.04, 0.32] | [−2.65, 0.96] | [−2.73, 0.73] | [−2.88, 0.99] | |
| 2.30 | −0.34 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.38 | |
| [−0.33, 4.93] | [−2.46, 1.77] | [−2.51, 1.88] | [−1.89, 2.47] | [−1.97, 2.73] | |
| 3.10 | −1.71 | −1.27 | −2.12 | −1.99 | |
| [−0.83, 7.03] | [−5.15, 1.73] | [−5.39, 2.84] | [−5.99, 1.74] | [−5.86, 1.89] | |
| 0.08 | 0.38 | 0.78 | 0.35 | 0.45 |
Q1 to Q4: quartile one to quartile four; Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for socio-demographic factors (age, gender, nationality, season of birth, governorate, education of the father, education of the mother, total number of siblings, father income, employment of the mother, type of housing, and child birth order), passive smoking at home, frequency of having breakfast before going to school, and frequency in addition to the number of times the child had breakfast or dinner prepared outside their home; Model 3: adjusted for variables in Model 2 in addition to sleeping hours during weekends having nap during weekend, time of the first meal during weekend and weekdays, and frequency of sugary drinks; Model 4: adjusted for variables in Model 3 in addition to BMI categories; Model 5: adjusted for variables in Model 4 in addition to parathyroid hormone.