BACKGROUND: Vitamin D status has been linked to the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the optimal 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25[OH]-vitamin D) levels for potential cardiovascular health benefits remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 through February 2012 for prospective studies that assessed the association of 25(OH)-vitamin D concentrations with CVD risk. A total of 24 articles met our inclusion criteria, from which 19 independent studies with 6123 CVD cases in 65 994 participants were included for a meta-analysis. In a comparison of the lowest with the highest 25(OH)-vitamin D categories, the pooled relative risk was 1.52 (95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.77) for total CVD, 1.42 (95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.71) for CVD mortality, 1.38 (95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.57) for coronary heart disease, and 1.64 (95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.10) for stroke. These associations remained strong and significant when analyses were limited to studies that excluded participants with baseline CVD and were better controlled for season and confounding. We used a fractional polynomial spline regression analysis to assess the linearity of dose-response association between continuous 25(OH)-vitamin D and CVD risk. The CVD risk increased monotonically across decreasing 25(OH)-vitamin D below ≈60 nmol/L, with a relative risk of 1.03 (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.06) per 25-nmol/L decrement in 25(OH)-vitamin D. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated a generally linear, inverse association between circulating 25(OH)-vitamin D ranging from 20 to 60 nmol/L and risk of CVD. Further research is needed to clarify the association of 25(OH)-vitamin D higher than 60 nmol/L with CVD risk and assess causality of the observed associations.
BACKGROUND:Vitamin D status has been linked to the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the optimal 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25[OH]-vitamin D) levels for potential cardiovascular health benefits remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 through February 2012 for prospective studies that assessed the association of 25(OH)-vitamin D concentrations with CVD risk. A total of 24 articles met our inclusion criteria, from which 19 independent studies with 6123 CVD cases in 65 994 participants were included for a meta-analysis. In a comparison of the lowest with the highest 25(OH)-vitamin D categories, the pooled relative risk was 1.52 (95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.77) for total CVD, 1.42 (95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.71) for CVD mortality, 1.38 (95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.57) for coronary heart disease, and 1.64 (95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.10) for stroke. These associations remained strong and significant when analyses were limited to studies that excluded participants with baseline CVD and were better controlled for season and confounding. We used a fractional polynomial spline regression analysis to assess the linearity of dose-response association between continuous 25(OH)-vitamin D and CVD risk. The CVD risk increased monotonically across decreasing 25(OH)-vitamin D below ≈60 nmol/L, with a relative risk of 1.03 (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.06) per 25-nmol/L decrement in 25(OH)-vitamin D. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated a generally linear, inverse association between circulating 25(OH)-vitamin D ranging from 20 to 60 nmol/L and risk of CVD. Further research is needed to clarify the association of 25(OH)-vitamin D higher than 60 nmol/L with CVD risk and assess causality of the observed associations.
Authors: Harald Dobnig; Stefan Pilz; Hubert Scharnagl; Wilfried Renner; Ursula Seelhorst; Britta Wellnitz; Jürgen Kinkeldei; Bernhard O Boehm; Gisela Weihrauch; Winfried Maerz Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-06-23
Authors: Yan Chun Li; Guilin Qiao; Milan Uskokovic; Wei Xiang; Wei Zheng; Juan Kong Journal: J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.292
Authors: Ivone F O C Nunes; Ana A C M Cavalcante; Marcus V O B Alencar; Marcos D F Carvalho; José L R Sarmento; Nayra S C C A Teixeira; Adriana A Paiva; Lídia R Carvalho; Leopoldo F M Nascimento; Maria S P Cruz; Marcelo M Rogero; Andréia C B Lima; Cecilia M R G Carvalho Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Huicui Meng; Nirupa R Matthan; Edith Angellotti; Anastassios G Pittas; Alice H Lichtenstein Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Marcella D Walker; Elaine Cong; Anna Kepley; Marco R Di Tullio; Tatjana Rundek; Shunichi Homma; James A Lee; Rui Liu; Polly Young; Chiyuan Zhang; Donald J McMahon; Shonni J Silverberg Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Pamela L Lutsey; Christina M Parrinello; Jeffrey R Misialek; Andy N Hoofnagle; Clark M Henderson; Thomas J Laha; Erin D Michos; John H Eckfeldt; Elizabeth Selvin Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 8.327