| Literature DB >> 27411342 |
Prasad Gunasekaran, Sidakpal Panaich, Alexandros Briasoulis, Shaun Cardozo, Luis Afonso1.
Abstract
Subclinical left ventricular (LV) dysfunction refers to subtle abnormalities in LV function which typically precede a reduction in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The assessment of myocardial function using LVEF, a radial metric of systolic function, is subject to load dependence, intra-observer and inter-observer variability. Reductions in LVEF typically manifest late in the disease process thus compromising the ability to intervene before irreversible impairment of systolic performance sets in. 2-Dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE), a novel strain imaging modality has shown promise as a sensitive indicator of myocardial contractility. It arms the clinician with a powerful and practical tool to rapidly quantify cardiac mechanics, circumventing several inherent limitations of conventional echocardiography. This article highlights the incremental utility of 2D-STE in the detection of subclinical LV dysfunction.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27411342 PMCID: PMC5324318 DOI: 10.2174/1573403x12666160712095938
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Cardiol Rev ISSN: 1573-403X
Studies evaluating strain in valvular heart disease with speckle tracking echocardiography.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Mizariene | Chronic AR:NT-proBNP<400 (n=44) vs. >400 vs. controls (n=64) | 2D-STE (EchoPac-GE) | Effect of LV strain on NT-proBNP | GLS>-16% predicts levels>400 | ||||
| Olsen | Chronic AR: Surgical (n=29) vs. conservative (n=35) | 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | Strain indices in AR progression | Progression correlates with reduced systolic (-1.04 vs. -1.19s-1), early diastolic (1.2 vs. 1.6s-1) and myocardial SR (-16.3 vs. -19%) | ||||
| Smedsrud | Chronic AR (n=47) vs. controls (n=31) | 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | GLS impairment and early LV dysfunction | Reduced GLS (-17.5 vs.-22.1%) identifies subclinical LV dysfunction; GLS and not LVEF correlates with post-operative LV function | ||||
| Kaneko | Chronic AR (n=36) vs. controls (n=15) | 2D-STE (Toshiba) | GRS decline-marker of myocardial dysfunction? | Endocardial GRS loss (28.9 vs. 37.1%) predicts myocardial dysfunction | ||||
| Di Salvo | Stable (n=17) vs. progressive AR (n=9) | 2D-STE (EchoPAC) | Strain parameters and AR progression | LV LS (cut-off >-19.5%) - only predictor for AR Progression | ||||
| Van Dalen | AS (n=60) vs. controls (n=30) | 2D-STE (QLAB-Philips) | Twist indices and severity of AS, subendocardial ischemia | Elevated peak systolic LV twist (13.6 vs. 11.4) and endocardial twist-shortening ratio (0.6vs.0.4) correlates with ischemia and AS severity | ||||
| Ng | Aortic sclerosis (n=118) vs. Mild (n=81) vs. moderate (n=109) vs. severe (n=112) AS | 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | Strain and severity of AS | Sequential deterioration in LS, CS, RS and SR correlates with progressive reduction in valve area | ||||
| Levy | Severe symptomatic AS | 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | GLS on post-surgical atrial fibrillation rates | GLS>-15% predicts post-surgical atrial fibrillation | ||||
| Delgado | Severe AS (n=73) vs. controls (n=40) | 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | Changes in LV strain pre and post-surgery | GLS (-14.6 vs. -20.3%) and SR-impaired despite pEF. LS, CS and RS improved following valve replacement | ||||
| Ozdemir | Mild-moderate MS (n=60) vs. controls (n=52) | 2D-ECHO, STE (EchoPAC-GE) | LV dysfunction in MS with pEF | GLS (-17 vs.-19%) and GLS rate compromised in MS | ||||
| Isla | Chronic severe MR (n=38) | 2D, 3D-ECHO, Doppler ECHO and 2D-STE (Q-Lab) | Preoperative strain on post-operative LV dysfunction | Longitudinal SR at mid interventricular septal level <-0.8s-1 -best predictors of LVEF reduction > 10% | ||||
| Kim | Chronic severe MR (n=59) vs. controls (n=34) | 2D-ECHO,angiography and 2D-STE (EchoPac-GE) | Strain assessment of latent LV dysfunction | Peak systolic radial SR of 2.0 s-1 best correlates with peak dP/dt; short axis function offers better prediction | ||||
| Florescu | Severe primary MR (n=28) vs. controls (n=10) | 2D-ECHO, TVI and STE (EchoPac-GE) | Pre-op strain and post-valve replacement LV function | Systolic TVI and the combination of systolic TVI and LS are main independent predictors of post-operative LVEF drop >10% | ||||
| Pandis | Degenerative MR (n=40) | 2D, 3D-ECHO, and 2D-STE (TomTec) | Predictors of recurrent MR post-surgery | Mid-lateral RS≤-27 and apical lateral RS ≤-25-significant predictors | ||||
| Mascle | Severe degenerative MR: post op LVEF≥50% (n=73) + LVEF<50% (n=15) | 2D-ECHO, 2D-STE and TDI (EchoPAC-GE) | Pre-operative GLS on post-operative LV dysfunction | GLS >-18% predicts post-operative LVEF drop to <50% | ||||
2D, 2 dimensional; 3D, 3 dimensional; AS, aortic stenosis; AR, aortic regurgitation; CS, circumferential strain; ECHO, echocardiography; GLS, global longitudinal strain; GRS, global radial strain; LS, longitudinal strain; LV, left ventricle; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MS, mitral stenosis; MR, mitral regurgitation; NT-proBNP, N terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide; pEF, preserved ejection fraction; RS, radial strain; SR, strain rate; TDI, tissue Doppler imaging; TVI, tissue velocity imaging.
Studies highlighting utility of speckle tracking echocardiography in subclinical coronary artery disease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nucifora | Non-obstructive (n=60) vs. obstructive (n=63) vs. no CAD (n=59) | CT angiography and 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | GLS prediction of obstructive CAD | GLS≥-17.4% predicts obstructive CAD better than diastolic dysfunction or Duke clinical scores |
| Hanekom | Significant CAD (150) | 2D-STE, TVI, DSE and coronary angiography (EchoPAC-GE) | Strain from STE vs. TVI during DSE in predicting obstructive CAD | STE-equally efficacious to TVI in anterior but not in posterior circulation |
| Liang | Obstructive (n=39) vs. non-obstructive or no CAD (n=15) | 2D-STE, coronary angiography (EchoPAC-GE) | Diastolic strain in obstructive CAD | Early diastolic SR impairment is superior to systolic strain: 77% sensitive, 93% specific |
| Tsai | CAD (n=75) vs. no CAD (n=77) | STE, coronary angiography (EchoPAC-GE) | LS in prediction of obstructive CAD | Sensitivity, specificity of GLS>-19%: 75%, 81%; peak segmental LS difference/peak systolic GLS ratio>1: 77%, 79% |
| Smedsrud | Significant (n=43) vs. non-significant CAD (n=43) | 2D-STE, coronary angiography (EchoPac-GE) | Does duration of early systolic lengthening predict significant CAD? | Early systolic lengthening (cutoff 58 milliseconds) predicts significant CAD better than peak systolic LS attenuation |
2D-STE, 2 dimensional-speckle tracking echocardiography; CAD, coronary artery disease; CT, computerized tomography; DSE, dobutamine stress echocardiography; GLS, global longitudinal strain; LS, longitudinal strain; pEF, preserved ejection fraction; SR, strain rate; TVI, tissue velocity imaging.
Evaluation of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with speckle tracking echocardiography.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phan | HfPEF (n=47) vs. young (n=27) vs. old controls (n=26) | 2D-ECHO, 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | Comparing strain profiles: HfPEF vs. age related changes | Increased TS seen with ageing. CS increase (-24.7% vs. -20%) differentiates HfPEF from old controls |
| Phan | HfPEF (n=38) vs. controls (n=33) | 2D-ECHO and 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | Dyssynchrony assessment in HfPEF | Systolic and diastolic dyssynchrony observed. LS impairment (-17.6% vs. -19.9%) and higher LV dyssynchrony (LS delay index-14.4% vs.-10.7%) noted |
| Donal | HfPEF (n=21) vs. controls (n=15) | 2D-ECHO, exercise stress testing and 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | To characterize resting and exercise induced strain changes | GLS impaired at rest [Rest: (-16% vs. -20%) and aggravated by stress: (-17% vs. -23%); similar trend with global CS |
| Kraigher-Krainer | HfPEF (n=219) vs. controls (n=50) and Hypertensive Heart Disease (n=44) | Vendor independent STE Software | Strain parameters in HfPEF | Lower LS and CS in HfPEF (-14.6±3.3 vs.. 20.0±2.1 in controls); Lower LS values co-related with higher NT-ProBNP |
2D, 2 dimensional; CS, circumferential strain; ECHO, echocardiography; GLS, global longitudinal strain; HfPEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; LS, longitudinal strain; RS, radial strain; STE, speckle tracking echocardiography; TS: torsional strain; BNP: Brain Natiuretic Peptide.
Strain imaging in the assessment of chemotherapy associated cardio toxicity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tsai | Hodgkin's lymphoma and radiotherapy (n=47) [AT (n=27), No AT (n=20)] vs. controls (n=20) | 2D-ECHO and 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | LV dysfunction with anthracycline (AT) and radiotherapy (RT) | Higher GLS impairment in RT+AT (-16.1%) than RT and no AT (-17.5%); CS-similar trend; pEF-all groups |
| Poterucha | AT (n=19) vs. controls (n=19) | 2D-ECHO and 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | Temporal changes in strain and LVEF | Longitudinal PSS reduction started at 4 months (8.7%) and worsened by 8 months (9.2%) with AT. LVEF decreased by 4.3% only at 8 months. |
| Motoki | AT therapy (n=25) | 2D-ECHO, TDI and 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | Torsional strain and subclinical LV dysfunction | Impairment in GLS, TS, twisting and untwisting rates occur as early as 1 month; LVEF, TDI indices-preserved |
| Ho | AT (n=19) vs. AT+TZ (n=51) vs. controls (n=50) | 2D-ECHO, Doppler ECHO and 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | Subclinical LV dysfunction in combination therapy (AT+TZ) | Reduced GLS in AT (-17.7) vs. AT+TZ (-19.2) vs. controls (-19.6). No additive cardiotoxicity with TZ |
| Fallah-Rad | No toxicity (n=10) vs. TZ toxicity (n=32) | TVI, CMR and 2D-STE (EchoPac-GE) | Detection of TZ cardiotoxicity with various techniques | 2D-STE impairment in GLS (-19.9 ± 1.8% to. -16.4 ± 1.1%) and GRS (42.4 ± 10.5% to. 32.5 ± 15.2%) occur earliest (3 months). LVEF preserved until 6 months |
2D-ECHO, 2 dimensional echocardiography; 2D-STE, 2 dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography; AT, anthracycline; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; CS, circumferential strain; GLS, global longitudinal strain; GRS, global radial strain; LV, left ventricle; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; pEF, preserved ejection fraction; PSS, peak systolic strain; RS, radial strain; RT, radiotherapy; TS, torsional strain; TDI, tissue Doppler imaging; TZ, trastuzumab.
Miscellaneous conditions underscoring the clinical applicability of speckle tracking echocardiography.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yagmur | Behcets disease (n=32) vs. controls (n=27) | 2D-ECHO and 2D-STE (QLab-Philips) | Detection of subclinical LV dysfunction | Reduced LS (-17.8 ± 2.7%) in disease vs. controls (-20.5 ± 1.8%); NT-proBNP independent corelate of mean LS |
| Liu | Hemodialysis patients (n=102) | 2D-ECHO, TDI and 2D-STE (EchoPac-GE) | Predictors of significant CAD despite pEF in hemodialysis patients | Reduction in LS ≥-15% in ≥6 myocardial segments predicts CAD |
| Dedobbeleer | Friedreich’s ataxia (n=20) vs. controls (n=20) | 2D-ECHO and 2D-STE (Qlab-Philips) | Stain profiling, detection of subclinical LV dysfunction | Reduced GLS (-15.3 vs. -17.5%), peak LV twist and untwisting rates |
| Caputo | At least 1 cardiovascular risk factor (n=70) | 2D-ECHO, TDI and 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | Abnormal LV strain in overweight (BMI) despite pEF | Peak LS of LV-reduced in overweight vs. normal BMI (-17.2% vs. -18.7%) |
| Takamura | Acute PE (n=25) vs. controls (n=25) | 2D-ECHO and 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | Impact of acute RV pressure overload on LV strain | Global LS (-16 vs. -20), CS (-17 vs. -24) and RS (44 vs. 59) reduced in acute PE, recover with the resolution of pressure overload |
| Shahul | Preeclampsia (n=11) vs. non-proteinuric hypertension (n=11) vs. normotensives (n=17) | 2D-ECHO and 2D-STE (TomTec) | Is subclinical LV dysfunction inherent to preeclampsia? | Impaired GLS (-13.7 vs. -15.9 vs. -20.1), GRS (22.4 vs. 40.7 vs. 39.8) and GCS (-17.9 vs. -28.2 vs. -21.6) in preeclampsia. pEF in all groups |
| Inoue | RV apical pacing (n=51)+ RV septal pacing (n=52) vs. controls (n=50) | 2D-ECHO and 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | Subclinical LV dysfunction with RV apical pacing | Maximal impairment of GLS with RV apical pacing [-14.3 vs. -16.8 vs. -18.2] |
| Miszalski-Jamka | Wegener's granulomatosis (n=22) vs. controls (n=22) | 2D-ECHO and 2D-STE (EchoPAC-GE) | Subclinical LV dysfunction identification | Global LS (-17.9 vs.-19.7), CS (-18.4 vs. -21.6) and RS (38.8 vs. 50.1) impairment noted, correlate with disease severity. |
2D-ECHO, 2 dimensional echocardiography; 2D-STE, 2 dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography; BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; CS, circumferential strain; GCS, global circumferential strain, GRS, global radial strain; LS, longitudinal strain; LV, left ventricle; PE, pulmonary embolism; pEF, preserved ejection fraction; RS, radial strain; RV, right ventricle; TDI, tissue Doppler imaging.