Literature DB >> 19356402

Disparate patterns of left ventricular mechanics differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Partho P Sengupta1, Vijay K Krishnamoorthy, Walter P Abhayaratna, Josef Korinek, Marek Belohlavek, Thoralf M Sundt, Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran, Farouk Mookadam, James B Seward, A Jamil Tajik, Bijoy K Khandheria.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the longitudinal, circumferential, and radial mechanics of the left ventricle (LV) in patients with constrictive pericarditis (CP) and restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM).
BACKGROUND: Diastolic dysfunction in CP is related to epicardial tethering and pericardial constraint, whereas in RCM it is predominantly characterized by subendocardial dysfunction. Assessment of variations in longitudinal and circumferential deformation of LV might be useful to distinguish these 2 conditions.
METHODS: Longitudinal, radial, and circumferential mechanics of the LV were quantified by 2-dimensional speckle tracking of B-mode cardiac ultrasound images in 26 patients with CP, 19 patients with RCM, and 21 control subjects.
RESULTS: In comparison with control subjects, patients with CP had significantly reduced circumferential strain (base; -16 +/- 6% vs. -9 +/- 6%; p < 0.016), torsion (3 +/- 1 degrees /cm vs. 1 +/- 1 degrees /cm; p < 0.016), and early diastolic apical untwisting velocities (E(r); 116 +/- 62 degrees /s vs. -36 +/- 50 degrees /s; p < 0.016), whereas longitudinal strains, displacement, and early diastolic velocities at the LV base (E(m)) were similar to control subjects. In contrast, patients with RCM showed significantly reduced longitudinal displacement (base; 14.7 +/- 2.5 cm vs. 9.8 +/- 2.8 cm; p < 0.016) and E(m) (-8.7 +/- 1.3 cm/s vs. -4.4 +/- 1.1 cm/s; p < 0.016), whereas circumferential strain and E(r) were similar to those of control subjects. For differentiation of CP from RCM, the area under the curve was significantly higher for E(m) in comparison with E(r) (0.97 vs. 0.76, respectively; p = 0.01). After pericardiectomy, there was a significant decrease in longitudinal early diastolic LV basal myocardial velocities (7.4 cm/s vs. 6.8 cm/s; p = 0.023). Circumferential strain, torsion, and E(r), however, remained unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: Deformation of the LV is constrained in the circumferential direction in CP and in the longitudinal direction in RCM. Subsequent early diastolic recoil of LV is also attenuated in each of the 2 directions, respectively, uniquely differentiating the abnormal diastolic restoration mechanics of the LV seen in CP and RCM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19356402     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  24 in total

Review 1.  Echocardiography in pericardial diseases: new developments.

Authors:  Gabriella Veress; Dali Feng; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  New Cardiac Imaging Algorithms to Diagnose Constrictive Pericarditis Versus Restrictive Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ahmad Mahmoud; Manish Bansal; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in Loeffler endocarditis: case report from the MAGYAR-Path Study.

Authors:  A Nemes; A Kalapos; P Domsik; I Marton; Z Borbényi; T Forster
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography in Cardio-Oncology and Beyond.

Authors:  Raymundo A Quintana; Linh P Bui; Rohit Moudgil; Nicolas Palaskas; Saamir Hassan; Jun-Ichi Abe; Elie Mouhayar; Syed Wamique Yusuf; Antonieta Hernandez; Jose Banchs
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-04-01

Review 5.  Role of non-invasive imaging in the work-up of cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Lakshmi S Tummala; Raymond K Young; Tania Singh; Sandeep Jani; Monvadi B Srichai
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Multimodality Imaging for the Assessment of Pericardial Diseases.

Authors:  Michael Chetrit; Bo Xu; Beni R Verma; Allan L Klein
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Cognitive Machine-Learning Algorithm for Cardiac Imaging: A Pilot Study for Differentiating Constrictive Pericarditis From Restrictive Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Partho P Sengupta; Yen-Min Huang; Manish Bansal; Ali Ashrafi; Matt Fisher; Khader Shameer; Walt Gall; Joel T Dudley
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  Regional left atrial function differentiation in patients with constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: a study using speckle tracking echocardiography.

Authors:  Shuang Liu; Chunyan Ma; Weidong Ren; Jing Zhang; Nan Li; Jun Yang; Yan Zhang; Wei Qiao
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Constrictive pericarditis--a curable diastolic heart failure.

Authors:  Faisal F Syed; Hartzell V Schaff; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Emerging imaging targets for infiltrative cardiomyopathy: Inflammation and fibrosis.

Authors:  Frank M Bengel; Tobias L Ross
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.