BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional strain imaging allows rapid and accurate analysis of regional left ventricular (LV) principal strains in the longitudinal, radial, and circumferential directions. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of subtle differences in LV principal strains to characterize features of subclinical LV dysfunction in patients with systemic hypertension and apparently preserved LV systolic function. METHODS: 2-dimensional echocardiographic (2DE) images of the LV were acquired in apical 4-chamber and parasternal short-axis at the basal, mid, and apical levels in 59 subjects, including 25 healthy controls (33 ± 4 yrs, 14 male) and 34 patients with systemic hypertension (36 ± 3 yrs, 24 male). Longitudinal (LS), circumferential (CS) and radial strains (RS) were quantified in an 18-segment model using a novel speckle tracking system (2D Cardiac Performance Analysis, TomTec Imaging System, Munich, Germany). RESULTS: In comparison with normal controls, peak LS was markedly attenuated in the subendocardial and subepicardial regions in patients with systemic hypertension. However, circumferential strain was reduced only in subepicardial region; radial strain was not significantly different in the two groups. The subendocardial-to-subepicardial gradient of circumferential deformation correlated with the radial strains in both controls and hypertensive patients (R = 0.87, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite reduced longitudinal shortening, LV wall thickening in patients with systemic hypertension remains unaltered due to relatively preserved circumferential shortening. Characterizing the disparities in LV principal strains reveals the presence of subclinical LV dysfunction and provides unique insights into functional adaptations that maintain global LV ejection fraction in patients with systemic hypertension.
BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional strain imaging allows rapid and accurate analysis of regional left ventricular (LV) principal strains in the longitudinal, radial, and circumferential directions. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of subtle differences in LV principal strains to characterize features of subclinical LV dysfunction in patients with systemic hypertension and apparently preserved LV systolic function. METHODS: 2-dimensional echocardiographic (2DE) images of the LV were acquired in apical 4-chamber and parasternal short-axis at the basal, mid, and apical levels in 59 subjects, including 25 healthy controls (33 ± 4 yrs, 14 male) and 34 patients with systemic hypertension (36 ± 3 yrs, 24 male). Longitudinal (LS), circumferential (CS) and radial strains (RS) were quantified in an 18-segment model using a novel speckle tracking system (2D Cardiac Performance Analysis, TomTec Imaging System, Munich, Germany). RESULTS: In comparison with normal controls, peak LS was markedly attenuated in the subendocardial and subepicardial regions in patients with systemic hypertension. However, circumferential strain was reduced only in subepicardial region; radial strain was not significantly different in the two groups. The subendocardial-to-subepicardial gradient of circumferential deformation correlated with the radial strains in both controls and hypertensivepatients (R = 0.87, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite reduced longitudinal shortening, LV wall thickening in patients with systemic hypertension remains unaltered due to relatively preserved circumferential shortening. Characterizing the disparities in LV principal strains reveals the presence of subclinical LV dysfunction and provides unique insights into functional adaptations that maintain global LV ejection fraction in patients with systemic hypertension.
Authors: Aleksandr Rovner; Lisa de las Fuentes; Alan D Waggoner; Nada Memon; Rizwana Chohan; Victor G Dávila-Román Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Thor Edvardsen; Boaz D Rosen; Li Pan; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Shenghan Lai; W Gregory Hundley; Shantanu Sinha; Richard A Kronmal; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1989 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Thomas Helle-Valle; Jonas Crosby; Thor Edvardsen; Erik Lyseggen; Brage H Amundsen; Hans-Jørgen Smith; Boaz D Rosen; João A C Lima; Hans Torp; Halfdan Ihlen; Otto A Smiseth Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-11-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Wojciech Kosmala; Rafal Plaksej; Joerg M Strotmann; Carla Weigel; Sebastian Herrmann; Marcus Niemann; Hanna Mende; Stefan Störk; Christiane E Angermann; Jens A Wagner; Frank Weidemann Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Attila Kovács; Andrea Ágnes Molnár; Márton Kolossváry; Bálint Szilveszter; Alexisz Panajotu; Bálint Károly Lakatos; Levente Littvay; Ádám Domonkos Tárnoki; Dávid László Tárnoki; Szilard Voros; György Jermendy; Partho P Sengupta; Béla Merkely; Pál Maurovich-Horvat Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 3.738