Literature DB >> 2740970

Cervical or thoracic anastomosis for esophagectomy for carcinoma.

V M Chasseray1, G K Kiroff, J L Buard, B Launois.   

Abstract

A prospective trial was conducted to compare intrathoracic and cervical anastomoses after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the middle or lower one-third of the esophagus. One hundred and twenty-three patients were randomized to have either a cervical or thoracic anastomosis. Thirty-one patients were subsequently excluded either because esophagectomy was performed without thoracotomy or the tumor was unresectable or because the randomization protocol was not complied with. Transfusion requirements and operating time were similar for the 49 patients having esophagectomy by way of the laparotomy and right thoracotomy (TA) and the 43 patients who underwent laparotomy, right thoracotomy and cervicotomy (CA). Forty-three per cent of the CA and 49 per cent of the TA patients had involved lymph nodes. An esophagectomy incorporating a cervical anastomosis resulted in a significantly greater margin of macroscopically normal esophagus above the tumor (median of 4.0 versus 1.5 centimeters for TA). A leak was significantly more frequent after cervical anastomosis (26 per cent) than thoracic (4 per cent) (p less than 0.002). Respiratory complications were more frequent with a thoracic anastomosis, but this was not statistically significant. Thirty day mortality rates were similar for the two groups: 14.3 per cent, TA, and 9.3 per cent, CA (p = N.S.). Postoperative strictures occurred in 14 per cent of TA and 23 per cent of CA patients and were most common after an anastomotic leak. The survival patterns of the two groups were similar. The median survival time for CA patients was 23 months and for TA, 20 months. Excluding hospital mortality, 47 per cent of patients were alive at two years and 30 per cent at 40 months. Survival was related to extent of disease. The greater length of tumor-free esophagus removed with a cervical anastomosis did not result in an improved long term survival period, but was associated with a significantly higher incidence of anastomotic fistula.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2740970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0039-6087


  22 in total

Review 1.  Oesophageal surgery.

Authors:  E J Simchuk; D Alderson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Mid-term outcomes of side-to-side stapled anastomosis in cervical esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Won-Min Jo; Jae Seung Shin; In Sung Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Surgery for esophageal and cardia cancer in Hungary: a nationwide retrospective five-year survey.

Authors:  J Faller
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Should oesophagectomy be performed with cervical or intrathoracic anastomosis?

Authors:  Babar Kayani; Omar A Jarral; Thanos Athanasiou; Emmanouil Zacharakis
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-24

Review 5.  Update on staging and surgical treatment options for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  [Surgical stapler technique for gastric tube formation and anastomosis after esophageal resection].

Authors:  W Wahl; T Junginger; T Böttger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1992

Review 7.  Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature.

Authors:  Robert C G Martin; Murray F Brennan; David P Jaques
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  [Anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  K Schwameis; J Zacherl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Risk analysis in resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  S Y Law; M Fok; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Anastomosis.

Authors:  R Bardini; M Asolati; A Ruol; L Bonavina; S Baseggio; A Peracchia
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.