Literature DB >> 21487832

Update on staging and surgical treatment options for esophageal cancer.

Donald E Low1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal cancer remains a challenging clinical problem, with overall long-term survivorship consistently at a level of approximately 30%. The incidence of esophageal cancer is increasing worldwide, with the most dramatic increase being seen with respect to esophageal adenocarcinoma. DISCUSSION: Pretreatment staging accuracy has improved with the utilization of CT and PET scans, as well as endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic mucosal resection. In an increasing percentage of patients, endoscopic techniques are being utilized in selected patients for the treatment of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's and intramucosal cancer. Surgery remains the treatment of choice in all appropriate patients with invasive and locoregional esophageal cancer, although multimodality therapy is now used in most patients with stage II or stage III disease.
CONCLUSION: Outcomes for esophagectomy have been dominated by concerns regarding high mortality and morbidity; however, mortality rates associated with esophageal resection have dramatically decreased, especially in high-volume specialty centers. This manuscript highlights some of the evolutionary issues associated with staging and endoscopic and surgical treatments of Barrett's and esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21487832     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1515-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  92 in total

1.  Hospital volume and hospital mortality for esophagectomy.

Authors:  J J van Lanschot; J B Hulscher; C J Buskens; H W Tilanus; F J ten Kate; H Obertop
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  T2N0M0 esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; David P Mason; Sudish C Murthy; Gregory Zuccaro; David J Adelstein; Lisa A Rybicki; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  National trends in esophageal surgery--are outcomes as good as we believe?

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Joseph Anton Galanko; Michael Owen Meyers; Richard Harry Feins; Timothy Michael Farrell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Oesophagectomy remains the gold standard for treatment of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Vijay Sujendran; Giuseppe Sica; Bryan Warren; Nicholas Maynard
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  A comprehensive evaluation for aspiration after esophagectomy reduces the incidence of postoperative pneumonia.

Authors:  Mark F Berry; B Zane Atkins; Betty C Tong; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark W Onaitis
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 7.  A systematic review of the evidence for radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Thomas Semlitsch; Klaus Jeitler; Rainer Schoefl; Karl Horvath; Nicole Pignitter; Franz Harnoncourt; Andrea Siebenhofer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Postoperative pulmonary complications are associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes after extended esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shoichi Kinugasa; Mitsuo Tachibana; Hiroshi Yoshimura; Shuhei Ueda; Toshiyuki Fujii; Dipok Kumar Dhar; Takeru Nakamoto; Naofumi Nagasue
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Catastrophic complications of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  M D Iannettoni; R I Whyte; M B Orringer
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Respiratory complications after surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. A study of 309 patients according to the type of resection.

Authors:  P Dumont; J M Wihlm; J G Hentz; N Roeslin; R Lion; G Morand
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.191

View more
  5 in total

1.  Localization of thoracic duct using heavily T2W MRI for intractable post-esophagectomy chylothorax-a case report.

Authors:  Yi-Chien Chang; Yi-Ting Yen; Ming-Chung Chang; Yau-Lin Tseng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Impact of a multidisciplinary tumour board meeting for upper-GI malignancies on clinical decision making: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Pieter van Hagen; Manon C W Spaander; Ate van der Gaast; Caroline M van Rij; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot; Bas P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Murine and human tissue-engineered esophagus form from sufficient stem/progenitor cells and do not require microdesigned biomaterials.

Authors:  Ryan Gregory Spurrier; Allison L Speer; Xiaogang Hou; Wael N El-Nachef; Tracy C Grikscheit
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  Chylothorax after esophagectomy for cancer: impact of the surgical approach and neoadjuvant treatment: systematic review and institutional analysis.

Authors:  Michael Kranzfelder; Ralf Gertler; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Helmut Friess; Marcus Feith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Mitogen activated protein kinase kinase kinase 3 (MAP3K3/MEKK3) overexpression is an early event in esophageal tumorigenesis and is a predictor of poor disease prognosis.

Authors:  Raghibul Hasan; Rinu Sharma; Anoop Saraya; Tushar K Chattopadhyay; Siddartha DattaGupta; Paul G Walfish; Shyam S Chauhan; Ranju Ralhan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.