Donald E Low1. 1. Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, C6-GS, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. donald.low@vmmc.org
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Esophageal cancer remains a challenging clinical problem, with overall long-term survivorship consistently at a level of approximately 30%. The incidence of esophageal cancer is increasing worldwide, with the most dramatic increase being seen with respect to esophageal adenocarcinoma. DISCUSSION: Pretreatment staging accuracy has improved with the utilization of CT and PET scans, as well as endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic mucosal resection. In an increasing percentage of patients, endoscopic techniques are being utilized in selected patients for the treatment of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's and intramucosal cancer. Surgery remains the treatment of choice in all appropriate patients with invasive and locoregional esophageal cancer, although multimodality therapy is now used in most patients with stage II or stage III disease. CONCLUSION: Outcomes for esophagectomy have been dominated by concerns regarding high mortality and morbidity; however, mortality rates associated with esophageal resection have dramatically decreased, especially in high-volume specialty centers. This manuscript highlights some of the evolutionary issues associated with staging and endoscopic and surgical treatments of Barrett's and esophageal cancer.
INTRODUCTION:Esophageal cancer remains a challenging clinical problem, with overall long-term survivorship consistently at a level of approximately 30%. The incidence of esophageal cancer is increasing worldwide, with the most dramatic increase being seen with respect to esophageal adenocarcinoma. DISCUSSION: Pretreatment staging accuracy has improved with the utilization of CT and PET scans, as well as endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic mucosal resection. In an increasing percentage of patients, endoscopic techniques are being utilized in selected patients for the treatment of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's and intramucosal cancer. Surgery remains the treatment of choice in all appropriate patients with invasive and locoregional esophageal cancer, although multimodality therapy is now used in most patients with stage II or stage III disease. CONCLUSION: Outcomes for esophagectomy have been dominated by concerns regarding high mortality and morbidity; however, mortality rates associated with esophageal resection have dramatically decreased, especially in high-volume specialty centers. This manuscript highlights some of the evolutionary issues associated with staging and endoscopic and surgical treatments of Barrett's and esophageal cancer.
Authors: John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas W Rice; David P Mason; Sudish C Murthy; Gregory Zuccaro; David J Adelstein; Lisa A Rybicki; Eugene H Blackstone Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2007-01-09 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Joseph Anton Galanko; Michael Owen Meyers; Richard Harry Feins; Timothy Michael Farrell Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Mark F Berry; B Zane Atkins; Betty C Tong; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark W Onaitis Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Thomas Semlitsch; Klaus Jeitler; Rainer Schoefl; Karl Horvath; Nicole Pignitter; Franz Harnoncourt; Andrea Siebenhofer Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Pieter van Hagen; Manon C W Spaander; Ate van der Gaast; Caroline M van Rij; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot; Bas P L Wijnhoven Journal: Int J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Ryan Gregory Spurrier; Allison L Speer; Xiaogang Hou; Wael N El-Nachef; Tracy C Grikscheit Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Michael Kranzfelder; Ralf Gertler; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Helmut Friess; Marcus Feith Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-05-25 Impact factor: 4.584