Literature DB >> 20506037

Inconsistent mammography perceptions and practices among women at risk of breast cancer following a pediatric malignancy: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Stephanie M Smith1, Jennifer S Ford, William Rakowski, Chaya S Moskowitz, Lisa Diller, Melissa M Hudson, Ann C Mertens, Annette L Stanton, Tara O Henderson, Wendy M Leisenring, Leslie L Robison, Kevin C Oeffinger.   

Abstract

Women treated with chest radiation for a pediatric cancer have low mammography screening rates despite their high risk for breast cancer. This study characterized the relationship between perceptions of mammography and screening practices. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 523 women in North America who were treated with chest radiation before 21 years of age. Women with inconsistent mammography perceptions and practices were identified using the Pros and Cons of Mammography for perceptions and Transtheoretical Model stages of adoption for prior and intended screening practices. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to identify barriers to and facilitators of screening among women with positive and negative perceptions. Nearly one-third of the cohort had inconsistent perceptions and practices: 37.4% had positive perceptions and were not having mammograms; 27.6% had negative/neutral perceptions and were having mammograms. Regardless of perceptions, a recent physician's recommendation for mammography, age ≥ 40, and interest in routine health care were universally associated with mammography practices. For women with positive perceptions and a physician's recommendation, barriers to screening included high acceptance coping, low active-planning coping, and high internal health locus of control. For women with negative perceptions, acknowledging the importance of asymptomatic screening was associated with mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20506037      PMCID: PMC2941535          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-010-9587-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  42 in total

1.  Prospective association between distress and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Kathryn L Taylor; Kristen S Willard
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-04

2.  Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography.

Authors:  W Rakowski; C E Dube; B H Marcus; J O Prochaska; W F Velicer; D B Abrams
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 3.  Common psychosocial factors underlying breast cancer screening and breast cancer treatment adherence: a conceptual review and synthesis.

Authors:  Carol Magai; Nathan Consedine; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 4.  Pediatric cancer survivorship research: experience of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Wendy M Leisenring; Ann C Mertens; Gregory T Armstrong; Marilyn A Stovall; Joseph P Neglia; Jennifer Q Lanctot; John D Boice; John A Whitton; Yutaka Yasui
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography.

Authors:  W Rakowski; M R Andersen; A M Stoddard; N Urban; B K Rimer; D S Lane; S A Fox; M E Costanza
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Second cancers following pediatric Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  S L Wolden; K R Lamborn; S F Cleary; D J Tate; S S Donaldson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Distress, personality, and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  M D Schwartz; K L Taylor; K S Willard; J E Siegel; R M Lamdan; K Moran
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  A comparative study of the long term psychosocial functioning of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors treated by intrathecal methotrexate with or without cranial radiation.

Authors:  J M Hill; A B Kornblith; D Jones; A Freeman; J F Holland; A S Glicksman; J M Boyett; B Lenherr; M L Brecher; R Dubowy; F Kung; H Maurer; J C Holland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The years after: a concept of the psychological integration of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Alain Di Gallo; Felix Amsler; Charlotte Gwerder; Dieter Bürgin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Study design and cohort characteristics of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a multi-institutional collaborative project.

Authors:  Leslie L Robison; Ann C Mertens; John D Boice; Norman E Breslow; Sarah S Donaldson; Daniel M Green; Frederic P Li; Anna T Meadows; John J Mulvihill; Joseph P Neglia; Mark E Nesbit; Roger J Packer; John D Potter; Charles A Sklar; Malcolm A Smith; Marilyn Stovall; Louise C Strong; Yutaka Yasui; Lonnie K Zeltzer
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  2002-04
View more
  9 in total

1.  Predictors of colorectal cancer surveillance among survivors of childhood cancer treated with radiation: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Casey L Daniel; Connie L Kohler; Kayla L Stratton; Kevin C Oeffinger; Wendy M Leisenring; John W Waterbor; Kimberly F Whelan; Gregory T Armstrong; Tara O Henderson; Kevin R Krull; Leslie L Robison; Paul C Nathan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Effect of Population Socioeconomic and Health System Factors on Medical Care of Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Deirdre A Caplin; Ken R Smith; Kirsten K Ness; Heidi A Hanson; Stephanie M Smith; Paul C Nathan; Melissa M Hudson; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.223

Review 3.  Interventions to improve adherence to surveillance guidelines in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Veda Zabih; Alyssa Kahane; Natalya E O'Neill; Noah Ivers; Paul C Nathan
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Promoting Breast Cancer Surveillance: The EMPOWER Study, a Randomized Clinical Trial in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Jennifer S Ford; Chaya S Moskowitz; Joanne F Chou; Tara O Henderson; Melissa M Hudson; Lisa Diller; Aaron McDonald; James Ford; Nidha Z Mubdi; Dayton Rinehart; Christopher Vukadinovich; Todd M Gibson; Nassim Anderson; Elena B Elkin; Kathleen Garrett; Margaret Rebull; Wendy Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Health care utilization, lifestyle, and emotional factors and mammography practices in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Chaya S Moskowitz; Jennifer S Ford; Tara O Henderson; A Lindsay Frazier; Lisa R Diller; Melissa M Hudson; Annette L Stanton; Joanne F Chou; Stephanie Smith; Wendy M Leisenring; Ann C Mertens; Cheryl L Cox; Paul C Nathan; Kevin R Krull; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Factors associated with childhood cancer survivors' knowledge about their diagnosis, treatment, and risk for late effects.

Authors:  Iqra A Syed; Anne F Klassen; Ronald Barr; Rebecca Wang; David Dix; Marion Nelson; Zahava R S Rosenberg-Yunger; Paul C Nathan
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Childhood cancer survivors face markedly worse overall survival after diagnosis with breast cancer, melanoma, or colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kevin T Lynch; William J Kane; Mark A Fleming; Raj P Desai; Shayna L Showalter; Craig L Slingluff; Daniel E Levin; Traci L Hedrick
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.885

8.  Costs of diagnostic and preoperative workup with and without breast MRI in older women with a breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Anna N A Tosteson; Julie Weiss; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Rebecca A Hubbard; Louise M Henderson; Karla Kerlikowske; Martha E Goodrich; Cristina O'Donoghue; Karen J Wernli; Wendy B DeMartini; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Inconsistent Mammography Perceptions and Practice among Women of Over 40 Years in Iran

Authors:  Fatemeh Pourhaji; Fazlollah Ghofranipour
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-05-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.