Literature DB >> 24456231

Distribution and origin of groundwater methane in the Wattenberg oil and gas field of northern Colorado.

Huishu Li1, Kenneth H Carlson.   

Abstract

Public concerns over potential environmental contamination associated with oil and gas well drilling and fracturing in the Wattenberg field in northeast Colorado are increasing. One of the issues of concern is the migration of oil, gas, or produced water to a groundwater aquifer resulting in contamination of drinking water. Since methane is the major component of natural gas and it can be dissolved and transported with groundwater, stray gas in aquifers has elicited attention. The initial step toward understanding the environmental impacts of oil and gas activities, such as well drilling and fracturing, is to determine the occurrence, where it is and where it came from. In this study, groundwater methane data that has been collected in response to a relatively new regulation in Colorado is analyzed. Dissolved methane was detected in 78% of groundwater wells with an average concentration of 4.0 mg/L and a range of 0-37.1 mg/L. Greater than 95% of the methane found in groundwater wells was classified as having a microbial origin, and there was minimal overlap between the C and H isotopic characterization of the produced gas and dissolved methane measured in the aquifer. Neither density of oil/gas wells nor distance to oil/gas wells had a significant impact on methane concentration suggesting other important factors were influencing methane generation and distribution. Thermogenic methane was detected in two aquifer wells indicating a potential contamination pathway from the producing formation, but microbial-origin gas was by far the predominant source of dissolved methane in the Wattenberg field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24456231     DOI: 10.1021/es404668b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

Review 1.  Impact of upstream oil extraction and environmental public health: A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Jill E Johnston; Esther Lim; Hannah Roh
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 2.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  High winter ozone pollution from carbonyl photolysis in an oil and gas basin.

Authors:  Peter M Edwards; Steven S Brown; James M Roberts; Ravan Ahmadov; Robert M Banta; Joost A deGouw; William P Dubé; Robert A Field; James H Flynn; Jessica B Gilman; Martin Graus; Detlev Helmig; Abigail Koss; Andrew O Langford; Barry L Lefer; Brian M Lerner; Rui Li; Shao-Meng Li; Stuart A McKeen; Shane M Murphy; David D Parrish; Christoph J Senff; Jeffrey Soltis; Jochen Stutz; Colm Sweeney; Chelsea R Thompson; Michael K Trainer; Catalina Tsai; Patrick R Veres; Rebecca A Washenfelder; Carsten Warneke; Robert J Wild; Cora J Young; Bin Yuan; Robert Zamora
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Groundwater methane in relation to oil and gas development and shallow coal seams in the Denver-Julesburg Basin of Colorado.

Authors:  Owen A Sherwood; Jessica D Rogers; Greg Lackey; Troy L Burke; Stephen G Osborn; Joseph N Ryan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Colorado Water Watch: real-time groundwater monitoring for possible contamination from oil and gas activities.

Authors:  Ji-Hee Son; Asma Hanif; Ashwin Dhanasekar; Kenneth H Carlson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Oil and Natural Gas Operations: Potential Environmental Contamination and Recommendations to Assess Complex Environmental Mixtures.

Authors:  Christopher D Kassotis; Donald E Tillitt; Chung-Ho Lin; Jane A McElroy; Susan C Nagel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Hazard Ranking Methodology for Assessing Health Impacts of Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Production: The Maryland Case Study.

Authors:  Meleah D Boyle; Devon C Payne-Sturges; Thurka Sangaramoorthy; Sacoby Wilson; Keeve E Nachman; Kelsey Babik; Christian C Jenkins; Joshua Trowell; Donald K Milton; Amir Sapkota
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.