Literature DB >> 32385535

Critical evaluation of human health risks due to hydraulic fracturing in natural gas and petroleum production.

Klaus-Michael Wollin1, G Damm2, H Foth3, A Freyberger4, T Gebel5, A Mangerich6, U Gundert-Remy7, F Partosch8, C Röhl9, T Schupp10, Jan G Hengstler11.   

Abstract

The use of hydraulic fracturing (HF) to extract oil and natural gas has increased, along with intensive discussions on the associated risks to human health. Three technical processes should be differentiated when evaluating human health risks, namely (1) drilling of the borehole, (2) hydraulic stimulation, and (3) gas or oil production. During the drilling phase, emissions such as NOx, NMVOCs (non-methane volatile organic compounds) as precursors for tropospheric ozone formation, and SOx have been shown to be higher compared to the subsequent phases. In relation to hydraulic stimulation, the toxicity of frac fluids is of relevance. More than 1100 compounds have been identified as components. A trend is to use fewer, less hazardous and more biodegradable substances; however, the use of hydrocarbons, such as kerosene and diesel, is still allowed in the USA. Methane in drinking water is of low toxicological relevance but may indicate inadequate integrity of the gas well. There is a great concern regarding the contamination of ground- and surface water during the production phase. Water that flows to the surface from oil and gas wells, so-called 'produced water', represents a mixture of flow-back, the injected frac fluid returning to the surface, and the reservoir water present in natural oil and gas deposits. Among numerous hazardous compounds, produced water may contain bromide, arsenic, strontium, mercury, barium, radioactive isotopes and organic compounds, particularly benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX). The sewage outflow, even from specialized treatment plants, may still contain critical concentrations of barium, strontium and arsenic. Evidence suggests that the quality of groundwater and surface water may be compromised by disposal of produced water. Particularly critical is the use of produced water for watering of agricultural areas, where persistent compounds may accumulate. Air contamination can occur as a result of several HF-associated activities. In addition to BTEX, 20 HF-associated air contaminants are group 1A or 1B carcinogens according to the IARC. In the U.S., oil and gas production (including conventional production) represents the second largest source of anthropogenic methane emissions. High-quality epidemiological studies are required, especially in light of recent observations of an association between childhood leukemia and multiple myeloma in the neighborhood of oil and gas production sites. In conclusion, (1) strong evidence supports the conclusion that frac fluids can lead to local environmental contamination; (2) while changes in the chemical composition of soil, water and air are likely to occur, the increased levels are still often below threshold values for safety; (3) point source pollution due to poor maintenance of wells and pipelines can be monitored and remedied; (4) risk assessment should be based on both hazard and exposure evaluation; (5) while the concentrations of frac fluid chemicals are low, some are known carcinogens; therefore, thorough, well-designed studies are needed to assess the risk to human health with high certainty; (6) HF can represent a health risk via long-lasting contamination of soil and water, when strict safety measures are not rigorously applied.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental pollution; Epidemiological studies; Human health risk assessment; Hydraulic fracturing; Unconventional natural gas and oil production

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32385535      PMCID: PMC7225182          DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02758-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  94 in total

1.  Statistical evaluation of the impact of shale gas activities on ozone pollution in North Texas.

Authors:  Mahdi Ahmadi; Kuruvilla John
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Evaluation of impact of shale gas operations in the Barnett Shale region on volatile organic compounds in air and potential human health risks.

Authors:  A G Bunch; C S Perry; L Abraham; D S Wikoff; J A Tachovsky; J G Hixon; J D Urban; M A Harris; L C Haws
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Well water contamination in a rural community in southwestern Pennsylvania near unconventional shale gas extraction.

Authors:  Shyama K Alawattegama; Tetiana Kondratyuk; Renee Krynock; Matthew Bricker; Jennifer K Rutter; Daniel J Bain; John F Stolz
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.269

Review 4.  Emissions from oil and gas operations in the United States and their air quality implications.

Authors:  David T Allen
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.235

Review 5.  Potential public health hazards, exposures and health effects from unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  John L Adgate; Bernard D Goldstein; Lisa M McKenzie
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 6.  Understanding exposure from natural gas drilling puts current air standards to the test.

Authors:  David Brown; Beth Weinberger; Celia Lewis; Heather Bonaparte
Journal:  Rev Environ Health       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.458

7.  Gestational exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in Northeastern British Columbia, Canada: A pilot study.

Authors:  Élyse Caron-Beaudoin; Naomi Valter; Jonathan Chevrier; Pierre Ayotte; Katherine Frohlich; Marc-André Verner
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  Spatial and temporal correlation of water quality parameters of produced waters from devonian-age shale following hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Elise Barbot; Natasa S Vidic; Kelvin B Gregory; Radisav D Vidic
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 9.  Systematic review of the association between oil and natural gas extraction processes and human reproduction.

Authors:  Victoria D Balise; Chun-Xia Meng; Jennifer N Cornelius-Green; Christopher D Kassotis; Rana Kennedy; Susan C Nagel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  A Systematic Review of the Epidemiologic Literature Assessing Health Outcomes in Populations Living near Oil and Natural Gas Operations: Study Quality and Future Recommendations.

Authors:  Alison M Bamber; Stephanie H Hasanali; Anil S Nair; Sharon M Watkins; Daniel I Vigil; Michael Van Dyke; Tami S McMullin; Kristy Richardson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  3 in total

1.  Regional Scale Assessment of Shallow Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination from Unconventional Hydrocarbon Extraction.

Authors:  Mario A Soriano; Nicole C Deziel; James E Saiers
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 11.357

2.  "That's Where Our Income Comes From": Women's Perceptions of Links Between Reproductive Struggles and Hydraulic Fracturing.

Authors:  Mollie K Murphy; Mehmet Soyer; Sebahattin Ziyanak; Taya Godfrey
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-05-13

3.  Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Impacts of Hurricane Florence on Criteria Air Pollutants and Air Toxics in Eastern North Carolina.

Authors:  Sharmila Bhandari; Gaston Casillas; Noor A Aly; Rui Zhu; Galen Newman; Fred A Wright; Anthony Miller; Gabriela Adler; Ivan Rusyn; Weihsueh A Chiu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.