Literature DB >> 26476065

Occurrence and origin of methane in groundwater in Alberta (Canada): Gas geochemical and isotopic approaches.

P Humez1, B Mayer2, J Ing2, M Nightingale2, V Becker2, A Kingston2, O Akbilgic3, S Taylor2.   

Abstract

To assess potential future impacts on shallow aquifers by leakage of natural gas from unconventional energy resource development it is essential to establish a reliable baseline. Occurrence of methane in shallow groundwater in Alberta between 2006 and 2014 was assessed and was ubiquitous in 186 sampled monitoring wells. Free and dissolved gas sampling and measurement approaches yielded comparable results with low methane concentrations in shallow groundwater, but in 28 samples from 21 wells methane exceeded 10mg/L in dissolved gas and 300,000 ppmv in free gas. Methane concentrations in free and dissolved gas samples were found to increase with well depth and were especially elevated in groundwater obtained from aquifers containing coal seams and shale units. Carbon isotope ratios of methane averaged -69.7 ± 11.1‰ (n=63) in free gas and -65.6 ± 8.9‰ (n=26) in dissolved gas. δ(13)C values were not found to vary with well depth or lithology indicating that methane in Alberta groundwater was derived from a similar source. The low δ(13)C values in concert with average δ(2)HCH4 values of -289 ± 44‰ (n=45) suggest that most methane was of biogenic origin predominantly generated via CO2 reduction. This interpretation is confirmed by dryness parameters typically >500 due to only small amounts of ethane and a lack of propane in most samples. Comparison with mud gas profile carbon isotope data revealed that methane in the investigated shallow groundwater in Alberta is isotopically similar to hydrocarbon gases found in 100-250 meter depths in the WCSB and is currently not sourced from thermogenic hydrocarbon occurrences in deeper portions of the basin. The chemical and isotopic data for methane gas samples obtained from Alberta groundwater provide an excellent baseline against which potential future impact of deeper stray gases on shallow aquifers can be assessed.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alberta; Gas geochemistry; Groundwater monitoring; Methane; Stable isotopes; Statistical analysis

Year:  2015        PMID: 26476065     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

1.  Groundwater methane in relation to oil and gas development and shallow coal seams in the Denver-Julesburg Basin of Colorado.

Authors:  Owen A Sherwood; Jessica D Rogers; Greg Lackey; Troy L Burke; Stephen G Osborn; Joseph N Ryan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Can groundwater sampling techniques used in monitoring wells influence methane concentrations and isotopes?

Authors:  Christine Rivard; Geneviève Bordeleau; Denis Lavoie; René Lefebvre; Xavier Malet
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Monitoring concentration and isotopic composition of methane in groundwater in the Utica Shale hydraulic fracturing region of Ohio.

Authors:  E Claire Botner; Amy Townsend-Small; David B Nash; Xiaomei Xu; Arndt Schimmelmann; Joshua H Miller
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Geochemical indicators of the origins and evolution of methane in groundwater: Gippsland Basin, Australia.

Authors:  Matthew Currell; Dominic Banfield; Ian Cartwright; Dioni I Cendón
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Fate and Transport of Shale-derived, Biogenic Methane.

Authors:  M Jim Hendry; Erin E Schmeling; S Lee Barbour; M Huang; Scott O C Mundle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Methane oxidation and methylotroph population dynamics in groundwater mesocosms.

Authors:  Olukayode Kuloyo; S Emil Ruff; Aaron Cahill; Liam Connors; Jackie K Zorz; Isabella Hrabe de Angelis; Michael Nightingale; Bernhard Mayer; Marc Strous
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 5.491

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.