Literature DB >> 20545591

Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best-worst scaling.

Terry N Flynn1.   

Abstract

There is increased interest in the use of best-worst scaling (BWS) as a method of preference elicitation in health. However, the method is undergoing rapid development in several fields, making dissemination of new insights challenging. Furthermore, there are two types of BWS that have hitherto received little interest in health, but that are uniquely placed to address certain issues. This article offers an update of the state of play of BWS, presents original research to illustrate new methods of analysis and introduces to health researchers some issues on the research frontier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20545591     DOI: 10.1586/erp.10.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  59 in total

1.  Using best-worst scaling choice experiments to measure public perceptions and preferences for healthcare reform in australia.

Authors:  Jordan J Louviere; Terry N Flynn
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Why should regulators consider using patient preferences in benefit-risk assessment?

Authors:  Janine A van Til; Maarten J Ijzerman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Systematic Review of Patients' and Parents' Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care.

Authors:  Nicole K Schatz; Gregory A Fabiano; Charles E Cunningham; Susan dosReis; Daniel A Waschbusch; Stephanie Jerome; Kellina Lupas; Karen L Morris
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Exploring variation in parental worries about HPV vaccination: a latent-class analysis.

Authors:  Melissa B Gilkey; Divya Mohan; Ellen M Janssen; Annie-Laurie McRee; Melanie L Kornides; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Health Preference Research: An Overview.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Emily Lancsar; Axel C Mühlbacher; Derek S Brown; Jan Ostermann
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Using Best-Worst Scaling to Understand Patient Priorities: A Case Example of Papanicolaou Tests for Homeless Women.

Authors:  Eve Wittenberg; Monica Bharel; John F P Bridges; Zachary Ward; Linda Weinreb
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Measuring the Preferences of Homeless Women for Cervical Cancer Screening Interventions: Development of a Best-Worst Scaling Survey.

Authors:  Eve Wittenberg; Monica Bharel; Adrianna Saada; Emely Santiago; John F P Bridges; Linda Weinreb
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Parents' Views on the Best and Worst Reasons for Guideline-Consistent HPV Vaccination.

Authors:  Melissa B Gilkey; Mo Zhou; Annie-Laurie McRee; Melanie L Kornides; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Prioritizing Parental Worry Associated with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Using Best-Worst Scaling.

Authors:  Holly Landrum Peay; I L Hollin; J F P Bridges
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments.

Authors:  Franziska Severin; Jörg Schmidtke; Axel Mühlbacher; Wolf H Rogowski
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.