Literature DB >> 16707175

Best--worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it.

Terry N Flynn1, Jordan J Louviere, Tim J Peters, Joanna Coast.   

Abstract

Statements like "quality of care is more highly valued than waiting time" can neither be supported nor refuted by comparisons of utility parameters from a traditional discrete choice experiment (DCE). Best--worst scaling can overcome this problem because it asks respondents to perform a different choice task. However, whilst the nature of the best--worst task is generally understood, there are a number of issues relating to the design and analysis of a best--worst choice experiment that require further exposition. This paper illustrates how to aggregate and analyse such data and using a quality of life pilot study demonstrates how richer insights can be drawn by the use of best--worst tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16707175     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  147 in total

1.  Using Best-Worst Scaling to Measure Caregiver Preferences for Managing their Child's ADHD: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Susan dosReis; Xinyi Ng; Emily Frosch; Gloria Reeves; Charles Cunningham; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Using best-worst scaling choice experiments to measure public perceptions and preferences for healthcare reform in australia.

Authors:  Jordan J Louviere; Terry N Flynn
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Comparison of health state utility values derived using time trade-off, rank and discrete choice data anchored on the full health-dead scale.

Authors:  John Brazier; Donna Rowen; Yaling Yang; Aki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-09-30

4.  Using conjoint analysis and choice experiments to estimate QALY values: issues to consider.

Authors:  Terry N Flynn
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline Vass; Ewan Gray; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-06

6.  Analysis of patients' preferences: direct assessment and discrete-choice experiment in therapy of adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Axel C Mühlbacher; Matthias Nübling
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  A best-worst scaling experiment to prioritize caregiver concerns about ADHD medication for children.

Authors:  Melissa Ross; John F P Bridges; Xinyi Ng; Lauren D Wagner; Emily Frosch; Gloria Reeves; Susan dosReis
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  The role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the choice of practice establishment: a stated preference study of young physicians in Germany.

Authors:  Oliver H Günther; Beate Kürstein; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Quality versus quantity in end-of-life choices of cancer patients and support persons: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Amy Waller; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Scott D Brown; Laura Wall; Justin Walsh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Prioritizing Parental Worry Associated with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Using Best-Worst Scaling.

Authors:  Holly Landrum Peay; I L Hollin; J F P Bridges
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.