Hematologic measures such as hematocrit and white blood cell (WBC) count are heritable and clinically relevant. We analyzed erythrocyte and WBC phenotypes in 52,531 individuals (37,775 of European ancestry, 11,589 African Americans, and 3,167 Hispanic Americans) from 16 population-based cohorts with Illumina HumanExome BeadChip genotypes. We then performed replication analyses of new discoveries in 18,018 European-American women and 5,261 Han Chinese. We identified and replicated four new erythrocyte trait-locus associations (CEP89, SHROOM3, FADS2, and APOE) and six new WBC loci for neutrophil count (S1PR4), monocyte count (BTBD8, NLRP12, and IL17RA), eosinophil count (IRF1), and total WBC count (MYB). The association of a rare missense variant in S1PR4 supports the role of sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling in leukocyte trafficking and circulating neutrophil counts. Loss-of-function experiments for S1pr4 in mouse and s1pr4 in zebrafish demonstrated phenotypes consistent with the association observed in humans and altered kinetics of neutrophil recruitment and resolution in response to tissue injury.
Hematologic measures such as hematocrit and white blood cell (WBC) count are heritable and clinically relevant. We analyzed erythrocyte and WBC phenotypes in 52,531 individuals (37,775 of European ancestry, 11,589 African Americans, and 3,167 Hispanic Americans) from 16 population-based cohorts with Illumina HumanExome BeadChip genotypes. We then performed replication analyses of new discoveries in 18,018 European-American women and 5,261 Han Chinese. We identified and replicated four new erythrocyte trait-locus associations (CEP89, SHROOM3, FADS2, and APOE) and six new WBC loci for neutrophil count (S1PR4), monocyte count (BTBD8, NLRP12, and IL17RA), eosinophil count (IRF1), and total WBC count (MYB). The association of a rare missense variant in S1PR4 supports the role of sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling in leukocyte trafficking and circulating neutrophil counts. Loss-of-function experiments for S1pr4 in mouse and s1pr4 in zebrafish demonstrated phenotypes consistent with the association observed in humans and altered kinetics of neutrophil recruitment and resolution in response to tissue injury.
Erythrocyte and leukocyte blood counts are heritable traits (estimated heritability 0.40–0.90[1-3] and 0.14–0.40, respectively[4]) that reflect core physiologic functions of oxygen-carrying capacity and anti-microbial activity. Peripheral blood cell counts are commonly measured in the clinical setting to diagnose and monitor therapy of many acute and chronic conditions, such as infection or anemia. Abnormalities in these clinical measures often reflect primary hematologic disease, blood loss or inflammation. Inter-individual differences in erythrocyte traits, total WBC, and neutrophil counts have been associated with risk of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality.[5-7]Previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have defined over 100 loci influencing erythrocyte traits[8-12] and leukocyte counts.[8,13,14] However, few studies have systematically evaluated the contribution of coding variation, particularly variants at low frequency in the general population.[15,16] Recently completed exome sequencing in diverse populations has led to international collaboration and creation of a genome-wide catalog of low frequency coding variants. We undertook a large-scale study of erythrocyte and leukocyte traits in up to 52,531 individuals of European, African and Hispanic ancestry to evaluate the impact of both low-frequency and common variants assayed by the Illumina HumanExome BeadChip, also referred to as the exome chip.
Results
Study Samples
In the discovery stage, we analyzed erythrocyte traits (hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), red cell distribution width (RDW), and red blood cell count (RBC)) and leukocyte traits (total WBC count and absolute neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil, and basophil counts) (Supplementary Table 1) in 52,531 individuals, including 37,775 with European ancestry (EA), 11,589 African Americans (AA), and 3,167 white Hispanics (HA) sampled from 16 population-based cohorts. Sample sizes per trait analyzed in each cohort are provided in Supplementary Table 2. The traits followed expected distributions, and characteristics of the study participants, including age, sex and trait summaries, are presented in Supplementary Table 3. Descriptions of each cohort are provided in the Supplementary Note.
Single variant and gene-based meta-analyses
In single variant analyses, we did not observe significant inflation of the meta-analysis p-values (Supplementary Table 4). A total of 104 unique locus-trait associations exceeded the Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold (p<4×10−7; Supplementary Table 5). These included 49 independent loci associated with erythrocyte traits and 22 loci associated with leukocyte traits (Supplementary Table 6). Many of these were single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) well-established to be associated with hematologic traits (see Supplementary Note), thus confirming the validity of the exome chip. Novel findings reaching study-wide significance (p<4×10−7; n=9 for erythrocytes; n=10 for leukocytes) are listed in Table 1 and were carried forward to replication in an independent sample. Of these, 4 novel trait-locus associations for erythrocyte traits (SHROOM, CEP89, and APOE were study-wide significant, p<0.003; FADS2 was only nominally significant, p=0.02) and 6 novel trait-locus associations for WBC traits (BTBD8, MYB/HBS1L, S1PR4, and IL17RA were study-wide significant, p<0.003; IRF1 and NLRP12 were only nominally significant, p<0.05) were replicated in an independent set of European American samples from WHI (Supplementary Table 7).
Table 1
Novel RBC (a) and WBC (b) discovered associations in the discovery samples, with replication results
(a)Trait
rsID
Chr
Position
Gene
Function
EA+AA+HAbeta
EA+AA+HAp-value
EA / AA / HA−log10(p)
EA / AA / HAMAFs
WHI EABeta
WHI EAp-value
(a) Red Blood Cell traits
Hct
rs587404
1
39,908,506
MACF1
p.Ala6577Thr
−0.107
2.9×10−7
4.6 / 2.5 / 0.3
0.298 / 0.462 / 0.349
0.009
0.79
MCV
rs2229032
3
142,178,144
ATR
p.Arg2425Gln
−0.003
1.1×10−7
6.4 / 0.1 / 1.5
0.160 / 0.077 / 0.110
0.000
0.98
Hct
rs13146355
4
77,412,140
SHROOM3
intronic
0.105
4.1×10−7
4.2 / 2.0 / 2.6
0.444 / 0.150 / 0.317
0.144
4.7×10−6
MCV
rs853678
6
28,297,313
ZSCAN31
p.Thr50Ser
−0.003
8.1×10−8
8.3 / 0.6 / 0.3
0.134 / 0.351 / 0.220
0.001
0.81
MCH
rs4909444
8
139,701,209
COL22A1
p.Ala938Asp
−0.003
2.7×10−7
5.0 / 2.0 / 0.9
0.328 / 0.265 / 0.310
0.002
0.22
RBC
rs1535
11
61,597,972
FADS2
intronic
0.020
3.1×10−9
7.3 / 0.8 / 1.3
0.344 / 0.149 / 0.381
0.028
0.02
MCV
rs2748427
17
76,121,864
TMC6
p.Trp125Arg
−0.002
1.6×10−5
6.9 / 2.0 / 1.4
0.210 / 0.468 / 0.291
-0.001
0.96
Hb
rs4805834
19
33,453,659
CEP89
intronic
−0.059
2.2×10−8
6.1 / 2.6 / 0.7
0.145 / 0.025 / 0.080
−0.052
4.0×10−4
RDW
rs7412
19
45,412,079
APOE
p.Arg202Cys
0.009
5.6×10−8
6.1 / 1.7 / -
0.068 / 0.111 / -
0.012
0.003
(b) White Blood Cell traits
Monocytes
rs34856868
1
92,554,283
BTBD8
p.Val60Ile
0.079
1.2×10−12
10.7 / 1.0 / 1.0
0.029 / 0.005 / 0.015
0.118
1.2×10−5
Total WBC
rs147630966
3
158,970,516
IQCJ
p.Asn25Lys
0.082
1.8×10−7
3.4 / 5.5 / 0.1
0.0004 / 0.013 / 0.006
0.122
0.35
Total WBC
rs116085696
4
119,745,814
SEC24D
p.Gly70Val
0.095
2.4×10−7
- / 6.7 / 0.2
- / 0.011 / 0.003
–
–
Eosinophils
rs12521868
5
131,784,393
IRF1
intronic
−0.008
7.5×10−8
8.3 / 1.0 / 1.2
0.415 / 0.090 / 0.280
−0.009
0.03
Total WBC
rs7776054
6
135,418,916
MYB/HBS1L
intergenic
−0.010
6.1×10−7
7.1 / 0.1 / 0.2
0.262 / 0.217 / 0.195
−0.011
1.0×10−4
Eosinophils
rs1342326
9
6,190,076
IL33
intergenic
0.009
1.5×10−7
8.2 / 0.4 / 0.3
0.164 / 0.349 / 0.206
−0.009
0.10
Lymphocytes
rs3744064
17
75,211,208
SEC14L1
UTR3
0.004
0.49
0.3 / 0.3 / 8.1
0.030 / 0.006 / 0.026
−0.024
0.44
Total WBC
rs3746072
19
3,179,884
S1PR4
p.Arg365Leu
−0.062
1.5×10−7
5.4 / 0.6 / 1.7
0.006 / 0.003 / 0.010
−0.056
0.001
Monocytes
rs34436714
19
54,327,313
NLRP12
p.Gly39Val
−0.022
1.0×10−7
5.9 / 0.5 / 1.7
0.217 / 0.370 / 0.263
−0.026
0.02
Monocytes
rs149771513
22
17,588,658
IL17RA
p.Asp363Asn
0.284
3.2×10−8
6.7 / 1.4 / 0.3
0.001 / 0.0002 / 0.0002
−0.073
0.82
Bold indicates a significant association in either the discovery (p<5×10−7) or replication samples (p<0.003); indicates nominal significance (p<0.05)
Novel, replicated associations with erythrocyte traits
All 4 novel, replicated erythrocyte associations are common SNPs present on the exome chip because of prior associations with non-hematologic phenotypes as listed in the NHGRI GWAS catalog. Two common intronic SNPs previously associated with renal function (SHROOM3/rs13146355 and CEP89/rs4805834) were associated with both Hb and Hct. The minor allele of SHROOM3/rs13146355-A (previously associated with both lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)[17] and higher serum magnesium[18]) was associated with significantly higher Hb and Hct and nominally higher RBC count in our discovery and replication cohorts. The minor allele of CEP89/rs4805834-T was associated with lower Hb and Hct and higher eGFR.[19] The observed directions of effect on Hb and Hct for both CEP89/rs4805834 and SHROOM3/rs13146355 are opposite of that expected based on the known relationship between lower eGFR and anemia. Conditional analyses performed in a subset of our cohorts demonstrated that the effect of either CEP89/rs4805834 or SHROOM3/rs13146355 on Hb and Hct was independent of eGFR (see Supplementary Note for more detail).An intronic SNP of the fatty acid desaturase gene FADS2 (rs1535) previously associated with transferrin levels[20] and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) levels[21] was associated with RBC count. Finally, we identified an association between increased RDW and the SNP encoding the canonical APOE-ɛ2 variant rs7412, which is known to be associated with cholesterol[22-25] and inversely associated with dementia.[26,27] Additional adjustment for LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglyceride levels did not attenuate the APOE-ɛ2/RDW association in the ARIC study. A tag for the APOE-ɛ4 allele was present on the exome chip, but had no association with either LDL-cholesterol or RDW independent of APOE-ɛ2 (Supplementary Note).In gene-based tests, several loci were significantly associated with erythrocyte traits in the discovery sample (Table 2; Supplementary Table 8). The EPO gene-based association was driven by a single low-frequency missense variant (p.Asp70Asn/rs62483572), confirming the recent association of this variant with lower Hb.[16] Similarly, a single novel variant drove the ITFG3 association (p.Asp534Asn/rs144091859). The HFE and G6PD associations were driven by population-specific common variants identified in prior GWAS that were included in the gene-based test because they are common in one population but absent in another and therefore averaged out to below the minor allele frequency (MAF) <0.05 threshold for inclusion in the trans-ethnic analysis. Significant associations in ANK1, NLRC3, and HBS1L were supported by multiple rare variants (Supplementary Table 9a; Supplementary Note).
Table 2
Top results for gene-based tests in the discovery and replication samples
Red Blood Cell Traits
T5Count p-value
SKATwu5 p-value
Replication p-value*
Trait
Gene
EA+AA+HA
EA
AA
HA
EA+AA+HA
EA
AA
HA
WHI EA Hb
WHI EA Hct
Hb
EPO
0.0024
9.9E-04
0.72
0.90
1.0E-08
2.3E-08
0.17
0.30
0.0001
6.4E-05
Hb, Hct, MCH, MCHC, MCV
HFE
4.7E-31
0.18
0.08
0.89
2.2E-23
0.06
0.03
0.92
N/A
N/A
Hb, Hct, MCH, MCV, RBC
G6PD
2.6E-19
0.02
0.32
0.07
1.6E-19
0.08
0.25
0.07
N/A
N/A
MCH
NLRC3
0.0028
0.38
0.44
4E-04
0.06
0.77
0.87
2.5E-07
0.96
0.96
MCH, MCHC, MCV, RBC
ITFG3
1.3E-04
0.95
9.9E-17
0.49
5.2E-26
0.85
1.1E-40
8.0E-04
0.095
0.94
MCHC
ANK1
5.7E-04
2.5E-06
0.39
0.56
1.3E-10
1.1E-09
0.48
0.42
0.70
0.92
MCV
HBS1L
0.01
0.001
0.62
0.68
6.1E-07
1.5E-06
0.44
0.94
0.84
0.71
Multiple associations in DARC, HFE and G6PD with Hb and Hct which were previously known and also seen in the single variant analyses were not evaluated.
Novel, replicated leukocyte associations
We discovered and replicated 6 novel WBC trait-locus associations. In the single-variant analysis, we identified a single missense variant in the type 4 sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR4), p.Arg365Leu/rs3746072, that was associated with lower total WBC (p=1.5×10−7) and lower neutrophil counts (p=3.4×10−7) (Supplementary Figure 1). The association was consistent across cohorts (Figure 1) and validated in both replication samples (WHI EA women p=0.001; PUUMA Han Chinese p=0.003; p-metadiscovery+replication=5×10−12) (Supplementary Table 7). The variant is rare (MAFmeta=0.006) and not in linkage disequilibrium with variants in the region (Supplementary Figure 1). In both discovery and replication analyses, p.Arg365Leu was the only variant contributing to the significant gene-based association. Neutrophil counts were approximately 10% lower in the p.Arg365Leu minor allele carriers (Figure 2). The S1PR4 p.Arg365Leu amino acid substitution is located in the intracellular cytoplasmic tail of S1PR4, is at a conserved site (GERP: 3.94), and is predicted to be “possibly damaging” by PolyPhen-2.[28]
Figure 1
Forest plot of S1PR4 p.Arg365Leu for neutrophil count and total WBCs. Betas and 95% confidence intervals for each contributing study and for each meta-analysis
Figure 2
Distributions of neutrophil counts for carriers and non–carriers of S1PR4 p.Arg365Leu in ARIC.
Two missense variants were associated with lower monocyte count: a low-frequency p.Val60Ile variant in BTBD8 (rs34856868; MAFEA=0.03) and a common p.Gly39Val variant in NLRP12 (rs34436714; MAFEA=0.217). Three common, intergenic variants included on the exome chip as GWAS index SNPs originally associated with non-leukocyte phenotypes were newly associated with WBC traits in our analysis. The common intergenic regulatory variant of HBS1L-MYB (previously associated with erythrocyte and platelet traits) was associated with total WBC count. Common non-coding SNPs in the regions of IL33 and IRF1 previously associated with asthma[29] and other allergic/autoimmune disorders[30-33] were associated with eosinophil count.Gene-based analyses identified an association between low frequency variation in the IL17RA locus and monocyte count (p=6.4×10−7). We confirmed the recently reported multi-variant association between CXCR2 and lower neutrophil count; 6 of the 9 rare CXCR2 missense variants in our analysis had a p-value less than 0.05, with the strongest associations from p.Arg153His (rs55799208; p=2.4×10−5) and p.Arg248Gln (rs61733609; p=6.1×10−5). Several additional single-variant and gene-based associations with WBC traits were observed within the AA or HA discovery samples, but not in the larger EA discovery sample. Three of these associations were driven by low frequency (MAF 0.01–0.05) variants in AAs (IQCJ and SEC24D) or HAs (SEC14L1) (Table 1b and Supplementary Tables 8 and 9b). Further assessment in independent AA or HA samples will be needed to validate these ethnicity-specific associations.
Characterization of variants in previously known GWAS loci
To evaluate whether variants identified in our analysis overlap previously known GWAS results or whether we identified independent associations, we conducted conditional analyses in ARIC, adjusting for previously known variants associated with erythrocyte and leukocyte traits in several regions overlapping the findings in this study (Supplementary Table 10). Specifically, we interrogated any variant that was rare (MAF<5%) and meeting study-wide significance (Supplementary Note).We identified a novel association between a low-frequency variant in ANK1 (p.Ala1462Val/rs34664882; MAFEA=0.029; MAFAA=0.015; MAFHA=0.013) and MCHC that is independent of the original GWAS result (rs4737009; 1000G CEU MAF=0.27; ARIC MAFEA=0.24). We also identified several low-frequency missense variants in the HBA1-HBA2 region on chromosome 16. The most prominent was an AA-specific variant in ITFG3 (p.Asp534Asn) that was associated with several erythrocyte parameters (MCH, MCHC, MCV, RBC count) and is independent of the common GWAS association (see Supplementary Note). Significant associations with the same traits were also seen for rare variants in MRPL28, NARFL, RGS11, TMEM8A, and TPSD1 (see Supplementary Note).
Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis
We used eQTL analysis[34] to determine if newly identified non-coding variants are associated with expression of nearby genes across a range of tissue types (Supplementary Table 11). The most notable eQTL findings were in the FADS2 locus, which was associated with RBC count in our discovery analysis and met a nominal significance level in the replication analysis (p=0.02). In this region, FADS1, FADS2, and FADS3 all showed evidence of strong cis eQTL association to either the index SNP (rs1535) in multiple tissues, including FADS1 (minimum p= 8.0×10−31 in CD19+ B cells) and FADS2 (minimum p= 3.0×10−57 in blood lymphocytes). The S1PR4 p.Arg365Leu variant does not demonstrate an association with expression levels of S1PR4 or any nearby transcript (Supplementary Table 12).Among the novel and independently replicated loci, rs4895441 at the HBS1L-MYB locus showed the expected eQTL association with HBS1L expression in multiple tissues (minimum p=3.1×10−34 in aortic endothelial cells). In the SHROOM3 locus, rs131463 exhibited a weak eQTL association (p=7.3×10−6) with SHROOM3 transcript expression in subcutaneous adipose tissue. In the CEP89 locus, rs4805834 was associated with expression of SLC7A9 in multiple tissue (p=1.9×10−24 in whole blood). The IRF1 SNP, rs12521868, was associated with expression of IRF1 in multiple tissues (p=1.4×10−125 in whole blood).
Pleiotropy in the associated loci
In addition to pleiotropy between our novel findings and the known associations with kidney function (CEP89 and SHROOM3) and with dementia and dyslipidemia (APOE), we also identified variants with pleiotropy across multiple blood cell lineages, most notably for the HBSL1-MYB and SH2B3 loci as well as other subthreshold associations (see Supplementary Note; Supplementary Table 13).
Confirmation of S1PR4 as a causal gene in model systems
The primary hypothesis of our exome chip study was that focused evaluation of coding variation would yield novel genetic associations of rare variants with hematologic traits, and that these variants would be more likely to be functionally relevant owing to the selection of variants for the exome chip. Our study yielded many novel associations, in part due to coverage of noncoding variation included in the exome chip as follow-up of previous GWAS, as is the case for the three novel RBC loci we report here. The association of a rare missense variant in S1PR4 associated with total WBC and neutrophil count was consistent with our a priori hypothesis, and we therefore undertook further follow-up studies of this gene’s functional impact on neutrophil traits in model systems.Using previously generated S1pr4 null mice,[35] we evaluated peripheral circulating blood neutrophil and monocyte counts, bone marrow neutrophil counts, and spleen neutrophil counts in S1pr4−/− mice and S1pr4+/+ littermates. We analyzed 12 mice in each genotype group (total n=24 mice), with equal numbers of males and females in each group, and found the mean percentage of total cells analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) that were Gr1+ CD11b+, marking neutrophils, was 31% lower in S1pr4−/− mice compared to wild-type mice. We repeated the experiment again in an additional 24 mice, again with 12 mice in each genotype group and equal numbers of males and females in each group and saw a similar decrease. Across the 48 mice, both the percentage of white blood cells that were neutrophils (28.0% decrease; p=0.11) and the absolute neutrophil count (54.3% decrease; p=0.03) were lower in S1pr4 mice compared to wild-type mice (Figure 3; Supplementary Figure 2; Supplementary Table 14). To evaluate the effects on circulating monocyte counts, FACS analysis was conducted in the same samples, and the mean percentage of total leukocytes analyzed by FACS that were Gr1- CD11b+ was equivalent in the two mouse groups (6.36% in S1pr4+/+ mice and 6.20% in S1pr4−/− mice, p=0.80, Supplementary Figures 3–4). Since abnormalities of leukocyte bone marrow egress have been described in the setting of S1pr1 deficiency,[36] we evaluated the proportion of neutrophils in the bone marrow and spleen, to evaluate whether cells may be abnormally retained in these tissues, and the expression of specific adhesion molecules involved in leukocyte trafficking. No significant differences in neutrophil proportions or absolute counts were observed in the bone marrow or spleen (Supplementary Table 14, Supplementary Figures 3–6). Cd49b and Cxcr4 expression on bone marrow neutrophils were not differentially expressed (p>0.05), whereas Cd62l, or L-selectin, expression measured on circulating neutrophils was reduced approximately 2-fold in the S1pr4−/− mice (p=0.003) across both groups of mice studied. Since lower L-selectin expression may reflect shedding upon activation and cell extravasation in tissues, we evaluated tissue neutrophil numbers in the liver and lung of S1pr4 and wild-type mice. Neutrophil numbers were lower in both tissues in S1pr4 mice, with a 29.2% reduction in liver (p=0.12) and 40.2% reduction in lung (p=0.02) Supplementary Figure 7).
Figure 3
Blood neutrophils in S1pr4−/− mice
(A–C) Neutrophil numbers. Blood cells from 2–4 month–old S1pr4 (n=24) and S1pr4−/− (n=24) mice were stained with anti–Gr–1 and anti–CD11b antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. Neutrophils were identified as Gr–1high CD11b+. Results are shown as density plots (A), as absolute numbers per μl of blood (B) and as the percentage of cells analyzed (C). (D–G) Adhesion molecule expression on blood neutrophils. Blood neutrophils from S1pr4 and S1pr4−/− mice were analyzed by flow cytometry for the expression of CD49d (D), CD62L (E, F) and CXCR4 (G). Expression of CD49 is shown as percentage of Gr1+ CD11b+ CD49high (immature neutrophils) and Gr1+ CD11b+ CD49low (mature neutrophils) (D). Expression of CD62L (F) and CXCR4 (G) on Gr1+ CD11b+ cells are shown as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Representative histogram analysis showing the CD62L expression for S1pr4 neutrophils (blue line), S1pr4 neutrophils (red line) and the corresponding isotype control staining (green line) (E). The bars represent mean values, and the closed circles are individual mice. S1pr4 (open bars) and S1pr4 (red bars). Student’s t test *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ns, not significant.
To further assess the impact of disrupted s1pr4 expression in vivo, we conducted parallel experiments in zebrafish in which gene expression may be manipulated readily using morpholino (MO) antisense technology to specifically knock down the expression of target genes.[37] In the comparison of embryos injected with ATG-MO’s designed against two independent sequences (Supplementary Note) within the single exon of s1pr4 (n=14 and 19) to non-specific MO (n=22), we confirmed a 36.6% and 34.3% decrease in neutrophil count in the two batches of whole embryos at two days post fertilization (dpf) (p=3.8×10−6 and p=4.4×10−7, respectively) (Figure 4; Supplementary Table 15).
Figure 4
Reduction in neutrophil counts in zebrafish embryos with decreased s1pr4 expression by morpholino knock–down with two independent morpholino oligonucleotides
Representative images of zebrafish mpx–gfp fish are shown, demonstrating decreases in neutrophil number in s1pr4 morphants at 2 dpf. (A-C) The top set of panels are composite images of differential interference contrast (DIC), the middle panels are images using fluorescence (green channel), and the bottom panels are black and white images of the fluorescent signal of the same embryo injected at 2 dpf with either (A) non–specific MO, (B) 2 ng/embryo morphlino 1, or (C) 2 ng/embryo morphlino 2; D) distribution of average numbers of neutrophils across s1pr4 MO 1 (n=14), s1pr4 MO 2 (n=19) and non-specific MO (n=22). ****Student t–test p–value < 0.0001. Scale bar represents 300 μm and is the same for all panels.
Finally, to assess neutrophil behavior in response to injury, a cutaneous wound was made on the ventral side of the tail fin of the embryos at 2 dpf after treatment with the s1pr4 MO versus uninjected controls, and the numbers of neutrophils around the wound area at intervals up to five hours post injury were counted to quantify neutrophil recruitment and resolution in response to the injury. The overall number of neutrophils recruited to the wound was higher and took place faster in embryos treated with s1pr4 MO; however, after initial recruitment a trend for higher reverse migration rate and fewer cells retained at the site of injury in the s1pr4 morphants (Supplementary Table 16) suggests that the time course of neutrophil response to injury and/or resolution of inflammation may be altered in the setting of decreased s1pr4 expression (Figure 5).
Figure 5
Neutrophil migration in response to injury is altered in embryos with low S1pr4 gene expression
Neutrophil recruitment and resolution in zebrafish at site of cutaneous wound in the tail fin. A series of images from time–lapse movies of control (A) and s1pr4 morphant (B) embryos post injury. The red squares mark the injury area where numbers of neutrophil were counted. Green = mpx:GFP marked. Quantification plots are shown for the number of neutrophils in the marked injury area over time post injury (C). Scale bar represents 200 μm and is the same for all panels.
Discussion
Using a custom genotyping array with focused coverage of missense and loss-of-function variants in exonic regions, we conducted an analysis of erythrocyte and leukocyte traits in as many as 52,531 individuals of European, African and Hispanic ancestry. We identified and replicated 9 novel genetic loci associated with inter-individual differences in blood cell traits and have extended the role of several common variants previously associated with non-hematologic traits to erythrocyte or WBC phenotypes. Of these new findings, we identified a novel association between a rare missense variant in S1PR4 and WBC and neutrophil counts, and confirmed a role for this gene in two model organisms. Our findings highlight the importance of genes involved in erythrocyte membrane composition and leukocyte trafficking in the regulation of peripheral erythrocyte and WBC phenotypes.The rare missense variant in S1PR4 (p.Arg365Leu/rs3746072; MAFmeta0.006) was robustly associated with total WBC count and neutrophil count. S1PR4 belongs to a family of G-coupled protein receptors for spingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a lysophospholipid which functions as an extracellular signaling molecule with diverse biologic functions, including leukocyte trafficking.[38] Another S1P receptor subtype, S1PR1, plays an important role in regulating immune cell function and lymphocyte trafficking by regulating egress of lymphocytes from bone marrow and lymphoid tissues;[39-41] however, much less is known about the function of S1PR4. S1PR4 is expressed on hematopoietic and lymphoid cells and has been implicated in terminal megakaryocyte differentiation to platelets,[42] and the regulation of dendritic cell function and T(H)17-cell[43] and plasmacytoid dendritic cell[44] differentiation. S1PR4 is highly expressed in neutrophils and lymphocytes. In the setting of combined s1p lyase and S1pr4 deletion in mice, neutrophilia and inflammation are decreased compared to S1P lyase deficiency alone. This suggests that S1PR4 may mediate the higher neutrophil count that accompanies highly elevated S1P levels in mice with S1P lyase deficiency.[35,45]Here, we confirm in two in vivo vertebrate model systems (mouse and zebrafish) that loss of S1pr4 function leads to lower basal numbers (and proportion) of circulating neutrophils, consistent with the association observed in human p.Arg365Leu carriers. The mild reduction in neutrophil count suggests a hypothesis of abnormal neutrophil trafficking, rather than a critical role in neutrophil development. Bone marrow egress of leukocytes is known to be impaired in the setting of S1pr1 deficiency.[39-41] We therefore examined the expression of previously defined key adhesion molecules for leukocyte migration in response to S1P signaling in the bone marrow neutrophils of S1pr4 null mice, including CD49b, which is abnormally expressed in S1pr1 and S1P lyase deficient states,[36] and CXCR4, which interacts with the cytokine peptide SDF-1 required for cellular bone marrow egress.[46,47] We did not find any alterations of these adhesion molecules, and we did not observe accumulation of neutrophils in the bone marrow or spleen, which corroborates a lack of effect on egress of neutrophils. Because neutrophil recruitment to injured or infected tissue is a key process, we evaluated neutrophil CD62L surface expression, which mediates interactions between the neutrophil and endothelium and is required for leukocyte trafficking across the endothelial border.[48] CD62L neutrophil expression was reduced approximately two-fold in the S1pr4 null mouse. Since CD62L is shed from the surface of neutrophils upon activation and mediates leukocyte extravasation into tissues, we examined whether tissue neutrophil counts were elevated in the S1pr4 null mouse, accounting for lower circulating neutrophil counts. However, tissue neutrophil numbers were not increased in the S1pr4 null mouse compared to the wild-type; rather they were similarly decreased as in the blood.In the zebrafish s1pr4 morphants, neutrophil accumulation and resolution at the site of a cutaneous wound occurred earlier than in controls, suggesting impaired cellular inflammation in response to tissue injury. Further experiments to delineate neutrophil-endothelial cell interactions will be needed to delineate further the precise mechanisms by which S1PR4 impacts circulating neutrophil counts. Together, our observations support the role of S1PR4 in the regulation of neutrophil counts and potentially clinically relevant impairment in response to injury or infection.Blood monocyte counts are altered in the setting of chronic inflammatory disease and various infections, both viral and non-viral. NLRP12 is a member of a sub-group of a non-inflammasome forming NLR family that attenuates inflammation by suppressing NF-κB signaling in activated monocytes.[49]
NLRP12 loss-of-function mutations have been identified in families with hereditary periodic fever syndromes[50]. The missense variant reported here, p.Gly39Val, was not reported in these families and is not present in the ClinVar database.[51] In humans and mice, NLRP12 is highly expressed in bone marrow, and macrophages from Nlrp12-deficient mice exhibit decreased chemotaxis in response to chemokines in vitro suggesting that NLRP12 is important for leukocyte cell trafficking.[52]
IL17RA is a proinflammatory cytokine with a role in hematopoietic cell maturation, and vascular IL-17RA supports monocyte adherence.[53,54] Mutations in IL17RA are associated with familial candidiasis.[55]Eosinophil counts are altered in parasitic infection, allergic and autoimmune diseases such as asthma and inflammatory bowel disease. The IL33 variant rs1342326 has previously been associated with asthma,[29] and IL33 activates eosinophils.[56] The IRF1 variant (rs12521868), which we show to be associated with IRF1 expression, has been previously associated with Crohn’s disease.[57]
IRF1 is also near IL5, a known regulator of eosinophil production previously associated with eosinophil count.[58]We observed novel erythrocyte trait associations for common non-coding SNPs representing two genomic regions previously associated with kidney function, near SHROOM3 and near CEP89.[19,59] For both loci, the allele associated with lower Hb and Hct was associated with higher eGFR,[17] suggesting that these erythrocyte trait associations are not mediated through an effect of renal dysfunction and related decreased erythropoietin production. The SHROOM3 locus has additionally been associated with serum magnesium levels.[18] The effects of these two loci on erythrocyte, renal, and electrolyte traits may occur instead through cytoskeleton-dependent solute/ion channels shared between kidney epithelia and erythrocyte membranes, as has been demonstrated in other examples such as PIEZO1, another GWAS locus for erythrocyte traits. PIEZO1 is a RBC membrane mechano-sensitive cation channel that appears to require actin cytoskeleton reorganization[60,61] and senses mechanical forces associated with fluid flow and/or circumferential stretch in epithelial cells at the basolateral side of renal proximal convoluted tubules.[62-64] Dominant missense mutations of PIEZO1 have been reported in patients with hereditary xerocytosis,[65] a congenital hemolytic anemia characterized by dehydrated, shrunken erythrocytes and the presence of stomatocytes due to increased potassium permeability. By analogy, SHROOM3 is an actin-binding protein involved in epithelial shape regulation, modulating ion channel activity through myosin II-dependent cytoskeletal re-organization in the kidney.[66] Its role in erythrocyte function has yet to be tested experimentally. CEP89 is a ubiquitously expressed and highly conserved gene for which biologic function is not well known. CEP89 is flanked by SLC7A9, a kidney solute transporter. Mutations in SLC7A9 result in congenital cystinuria.[67] Our eQTL analyses showed a significant association of the index SNP associated with Hb and Hct and SLC7A9 transcript levels in multiple tissue types and most strongly in whole blood, supporting a possible hematologic function.FADS1 and FADS2 encode the two rate-limiting desaturases in the conversion of dietary essential medium-chain PUFAs (e.g., α-linoleic acid [ALA]), to long-chain PUFAs (arachadonic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA], docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]). The minor allele of the FADS2 intronic variant rs1535-G is associated with higher levels of ALA and lower levels of EPA and DHA. This suggests less efficient conversion due to decreased FADS activity,[21] as well as cholesterol levels and pro-inflammatory eicosanoids.[68] Here we report that the same FADS2 allele is associated with higher RBC count, Hb and Hct. rs1535 is in strong LD with other common SNPs in the FADS1-FADS2 region on chromosome 11q12.2, including several eQTL SNPs for FADS1. Our eQTL analysis of this region showed strong associations of these SNPs with FADS1, FADS2 and FADS3 expression levels. Long-chain PUFAs are incorporated into erythrocyte membrane glycerolipids, affecting erythrocyte membrane fluidity, permeability, and sensitivity to oxidative damage and subsequent hemolysis.[69] Nonetheless, the association of rs1535 with higher RBC count suggests additional mechanisms. In this regard, rs1535 is also located ~100 kb from FTH1, which encodes the heavy subunit of ferritin, the major intracellular iron storage protein which is expressed in both mature erythrocytes and early erythroid precursors.Pleiotropy (i.e., more than one trait associated with the same locus) was observed for erythrocyte associations at the CEP89, FADS1 and HFE loci, and we extended the association of the well-characterized common HBSL1-MYB regulatory variant, previously associated with erythrocyte and platelet traits, to WBC count. MYB encodes c-Myb, a transcription factor and proto-oncogene expressed in immature hematopoietic cells and leukemic cells that plays an essential role in the regulation of normal hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis.[70] In addition, we confirmed the previously reported association of the chromosome 12q24 SH2B3 region with erythrocyte and WBC traits; this locus has been associated with multiple cardiovascular and inflammatory traits and diseases.[9,71-73]Our results add to recent observations that rare coding variants contribute to phenotypic differences in complex blood cell traits among community-dwelling individuals unselected for hematologic disorders. Experimental testing of S1PR4 loss of function in vivo, performed to follow up a S1PR4 rare missense variant association in our study, showed novel biologic effects on neutrophil count and function. Common variants originally associated with a single blood cell trait through GWAS, such as SH2B3, have subsequently been associated with traits related to all 3 blood cell lineages,[10,74] as well as non-hematologic traits,[73,75,76] and these pleiotropic effects will be useful to discern patterns suggesting specific biologic hypotheses for further mechanistic hypothesis testing.
Methods (online)
Our discovery sample consisted of exome chip data from 52,531 individuals, including 37,775 European Americans (EA), 11,589 African Americans (AA), and 3,167 Hispanic Americans (HA) sampled from 16 population-based cohorts participating in the CHARGE Consortium[77]: Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility study (AGES), Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), Family Heart Study (FamHS), Framingham Heart Study (FHS), Health ABC (HABC), Health2006/2008, the Mount Sinai Institute for Personalized Medicine BioMe Biobank Project (BioMe), Jackson Heart Study (JHS), the Lothian Birth Cohorts 1921/1936 (LBC), Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), the Rotterdam Study (RS), the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI; AAs only), and the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study (YFS). The replication sample consisted of 17,500 samples from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI; EAs only) and 5,261 Han Chinese individuals from the Peking University – University of Michigan Study of Atherosclerosis (PUUMA). Descriptions of each of the cohorts and the techniques used to measure the hematologic traits are provided in previous publications (Supplementary Note) and summarized in Supplementary Table 1. All participants provided written informed consent as approved by local human-subjects committees.
Erythrocyte and Leukocyte Phenotypes
The hematology traits we studied included hemoglobin concentration (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), red blood cell (RBC) count, red cell distribution width (RDW), total white blood cell (WBC) count, and counts of the WBC subtypes neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, basophils, and eosinophils, using the transformations defined in Supplementary Table 1. Traits were harmonized across cohorts for the same units of measurement, and within each cohort, traits were transformed according to standard convention (Supplementary Table 1). We Winsorized values greater than three standard deviations of the population mean for each trait in each cohort in order to reduce false positives caused by extreme outliers while still maintaining power to identify a potential signal with strong effect.
Genotyping and quality control
Genotypes were assayed using the Illumina HumanExome Beadchip (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Genotype calls were assigned using GenomeStudio v2010.3. Samples were excluded if any of the following applied to them: a call-rate less than 95%, ethnic outlier in a principal components analysis, evidence of contamination, sex mismatch, or unexpected cryptic relatedness. SNPs were excluded with call-rates less than 95% or if they deviated from Hardy-Weinberg at p<5×10−6. For the SNPs identified by the association analyses, the cluster plots were visually inspected.
Association analysis of single variants and implementation of gene-based tests
Variants were annotated using dbNSFP v2.0.[78,79] Phenotypes were first transformed (either natural log transform, square root, or none at all, as delineated in Supplementary Table 1 and then Winsorized at 3 standard deviations (mean and standard deviation was computed separately for each cohort and the threshold was computed as mean±3 standard deviations; any individual with a value exceeding this threshold was replaced with this threshold). Age, sex, study (if needed), and principal components were included as covariates in the analyses. The R skatMeta (v1.4.2) package was used for all cohort-level analyses. Each study used either the skatCohort or the skatFamCohort function to create an R object that was then uploaded to a central server.After performing quality control of the genotypes as described previously,[80] we analyzed 247,870 SNPs meeting quality control, using single variant association tests and gene-based tests of aggregate variants. For single variant association tests, a minor allele count filter of at least 40 was used for each trait. As a secondary analysis, we lowered this filter to a minor allele count of 10 or greater, to evaluate for any lower frequency alleles with strong effects (Supplementary Note; Supplementary Figure 8). For gene-based testing, only coding variants putatively affecting protein structure (missense, stop-gain, stop-loss, and splice variants) that also had a frequency < 5% in a given population (~200,000 SNPs) were included.In parallel with the single-variant association tests, we conducted aggregate variant testing using two methods: the T5 test[81] (MAF < 0.05) and the SKAT test[82] (MAF < 0.05, Wu weights). The T5 test identifies those genes where multiple samples have private or rare mutations leading to a strong effect in a single direction. The SKAT test allows for different variants to have effects in different directions. In both tests, only those variants with a possible effect on amino acid sequence (missense, stop-gain, stop-loss, and splice variants) were included in the analysis.
Meta-analysis of single variant and gene-based tests
Single variant and gene-based association statistics were combined in a fixed-effects, inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis and performed in parallel at two different sites using the same skatMeta package. Analyses were stratified first by ancestry and then combined in a trans-ethnic analysis using the same methodology. Results for single variant analyses were reported only when 40 or more minor allele counts were observed, and a Bonferroni correction for the number of tests was employed to determine significance. For gene-based tests, two different methods were employed. The first was the Combined Multivariate and Collapsing (CMC) approach,[81] where the number of qualifying variants in each gene were added together for each individual separately and then used as the predictor in a linear regression model. To be included, a variant had to have an average allele frequency less than 5% across all cohorts and also change the amino acid sequence of an mRNA, either as a missense, stop-gain, stop-loss, frameshift or splice site variant. The second method was the SKAT method[82] and used the same set of variants as the CMC/T5 approach. Only those genes with a minor allele count greater than 40 were analyzed, and a Bonferroni correction for the number of genes tested was employed to determine significance. The number of individuals with each of the hematologic traits under study differed, and consequently the number of markers reaching our minor allele count threshold of 40 varied by trait. We therefore applied trait-specific p-value thresholds, according to the number of variants available for the individuals with each trait (Supplementary Table 5).
Independent replication analysis
We conducted follow-up replication analysis in 18,018 independent EA samples from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) and 5,261 Han Chinese individuals from the Shijingshan district of Beijing that participated in the Peking University – University of Michigan Study of Atherosclerosis (PUUMA) (Supplementary Note). Both studies were genotyped using an Illumina HumanExome BeadChip genotyping array and had erythrocyte and WBC traits available.[16] All novel, significant (p
Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis
We identified proxy SNPs in high linkage disequilibrium (LD; r2>0.8) with associated index SNPs in 3 HapMap builds and 1000 Genomes with SNAP[83]. SNP rsIDs were searched for primary SNPs and LD proxies against a collected database of expression SNP (eSNP) results (Supplementary Note). The collected eSNP results met criteria for statistical thresholds for association with gene transcript levels as described in the original papers.
Mouse experiments
S1pr4+/− mice on a C57Bl/6 background (stock number 005799) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME.[35] Mice were housed in a clean conventional facility that excluded specific mouse pathogens. All animal procedures were approved by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guidelines. Because neutrophil counts are known to exhibit a high degree of variability within the same mouse and between mice, and by sex,[84,85] we studied a total of 48 mice. The first 24 mice (6 S1pr4 females, 6 S1pr4 males, 6 S1pr4+/+ females, and 6 S1pr4+/+ males) were all littermates (“Experiment 1” in Supplementary Table 14). In a second set of confirmatory experiments, 12 S1pr4 mice were compared to 12 C57BL6 controls (Jackson Labs), again with equal proportions of males and females in each genotype group (“Experiment 2” in Supplementary Table 14). Mice were genotyped by multiplex PCR from tail snips using the set of primers and conditions as previously described.[35] Mice were analyzed between 2 and 4 months after birth.Total bone marrow cells were isolated from mice by flushing the femur and tibia from both legs two times with 1 ml of PBS. To obtain total leukocytes, spleen was dissected and mechanically disaggregated. Single-cell suspensions were obtained using a 40-μm cell strainer. Blood samples were obtained by cardiac puncture. Erythrocytes were removed by ammonium chloride lysis. Absolute blood cell counts were determined by flow cytometry using CALTAG counting beads (Life Technology, Grand Island, NY), and % neutrophils of the total leukocyte pool were calculated and analyzed to account for any possible pipetting error. Neutrophils were analyzed by flow cytometry as previously described.[35] All antibodies were purchased from BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA and were used in 1/50 dilutions. Briefly, cells were diluted in 1% BSA-PBS and incubated with anti-FcgR antibody (catalog # 553141 clone 2.4G2) followed by the antibodies anti-mouse Gr-1 (allophycocyanin [APC]-conjugated) (catalog # 553129 clone RB6-8C5) and anti-mouse CD11b (phycoerythrin [PE]-conjugated) (catalog # 553311 clone m1/70). Cells were also incubated with anti-mouse CD62L (catalog # 553150 clone MEL-14), CD49d (catalog # 553156 clone R1-2) and CXCR4 (catalog # 551967 clone 2B11/CXCR4) (all three antibodies were fluorescein-conjugated). After cells were labeled for 30 minutes on ice, and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS, then subjected to flow cytometry on a FACScalibur (BD Bioscience). Data were analyzed using the FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). Neutrophils were identified as Gr-1+ CD11b+ cells, and monocytes were identified as Gr-1- CD11b+ cells.
Zebrafish experiments
Zebrafish ortholog s1pr4 was identified by sequence homology searches and gene synteny analysis, and MO design also incorporated information about gene structure and translational initiation sites (Gene-Tool Inc., Philomath, OR). Two separate MO’s were designed against s1pr4, which is a single exon gene, in the ATG region to inhibit its mRNA translation (see Supplementary Table 15) MOs were injected at multiple doses into one-cell stage embryos of the mpx1-gfp zebrafish line to find the optimal dose, 2 ng/embryo, and the number of gfp-expressing cells was imaged under a spinning-disk confocal microscope and counted at 2 days post fertilization. Experiments were conducted in >10 each of control and morphant embryos. The day 2 cutaneous injury was created 2 days after MO injection by nicking the tail fin, and the number of gfp+ cells at the site of the cutaneous wound was counted at 30 minutes, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours post injury. Paired, one-tailed t-tests were computed for the comparison groups, and linear regression analysis of neutrophil numbers at the cutaneous wound in the time series was performed. Experiments were done in replicates of at least 10 embryos by a technician and analysis was checked by a postdoctoral fellow blinded to MO injection status.
Authors: Andrew D Johnson; Robert E Handsaker; Sara L Pulit; Marcia M Nizzari; Christopher J O'Donnell; Paul I W de Bakker Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2008-10-30 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Sanjeev S Ranade; Zhaozhu Qiu; Seung-Hyun Woo; Sung Sik Hur; Swetha E Murthy; Stuart M Cahalan; Jie Xu; Jayanti Mathur; Michael Bandell; Bertrand Coste; Yi-Shuan J Li; Shu Chien; Ardem Patapoutian Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-06-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: L Feliubadaló; M Font; J Purroy; F Rousaud; X Estivill; V Nunes; E Golomb; M Centola; I Aksentijevich; Y Kreiss; B Goldman; M Pras; D L Kastner; E Pras; P Gasparini; L Bisceglia; E Beccia; M Gallucci; L de Sanctis; A Ponzone; G F Rizzoni; L Zelante; M T Bassi; A L George; M Manzoni; A De Grandi; M Riboni; J K Endsley; A Ballabio; G Borsani; N Reig; E Fernández; R Estévez; M Pineda; D Torrents; M Camps; J Lloberas; A Zorzano; M Palacín Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Yukinori Okada; Tomomitsu Hirota; Yoichiro Kamatani; Atsushi Takahashi; Hiroko Ohmiya; Natsuhiko Kumasaka; Koichiro Higasa; Yumi Yamaguchi-Kabata; Naoya Hosono; Michael A Nalls; Ming Huei Chen; Frank J A van Rooij; Albert V Smith; Toshiko Tanaka; David J Couper; Neil A Zakai; Luigi Ferrucci; Dan L Longo; Dena G Hernandez; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Tamara B Harris; Christopher J O'Donnell; Santhi K Ganesh; Koichi Matsuda; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; Toshihiro Tanaka; Michiaki Kubo; Yusuke Nakamura; Mayumi Tamari; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Naoyuki Kamatani Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Melissa J Landrum; Jennifer M Lee; George R Riley; Wonhee Jang; Wendy S Rubinstein; Deanna M Church; Donna R Maglott Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Linda Kachuri; Soyoung Jeon; Andrew T DeWan; Catherine Metayer; Xiaomei Ma; John S Witte; Charleston W K Chiang; Joseph L Wiemels; Adam J de Smith Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2021-08-31 Impact factor: 11.043
Authors: Yao Hu; Adrienne M Stilp; Caitlin P McHugh; Shuquan Rao; Deepti Jain; Xiuwen Zheng; John Lane; Sébastian Méric de Bellefon; Laura M Raffield; Ming-Huei Chen; Lisa R Yanek; Marsha Wheeler; Yao Yao; Chunyan Ren; Jai Broome; Jee-Young Moon; Paul S de Vries; Brian D Hobbs; Quan Sun; Praveen Surendran; Jennifer A Brody; Thomas W Blackwell; Hélène Choquet; Kathleen Ryan; Ravindranath Duggirala; Nancy Heard-Costa; Zhe Wang; Nathalie Chami; Michael H Preuss; Nancy Min; Lynette Ekunwe; Leslie A Lange; Mary Cushman; Nauder Faraday; Joanne E Curran; Laura Almasy; Kousik Kundu; Albert V Smith; Stacey Gabriel; Jerome I Rotter; Myriam Fornage; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Ramachandran S Vasan; Nicholas L Smith; Kari E North; Eric Boerwinkle; Lewis C Becker; Joshua P Lewis; Goncalo R Abecasis; Lifang Hou; Jeffrey R O'Connell; Alanna C Morrison; Terri H Beaty; Robert Kaplan; Adolfo Correa; John Blangero; Eric Jorgenson; Bruce M Psaty; Charles Kooperberg; Russell T Walton; Benjamin P Kleinstiver; Hua Tang; Ruth J F Loos; Nicole Soranzo; Adam S Butterworth; Debbie Nickerson; Stephen S Rich; Braxton D Mitchell; Andrew D Johnson; Paul L Auer; Yun Li; Rasika A Mathias; Guillaume Lettre; Nathan Pankratz; Cathy C Laurie; Cecelia A Laurie; Daniel E Bauer; Matthew P Conomos; Alexander P Reiner Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Frank J A van Rooij; Rehan Qayyum; Albert V Smith; Yi Zhou; Stella Trompet; Toshiko Tanaka; Margaux F Keller; Li-Ching Chang; Helena Schmidt; Min-Lee Yang; Ming-Huei Chen; James Hayes; Andrew D Johnson; Lisa R Yanek; Christian Mueller; Leslie Lange; James S Floyd; Mohsen Ghanbari; Alan B Zonderman; J Wouter Jukema; Albert Hofman; Cornelia M van Duijn; Karl C Desch; Yasaman Saba; Ayse B Ozel; Beverly M Snively; Jer-Yuarn Wu; Reinhold Schmidt; Myriam Fornage; Robert J Klein; Caroline S Fox; Koichi Matsuda; Naoyuki Kamatani; Philipp S Wild; David J Stott; Ian Ford; P Eline Slagboom; Jaden Yang; Audrey Y Chu; Amy J Lambert; André G Uitterlinden; Oscar H Franco; Edith Hofer; David Ginsburg; Bella Hu; Brendan Keating; Ursula M Schick; Jennifer A Brody; Jun Z Li; Zhao Chen; Tanja Zeller; Jack M Guralnik; Daniel I Chasman; Luanne L Peters; Michiaki Kubo; Diane M Becker; Jin Li; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Jerome I Rotter; Daniel Levy; Vera Grossmann; Kushang V Patel; Chien-Hsiun Chen; Paul M Ridker; Hua Tang; Lenore J Launer; Kenneth M Rice; Ruifang Li-Gao; Luigi Ferrucci; Michelle K Evans; Avik Choudhuri; Eirini Trompouki; Brian J Abraham; Song Yang; Atsushi Takahashi; Yoichiro Kamatani; Charles Kooperberg; Tamara B Harris; Sun Ha Jee; Josef Coresh; Fuu-Jen Tsai; Dan L Longo; Yuan-Tsong Chen; Janine F Felix; Qiong Yang; Bruce M Psaty; Eric Boerwinkle; Lewis C Becker; Dennis O Mook-Kanamori; James G Wilson; Vilmundur Gudnason; Christopher J O'Donnell; Abbas Dehghan; L Adrienne Cupples; Michael A Nalls; Andrew P Morris; Yukinori Okada; Alexander P Reiner; Leonard I Zon; Santhi K Ganesh Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 11.043
Authors: William J Astle; Heather Elding; Tao Jiang; Dave Allen; Dace Ruklisa; Alice L Mann; Daniel Mead; Heleen Bouman; Fernando Riveros-Mckay; Myrto A Kostadima; John J Lambourne; Suthesh Sivapalaratnam; Kate Downes; Kousik Kundu; Lorenzo Bomba; Kim Berentsen; John R Bradley; Louise C Daugherty; Olivier Delaneau; Kathleen Freson; Stephen F Garner; Luigi Grassi; Jose Guerrero; Matthias Haimel; Eva M Janssen-Megens; Anita Kaan; Mihir Kamat; Bowon Kim; Amit Mandoli; Jonathan Marchini; Joost H A Martens; Stuart Meacham; Karyn Megy; Jared O'Connell; Romina Petersen; Nilofar Sharifi; Simon M Sheard; James R Staley; Salih Tuna; Martijn van der Ent; Klaudia Walter; Shuang-Yin Wang; Eleanor Wheeler; Steven P Wilder; Valentina Iotchkova; Carmel Moore; Jennifer Sambrook; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Stephen Kaptoge; Taco W Kuijpers; Enrique Carrillo-de-Santa-Pau; David Juan; Daniel Rico; Alfonso Valencia; Lu Chen; Bing Ge; Louella Vasquez; Tony Kwan; Diego Garrido-Martín; Stephen Watt; Ying Yang; Roderic Guigo; Stephan Beck; Dirk S Paul; Tomi Pastinen; David Bujold; Guillaume Bourque; Mattia Frontini; John Danesh; David J Roberts; Willem H Ouwehand; Adam S Butterworth; Nicole Soranzo Journal: Cell Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Abdou Mousas; Georgios Ntritsos; Ming-Huei Chen; Ci Song; Jennifer E Huffman; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Paul Elliott; Bruce M Psaty; Paul L Auer; Andrew D Johnson; Evangelos Evangelou; Guillaume Lettre; Alexander P Reiner Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 5.917