Literature DB >> 15922992

The influence of micro-motion on the tissue differentiation around immediately loaded cylindrical turned titanium implants.

J Duyck1, K Vandamme, L Geris, H Van Oosterwyck, M De Cooman, J Vandersloten, R Puers, I Naert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of various degrees of implant displacement on the tissue differentiation around immediately loaded cylindrical turned titanium implants.
DESIGN: The experiments were conducted in repeated sampling bone chambers placed in the tibia of 10 rabbits. Tissues could grow into the bone chambers via perforations. Due to its double structure, tissues inside the chamber could be harvested leaving the chamber intact. This allowed several experiments within the same animal. The chambers contained a cylindrical turned titanium implant that was loaded in a well-controlled manner. In each of the 10 chambers, four experiments were conducted with the following test conditions: immediate implant loading by inducing 0 (control), 30, 60 and 90 microm implant displacement, 800 cycles per day at a frequency of 1 Hz, twice a week during a period of 6 weeks. Histological and histomorphometrical analyses were performed on methylmethacrylate histological sections. An ANOVA was conducted on the dataset.
RESULTS: The total tissue volume was significantly lowest in the unloaded control condition. The bone volume fraction on the other hand, was significantly larger in the unloaded and 90 microm implant displacement, compared to the 30 microm implant displacement. Bone density increased with increasing micro-motion with significantly higher values for the 60 microm- and 90 microm-test conditions compared to the unloaded situation. The chance to have bone-to-implant contact decreased in case of micro-motion at the tissues-implant interface.
CONCLUSION: The magnitude of implant displacement had a statistically significant effect on the tissue differentiation around immediately loaded cylindrical turned titanium implants. Implant micro-motion had a detrimental effect on the bone-to-implant contact in an immediate loading regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15922992     DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2005.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  25 in total

1.  In vivo assessment of the effect of controlled high- and low-frequency mechanical loading on peri-implant bone healing.

Authors:  Xiaolei Zhang; Katleen Vandamme; Antonia Torcasio; Toru Ogawa; G Harry van Lenthe; Ignace Naert; Joke Duyck
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Nanoscale surface modifications of medically relevant metals: state-of-the art and perspectives.

Authors:  Fabio Variola; John B Brunski; Giovanna Orsini; Paulo Tambasco de Oliveira; Rima Wazen; Antonio Nanci
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 3.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Lateral static overload on immediately restored implants decreases the osteocyte index in peri-implant bone: a secondary analysis of a pre-clinical study in dogs.

Authors:  Celson Domingos de Calais; Dimorvan Bordin; Adriano Piattelli; Giovanna Iezzi; Alexandre Negretto; Jamil A Shibli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Valles; Xavier Rodríguez-Ciurana; Marco Clementini; Mariana Baglivo; Blanca Paniagua; Jose Nart
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Micromotion-induced strain fields influence early stages of repair at bone-implant interfaces.

Authors:  Rima M Wazen; Jennifer A Currey; Hongqiang Guo; John B Brunski; Jill A Helms; Antonio Nanci
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  High-frequency loading positively impacts titanium implant osseointegration in impaired bone.

Authors:  M Chatterjee; K Hatori; J Duyck; K Sasaki; I Naert; K Vandamme
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Micromechanical modeling of the contact stiffness of an osseointegrated bone-implant interface.

Authors:  Maria Letizia Raffa; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Guillaume Haiat
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Time course of peri-implant bone regeneration around loaded and unloaded implants in a rat model.

Authors:  Shailly H Jariwala; Hwabok Wee; Evan P Roush; Tiffany L Whitcomb; Christopher Murter; Gery Kozlansky; Akhlesh Lakhtakia; Allen R Kunselman; Henry J Donahue; April D Armstrong; Gregory S Lewis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  The improved biological performance of a novel low elastic modulus implant.

Authors:  Lei Shi; Lei Shi; Ling Wang; Yonghong Duan; Wei Lei; Zhen Wang; Jing Li; Xiangli Fan; Xiaokang Li; Shujun Li; Zheng Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.