Literature DB >> 27375829

Flexible Bayesian Human Fecundity Models.

Sungduk Kim1, Rajeshwari Sundaram1, Germaine M Buck Louis1, Cecilia Pyper2.   

Abstract

Human fecundity is an issue of considerable interest for both epidemiological and clinical audiences, and is dependent upon a couple's biologic capacity for reproduction coupled with behaviors that place a couple at risk for pregnancy. Bayesian hierarchical models have been proposed to better model the conception probabilities by accounting for the acts of intercourse around the day of ovulation, i.e., during the fertile window. These models can be viewed in the framework of a generalized nonlinear model with an exponential link. However, a fixed choice of link function may not always provide the best fit, leading to potentially biased estimates for probability of conception. Motivated by this, we propose a general class of models for fecundity by relaxing the choice of the link function under the generalized nonlinear model framework. We use a sample from the Oxford Conception Study (OCS) to illustrate the utility and fit of this general class of models for estimating human conception. Our findings reinforce the need for attention to be paid to the choice of link function in modeling conception, as it may bias the estimation of conception probabilities. Various properties of the proposed models are examined and a Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling algorithm was developed for implementing the Bayesian computations. The deviance information criterion measure and logarithm of pseudo marginal likelihood are used for guiding the choice of links. The supplemental material section contains technical details of the proof of the theorem stated in the paper, and contains further simulation results and analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conception; Fecundity; Generalized nonlinear model; Generalized t-distribution; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Menstrual Cycle; Posterior distribution

Year:  2012        PMID: 27375829      PMCID: PMC4926168          DOI: 10.1214/12-ba726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bayesian Anal        ISSN: 1931-6690            Impact factor:   3.728


  22 in total

1.  Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation.

Authors:  D B Dunson; C R Weinberg; D D Baird; J S Kesner; A J Wilcox
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Day-specific probabilities of clinical pregnancy based on two studies with imperfect measures of ovulation.

Authors:  D B Dunson; D D Baird; A J Wilcox; C R Weinberg
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Accounting for unreported and missing intercourse in human fertility studies.

Authors:  D B Dunson; C R Weinberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Bayesian modeling of the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  D B Dunson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A new approach to modeling daily probabilities of conception.

Authors:  P Royston; A Ferreira
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Fecundability, coital frequency and the viability of Ova.

Authors:  D Schwartz; P D Macdonald; V Heuchel
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1980-07

7.  Bayesian inferences on predictors of conception probabilities.

Authors:  David B Dunson; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  The Oxford Conception Study design and recruitment experience.

Authors:  Cecilia Pyper; Lise Bromhall; Sarah Dummett; Douglas G Altman; Pat Brownbill; Michael Murphy
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.980

9.  Models relating the timing of intercourse to the probability of conception and the sex of the baby.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; B C Gladen; A J Wilcox
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  A survival analysis approach to modeling human fecundity.

Authors:  Rajeshwari Sundaram; Alexander C McLain; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 5.899

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer.

Authors:  Melissa M Smarr; Katherine J Sapra; Alison Gemmill; Linda G Kahn; Lauren A Wise; Courtney D Lynch; Pam Factor-Litvak; Sunni L Mumford; Niels E Skakkebaek; Rémy Slama; Danelle T Lobdell; Joseph B Stanford; Tina Kold Jensen; Elizabeth Heger Boyle; Michael L Eisenberg; Paul J Turek; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Marie E Thoma; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  A Model-Based Approach to Detection Limits in Studying Environmental Exposures and Human Fecundity.

Authors:  Sungduk Kim; Zhen Chen; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2019-06-07

3.  Peri-implantation intercourse does not lower fecundability.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Jared L Hansen; Sydney K Willis; Nan Hu; Alun Thomas
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.918

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.