Literature DB >> 21697247

A survival analysis approach to modeling human fecundity.

Rajeshwari Sundaram1, Alexander C McLain, Germaine M Buck Louis.   

Abstract

Understanding conception probabilities is important not only for helping couples to achieve pregnancy but also in identifying acute or chronic reproductive toxicants that affect the highly timed and interrelated processes underlying hormonal profiles, ovulation, libido, and conception during menstrual cycles. Currently, 2 statistical approaches are available for estimating conception probabilities depending upon the research question and extent of data collection during the menstrual cycle: a survival approach when interested in modeling time-to-pregnancy (TTP) in relation to women or couples' purported exposure(s), or a hierarchical Bayesian approach when one is interested in modeling day-specific conception probabilities during the estimated fertile window. We propose a biologically valid discrete survival model that unifies the above 2 approaches while relaxing some assumptions that may not be consistent with human reproduction or behavior. This approach combines both the survival and the hierarchical models allowing investigators to obtain the distribution of TTP and day-specific probabilities during the fertile window in a single model. Our model allows for the consideration of covariate effects at both the cycle and the daily level while accounting for daily variation in conception. We conduct extensive simulations and utilize the New York State Angler Prospective Pregnancy Cohort Study to illustrate our approach. We also provide the code to implement the model in R software in the supplemental section of the supplementary material available at Biostatistics online.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21697247      PMCID: PMC3276273          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxr015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  20 in total

1.  A new approach to modeling daily probabilities of conception.

Authors:  P Royston; A Ferreira
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Fecundability, coital frequency and the viability of Ova.

Authors:  D Schwartz; P D Macdonald; V Heuchel
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1980-07

3.  Bayesian inferences on predictors of conception probabilities.

Authors:  David B Dunson; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A discrete survival model with random effects: an application to time to pregnancy.

Authors:  T H Scheike; T K Jensen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Estimation of the day-specific probabilities of conception: current state of the knowledge and the relevance for epidemiological research.

Authors:  Courtney D Lynch; Leila W Jackson; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  Correlation of sperm count with frequency of ejaculation.

Authors:  R M Levin; J Latimore; A J Wein; K N Van Arsdalen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Maternal serum levels of polychlorinated biphenyls and 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (DDE) and time to pregnancy.

Authors:  Dionne C Gesink Law; Mark A Klebanoff; John W Brock; David B Dunson; Matthew P Longnecker
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Sources of bias in studies of time to pregnancy.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; D D Baird; A J Wilcox
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994 Mar 15-Apr 15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Models relating the timing of intercourse to the probability of conception and the sex of the baby.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; B C Gladen; A J Wilcox
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Polychlorinated biphenyl serum concentrations, lifestyle and time-to-pregnancy.

Authors:  G M Buck Louis; J Dmochowski; C Lynch; P Kostyniak; B M McGuinness; J E Vena
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer.

Authors:  Melissa M Smarr; Katherine J Sapra; Alison Gemmill; Linda G Kahn; Lauren A Wise; Courtney D Lynch; Pam Factor-Litvak; Sunni L Mumford; Niels E Skakkebaek; Rémy Slama; Danelle T Lobdell; Joseph B Stanford; Tina Kold Jensen; Elizabeth Heger Boyle; Michael L Eisenberg; Paul J Turek; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Marie E Thoma; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Estimating the effectiveness in HIV prevention trials by incorporating the exposure process: application to HPTN 035 data.

Authors:  Jingyang Zhang; Elizabeth R Brown
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Semiparametric modeling of grouped current duration data with preferential reporting.

Authors:  Alexander C McLain; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Marie Thoma; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Analysis of in vitro fertilization data with multiple outcomes using discrete time-to-event analysis.

Authors:  Arnab Maity; Paige L Williams; Louise Ryan; Stacey A Missmer; Brent A Coull; Russ Hauser
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A multistate competing risks framework for preconception prediction of pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Kaitlyn Cook; Neil J Perkins; Enrique Schisterman; Sebastien Haneuse
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.612

6.  Joint analysis of longitudinal and survival data measured on nested timescales by using shared parameter models: an application to fecundity data.

Authors:  Alexander C McLain; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 1.864

7.  Flexible Bayesian Human Fecundity Models.

Authors:  Sungduk Kim; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Germaine M Buck Louis; Cecilia Pyper
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.728

8.  Preconception stress increases the risk of infertility: results from a couple-based prospective cohort study--the LIFE study.

Authors:  C D Lynch; R Sundaram; J M Maisog; A M Sweeney; G M Buck Louis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-03-23       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Joint modeling of time-varying HIV exposure and infection for estimation of per-act efficacy in HIV prevention trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Brown; Clara P Dominguez Islas; Jingyang Zhang
Journal:  Stat Commun Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.