Literature DB >> 25047826

A comparison of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation and caffeine on vigilance and cognitive performance during extended wakefulness.

Lindsey K McIntire1, R Andy McKinley2, Chuck Goodyear1, Justin Nelson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sleep deprivation from extended duty hours is a common complaint for many occupations. Caffeine is one of the most common countermeasures used to combat fatigue. However, the benefits of caffeine decline over time and with chronic use.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the pre-frontal cortex at 2 mA for 30 min to remediate the effects of sleep deprivation and to compare the behavioral effects of tDCS with those of caffeine.
METHODS: Three groups of 10 participants each received either active tDCS with placebo gum, caffeine gum with sham tDCS, or sham tDCS with placebo gum during 30 h of extended wakefulness.
RESULTS: Our results show that tDCS prevented a decrement in vigilance and led to better subjective ratings for fatigue, drowsiness, energy, and composite mood compared to caffeine and control in sleep-deprived individuals. Both the tDCS and caffeine produced similar improvements in latencies on a short-term memory task and faster reaction times in a psychomotor task when compared to the placebo group. Interestingly, changes in accuracy for the tDCS group were not correlated to changes in mood; whereas, there was a relationship for the caffeine and sham groups.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that tDCS could be a useful fatigue countermeasure and may be more beneficial than caffeine since boosts in performance and mood last several hours. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Caffeine; Cognition; Sleep deprivation; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25047826     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  34 in total

1.  Passive perceptual learning versus active searching in a novel stimuli vigilance task.

Authors:  James Head; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A Description and Critical Analysis of the Therapeutic Uses of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Implications for Clinical Practice and Research.

Authors:  David E Vance; Pariya L Fazeli; Shameka L Cody; Tyler R Bell; Caitlin Northcutt Pope
Journal:  Nursing (Auckl)       Date:  2016-09-14

Review 3.  Brain rhythm attractor breakdown in Alzheimer's disease: Functional and pathologic implications.

Authors:  Elissaios Karageorgiou; Keith A Vossel
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 4.  Potential of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: Optimizing Trials Toward Clinical Use.

Authors:  Giuseppina Pilloni; Leigh E Charvet; Marom Bikson; Nikhil Palekar; Min-Jeong Kim
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 5.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Tolerability of Repeated Application of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation with Limited Outputs to Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Bhaskar Paneri; Devin Adair; Chris Thomas; Niranjan Khadka; Vaishali Patel; William J Tyler; Lucas Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 7.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Pnina Grossman; Chris Thomas; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Jimmy Jiang; Tatheer Adnan; Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Greg Kronberg; Dennis Truong; Paulo Boggio; André R Brunoni; Leigh Charvet; Felipe Fregni; Brita Fritsch; Bernadette Gillick; Roy H Hamilton; Benjamin M Hampstead; Ryan Jankord; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; David Liebetanz; Anli Liu; Colleen Loo; Michael A Nitsche; Janine Reis; Jessica D Richardson; Alexander Rotenberg; Peter E Turkeltaub; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Natural Compounds as Medical Strategies in the Prevention and Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders Seen in Neurological Diseases.

Authors:  Esra Küpeli Akkol; Irem Tatlı Çankaya; Gökçe Şeker Karatoprak; Elif Carpar; Eduardo Sobarzo-Sánchez; Raffaele Capasso
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Increases the Benefit of At-Home Cognitive Training in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Leigh Charvet; Michael Shaw; Bryan Dobbs; Ariana Frontario; Kathleen Sherman; Marom Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Lauren Krupp; Esmail Zeinapour; Margaret Kasschau
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-02-22

10.  Cervical transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (ctVNS) improves human cognitive performance under sleep deprivation stress.

Authors:  Lindsey K McIntire; R Andy McKinley; Chuck Goodyear; John P McIntire; Rebecca D Brown
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.