Literature DB >> 2007396

A new approach to rowing ergometry: establishing exercise intensity relative to maximum force output.

R L Jensen1, F I Katch.   

Abstract

The present experiment evaluated a new approach to establish exercise intensity during hydraulic rowing ergometry. In contrast to the traditional approach where exercise intensity is augmented by systematically increasing workload, the new procedure increments the intensity of exercise while maintaining a constant percentage of maximum force output. Ten college females exercised on a hydraulic rower that allowed for control of rowing speed and resistance. The new method to establish work intensity was to row at a cadence of 30 c.min-1 at a force output equal to 50% of maximum rowing force at each setting determined dynamically prior to testing. Two protocols were used for the maximum tests on the hydraulic rower. Row 1 was a 17-min, six-stage, incremental continuous row test performed at increasingly difficult settings from easy (setting 1; 603 N) to difficult (setting 6; 893 N). Row 2 was identical to row 1 until 15 min when resistance was reduced to setting 2 (658 N) for "allout" effort during the last 2 min. During this time, cadence declined from 30 c.min-1 to 19.4 c.min-1 at dial setting 6 and increased to 35.4 c.min-1 at dial setting 2. Both rowing protocols were compared to maximal physiological responses during treadmill running (TM). Compared to TM, both rowing protocols elicited significantly lower maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max; P less than 0.05; row 1 = delta 29.0% and row 2 = delta 12.9%) and maximum heart rate (HRmax; P less than 0.05; row 1 = delta 12.9% and row 2 = delta 6.7%). Maximum ventilation (VEmax) during row 1 was also lower by 30.4% than TM (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2007396     DOI: 10.1007/bf00635633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  16 in total

1.  Cardiorespiratory response to exercise on a rowing and bicycle ergometer.

Authors:  D A Cunningham; P B Goode; J B Critz
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1975

2.  Reliability and validity of the Omnitron hydraulic resistance exercise and testing device.

Authors:  P P Lagassé; F I Katch; V L Katch; M A Roy
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.118

3.  Assessment of maximal aerobic power in specifically trained athletes.

Authors:  S B Stromme; F Ingjer; H D Meen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1977-06

Review 4.  Cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic responses to upper body exercise.

Authors:  D R Pendergast
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Interrelationships among various measures of upper body strength assessed by different contraction modes. Evidence for a general strength component.

Authors:  T Hortobagyi; F I Katch; P F LaChance
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

Review 6.  Physiology of upper body exercise.

Authors:  M N Sawka
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 6.230

7.  A comparison of energy expenditure during rowing and cycling ergometry.

Authors:  F C Hagerman; R A Lawrence; M C Mansfield
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Maximal oxygen uptake during exercise with various combinations of arm and leg work.

Authors:  U Bergh; I L Kanstrup; B Ekblom
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 3.531

9.  Muscle mass as a factor limiting physical work.

Authors:  R J Shephard; E Bouhlel; H Vandewalle; H Monod
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1988-04

10.  Muscle hypertrophy in men and women.

Authors:  K J Cureton; M A Collins; D W Hill; F M McElhannon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.