Tze Yee Lim1, Rajat J Kudchadker2, Jihong Wang2, R Jason Stafford3, Christopher MacLellan4, Arvind Rao5, Geoffrey S Ibbott2, Steven J Frank6. 1. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030 and The University of Texas at Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 6767 Bertner Avenue, Houston, Texas 77030. 2. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030. 3. Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030. 4. Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030 and The University of Texas at Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 6767 Bertner Avenue, Houston, Texas 77030. 5. Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030.
Abstract
PURPOSE: For postimplant dosimetric assessment, computed tomography (CT) is commonly used to identify prostate brachytherapy seeds, at the expense of accurate anatomical contouring. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT for anatomical delineation, but identification of the negative-contrast seeds is challenging. Positive-contrast MRI markers were proposed to replace spacers to assist seed localization on MRI images. Visualization of these markers under varying scan parameters was investigated. METHODS: To simulate a clinical scenario, a prostate phantom was implanted with 66 markers and 86 seeds, and imaged on a 3.0T MRI scanner using a 3D fast radiofrequency-spoiled gradient recalled echo acquisition with various combinations of scan parameters. Scan parameters, including flip angle, number of excitations, bandwidth, field-of-view, slice thickness, and encoding steps were systematically varied to study their effects on signal, noise, scan time, image resolution, and artifacts. RESULTS: The effects of pulse sequence parameter selection on the marker signal strength and image noise were characterized. The authors also examined the tradeoff between signal-to-noise ratio, scan time, and image artifacts, such as the wraparound artifact, susceptibility artifact, chemical shift artifact, and partial volume averaging artifact. Given reasonable scan time and managable artifacts, the authors recommended scan parameter combinations that can provide robust visualization of the MRI markers. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended MRI pulse sequence protocol allows for consistent visualization of the markers to assist seed localization, potentially enabling MRI-only prostate postimplant dosimetry.
PURPOSE: For postimplant dosimetric assessment, computed tomography (CT) is commonly used to identify prostate brachytherapy seeds, at the expense of accurate anatomical contouring. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT for anatomical delineation, but identification of the negative-contrast seeds is challenging. Positive-contrast MRI markers were proposed to replace spacers to assist seed localization on MRI images. Visualization of these markers under varying scan parameters was investigated. METHODS: To simulate a clinical scenario, a prostate phantom was implanted with 66 markers and 86 seeds, and imaged on a 3.0T MRI scanner using a 3D fast radiofrequency-spoiled gradient recalled echo acquisition with various combinations of scan parameters. Scan parameters, including flip angle, number of excitations, bandwidth, field-of-view, slice thickness, and encoding steps were systematically varied to study their effects on signal, noise, scan time, image resolution, and artifacts. RESULTS: The effects of pulse sequence parameter selection on the marker signal strength and image noise were characterized. The authors also examined the tradeoff between signal-to-noise ratio, scan time, and image artifacts, such as the wraparound artifact, susceptibility artifact, chemical shift artifact, and partial volume averaging artifact. Given reasonable scan time and managable artifacts, the authors recommended scan parameter combinations that can provide robust visualization of the MRI markers. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended MRI pulse sequence protocol allows for consistent visualization of the markers to assist seed localization, potentially enabling MRI-only prostate postimplant dosimetry.
Authors: Steven J Frank; Ramesh C Tailor; Rajat J Kudchadker; Karen S Martirosyan; R Jason Stafford; Andrew M Elliott; David A Swanson; David Sing; Jonathan Choi; Firas Mourtada; Geoffrey S Ibbott Journal: Med Dosim Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 1.482
Authors: Christopher S Melhus; Justin K Mikell; Steven J Frank; Firas Mourtada; Mark J Rivard Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Gopal Varma; Rachel E Clough; Peter Acher; Julien Sénégas; Hannes Dahnke; Stephen F Keevil; Tobias Schaeffter Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Tze Yee Lim; R Jason Stafford; Rajat J Kudchadker; Madhuri Sankaranarayanapillai; Geoffrey Ibbott; Arvind Rao; Karen S Martirosyan; Steven J Frank Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Steven J Frank; Mary J Johansen; Karen S Martirosyan; Mihai Gagea; Carolyn S Van Pelt; Agatha Borne; Yudith Carmazzi; Timothy Madden Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Steven J Frank; R Jason Stafford; James A Bankson; Chun Li; David A Swanson; Rajat J Kudchadker; Karen S Martirosyan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Geoffrey V Martin; Thomas J Pugh; Usama Mahmood; Rajat J Kudchadker; Jihong Wang; Teresa L Bruno; Tharakeswara Bathala; Pierre Blanchard; Steven J Frank Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Jingfei Ma; Marinus A Moerland; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Tharakeswara K Bathala; Rajat J Kudchadker; Kristy K Brock; Steven J Frank Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Matteo Maspero; Peter R Seevinck; Nicole J W Willems; Gonda G Sikkes; Geja J de Kogel; Hans C J de Boer; Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp; Cornelis A T van den Berg Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Jeremiah W Sanders; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Chad A Levitt; Tharakeswara Bathala; Rajat J Kudchadker; Chad Tang; Teresa L Bruno; Christine Starks; Edwin Santiago; Michelle Wells; Carl P Weaver; Jingfei Ma; Steven J Frank Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 7.038